I think that says it all....Durangodave said:Lance is lucky he got OUT of racing before this years Tour.
Do you think he perhaps organised all this scandal to happen now rather than a year ago? After all, he is the devil.Durangodave said:Lance is lucky he got OUT of racing before this years Tour.
Oh fer cryin out loud. I was pulling for him in every tour he was in. He was lucky to do seven TdF's in which, despite various distractions, the cycling was the MAIN story.patch70 said:Do you think he perhaps organised all this scandal to happen now rather than a year ago? After all, he is the devil.
Lance doesn't have anything to do with Fuentes. He has other doctors.Durangodave said:Lance is lucky he got OUT of racing before this years Tour.
Merckx win by 30 mins? They now test for 50% hematocrit level.dm69 said:True or false: Eddy Merckx would win this tour by 30 minutes?
Seriously though how can anyone tell. Maybe the standard of the other guys has gotten better and lance might have finally gone downhill if he trained this year aswell ala Indurain 96. Just enjoy.
Fer cryin out loud, how do you not see that my comment was a joke???? Lighten up a little.Durangodave said:Oh fer cryin out loud. I was pulling for him in every tour he was in. He was lucky to do seven TdF's in which, despite various distractions, the cycling was the MAIN story.
I'm a fan of Lance (and many others), but I'm agnostic about the possibility of his doping. It's an awkward spot for a sports fan, but I think fans of ANY rider might find themselves in that position these days.
Oh fer Pete's sake, that's a good question actually. I guess I've seen so many bullets flying around this forum that I instinctively ducked.patch70 said:Fer cryin out loud, how do you not see that my comment was a joke???? Lighten up a little.
rubbish,steve26 said:Lance Armstrong would win this year's tour by 10+ minutes.
Probably kicking himself now...he would have won so easily.
Although that is all well and good and we'll give them the benefit of the doubt, there are a whole lot of other "dodgey doctors" out there. Just because these riders are not implicated with Dr Fuentes, they are not necessarily innocent. Lance's buddy Dr Ferrari did not just look after Lance. Dr Cecchini has a close association with Team CSC and other riders also. Riders that have been caught eg Millar did not work with Fuentes...wolfix said:Boonen is not involved. Zabel is not involved. The list goes on and on.
Rogers, Sinkewitz of T-mobile have been found out to have worked with Dr Ferrari recently. They make it clear that every rider has to sign a declaration that they do not/won't work with the doctor. Lance must be outraged! Who bets he doesn't challenge T-mobile?patch70 said:Although that is all well and good and we'll give them the benefit of the doubt, there are a whole lot of other "dodgey doctors" out there. Just because these riders are not implicated with Dr Fuentes, they are not necessarily innocent. Lance's buddy Dr Ferrari did not just look after Lance. Dr Cecchini has a close association with Team CSC and other riders also. Riders that have been caught eg Millar did not work with Fuentes...
Where will it all end?Ullefan said:Rogers, Sinkewitz of T-mobile have been found out to have worked with Dr Ferrari recently.
Lance stopped working with Ferrari a few years ago.Ullefan said:Rogers, Sinkewitz of T-mobile have been found out to have worked with Dr Ferrari recently. They make it clear that every rider has to sign a declaration that they do not/won't work with the doctor. Lance must be outraged! Who bets he doesn't challenge T-mobile?
wolfix said:Lance stopped working with Ferrari a few years ago.
No, he stopped working with him about 49 weeks ago.wolfix said:Lance stopped working with Ferrari a few years ago.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.