blazingpedals said:It looks like a monstrosity to me. The 'captain' seat in rear looks like it was put there as an afterthought. The riding position is unreal. The whole bike looks incredibly clunky. Sorry, I guess you could say I don't like it.
blazingpedals said:You asked for opinions of that particular half-recumbent based on the picture, which is only a file picture, straight off TW-Bent's web site. Interestingly, not a pic of one you purportedly own (a "2010 new model" you have owned and ridden since 2008?) If you like it, great. Why do you need my approval?
"A" said:....opinions are like a$$holes, everybody's got one and all of them stink.
If you don't want to read opinions that don't fit your ideal, then don't post the freakin' question. You in no way qualified your question in terms of who was "allowed" to respond and whether their response had to be based on experience or could be just an opinion based on the photo. Think about that and how your snit now sits, relative to the constraints you placed (i.e., none.).What do you think of it?
alienator said:By your own reasoning, the same is true for your opinion. Just because the guy had an opinion that didn't mesh with yours re: a specific type of equipment isn't exactly a reason to act like a **** would.
Remember, you asked:If you don't want to read opinions that don't fit your ideal, then don't post the freakin' question. You in no way qualified your question in terms of who was "allowed" to respond and whether their response had to be based on experience or could be just an opinion based on the photo. Think about that and how your snit now sits, relative to the constraints you placed (i.e., none.).
"A" said:WTF have you got to contribute to the topic of this thread other than jabber about
my posts/comments?
GTFO if you don't have anything relative to contribute.
alienator said:Wow. You're a lot tougher than the other cheerleaders.
I see you can't respond about the points re: you acting as a jerk would to the other guy. As for GTFO, sorry. It's not your thread. It's public. Perhaps you ought to take your own advice if you're going to be so intolerant of opinions that differ from yours. Again, since you seem to have either memory or reading issues, the other guy expressed his opinion in a pretty polite way. You did the polar opposite in response to his opinion. Don't ask questions if the answers you get are going to twist your panties.
"A" said:You still have contributed nothing to the topic of this thread, at least the other one pretend that he has some opinions, even though he lacks any valid experience with semi-recumbent tandems.
Looks like being sorry is what you're good at.. stay sorry.
alienator said:Again, you failed to read your original question and successfully understand what it meant to the people reading it.
Levy all the insults you want, but don't think that you won't be seen for what you are and what you lack. Alas, all you've contributed to the thread is a bad attitude and ignorance. Of course, it's likely that bad boy persona of yours is the reason that all the other boys in the trailer park think you're the best.
Feel free to try an act like a tolerable, passably educated human being.
blazingpedals said:'A' - Apparently, nobody here is qualified to respond to your posts. Which makes me wonder why you posted in the first place. I pointed out the Hase and the Opus as examples of well-designed combination tandems. I did not say I had no experience; although it's true I haven't owned one. I've checked out the Opus in my club up close, and was impressed. Maybe not owning one still disqualifies me from commenting. If so, well, you're not going to find many people who actually own one. Certainly not here or they'd have spoken up already. How many of them has TW-Bents sold? One?
"A" said:If you really want to find out, contact TW-bent ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.