Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Tungsten/Titanium carbide lock coatings

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 862 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 July 2005
Last activity
10 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
862
Views / 30 days
6

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Since the harder a lock is the more difficult it is to cut, does anyone
    know if anyone has tried to coat lock shackles and/or bodies with a
    very thin layer of say tungsten or titanium carbide, or some other
    super-hard material? A thin coating makes it very difficult to
    penetrate with even the *best* cutting tools, and the interior is
    high-quality steel which isn't so brittle and expensive. Speaking of
    which, how much would such a superlock cost?

    Later,
    Nelson Chen
    __o Same road Boycott Wal-Mart, union-buster.
    _`\<,_ Same rights
    (_)/ (_) Same rules

  2. Quoted message said:


    Since the harder a lock is the more difficult it is to cut, does anyone
    know if anyone has tried to coat lock shackles and/or bodies with a
    very thin layer of say tungsten or titanium carbide, or some other
    super-hard material?

    A ceramic coating of that sort would likely spall and chip away from
    the area being cut.

    This general principle has already been employed in a simpler way, with
    carburizing, aka "case hardening" of steel. A process employing heat
    and a carbon-rich, oxygen-starved enclosure results in a cortex of very
    hard material over a core of tougher steel.

    Though I don't know of any specifically, I would expect that some
    existing U-locks use carburized shackles.

    Chalo Colina

  3. Quoted message said:

    Since the harder a lock is the more difficult it is to cut, does anyone
    know if anyone has tried to coat lock shackles and/or bodies with a
    very thin layer of say tungsten or titanium carbide, or some other
    super-hard material? A thin coating makes it very difficult to
    penetrate with even the *best* cutting tools, and the interior is
    high-quality steel which isn't so brittle and expensive. Speaking of
    which, how much would such a superlock cost?

    As of the last time I looked into this (for a different purpose),
    carbides in general can't be deposited, they have to be formed and
    then soldered in place. Machining a thin shell to fit the shape of a
    U-lock's shackle would be a time-intensive task. You're talking about
    an end product that's likely to be high into three figures, if not
    four, either in US dollars or Euros. For that expenditure, you would
    gain increased resistance to some common cutting tools. Since that's
    not the method employed in the vast majority of U-lock-defeating
    attacks, and since the carbide shell would add little or nothing to
    the shackle's ability to resist leverage attacks, the increased cost
    would produce little benefit.

    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.