Doctor M:
First, if you are having trouble getting your heart rate up in a 10-15 minute maximum effort time trial, it may be true that you need a much more thorough warm up. Without knowing your situation, I would suggest cycling easy for 15 minutes, the do 3 or 4 x 1 minute at a strong effort (85% effort is probably ok), spin for 1 minute between each 1 minute rep and then spin for 5 extra minutes (hydrating during this easy spin with easily consumable solution or pure water with a tad of salt in it). Then, pick out a pre-measured route that has a loop, if possible. Go as hard as possible for the distance you choose (a distance that will cover 10-15 minutes). Note the heart rate in the last minute and in the minute afteward. You may need to use this heart rate later for training purposes (eg. doing MVO2 reps - 3-5 minute reps at this effort, heart rate, power output, velocity, or speed; whatever you choose).
Four days later, thoroughly warm up, then do 4 x 6 minutes at 10-8.5% slower than the speed you averaged in the 10-15 minute time trial. Do those reps on a loop course so that any wind, for or against you, won't effect your speed or heart rate as you try to achieve the target speed. *Note the heart rate in reps 2-4. The heart rate in the last part of the first rep will probably be about 4 beats below what it will be in subsequent reps. The LT (60 minute race pace) heart rate is likey to be valuable in other situations where speed may not be as easily controlled due to terrain (downhills) or wind (at your back) or road conditions (a road surface that is slower or faster).
Additionally, if you happen to use the same loop route for the 90% or 91.5% effort reps (60 minute race pace), and your heart rate and perceived exertion go down at the normal speed, then you are probably improving in fitness. Therefore, in the shorter term, feel confident that it is ok to increase the speed to reach the target heart rate and perceived exertion.
I would recommend re-testing every six weeks for a change in your 10-15 minute full-effort performance. Re-set speeds after that test for subsequent training.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, in reference to what I just read in ric's post, I see that he is using LT as a different term (meaning, I presume, the aerobic threshold lactate value which is lower than what traditionally used LT by physiologist). So, what we have is ric calling LT one thing and me another. LT by my definition is the world standard (an equivalent 4 mmol lactate value associated with the maximum lactate steady steady...the pace or intensity one can hold for a 60 minute race or very close there abouts). So, first, I must appologize to ric for not understanding that he was using a different version of LT than the one I have known and used. LT training, in the German Sports Schools and Soviet Sports Schools was 4 mmols and AT, aerobic threshold, was 2 mmols. They were the standards that I assumed ric was using. I was wrong. I am sorry.
Ric, I hope we can get past my error in understanding what you were defining. I agree that aerobic threshold (what you call LT) is in the 70 some percent range. By my definition, my aerobic threshold (based on the German model of Doctors Holman, Heck, Mader, and Madsen) puts a endurance trained cyclist at 77.5% of MAP on average.
Again, my appologies for not understanding your LT definiton and my appologies for causing you stress. Cheers, Tom