U.S. Transfers Sovereignty to Iraqi Govt.

Steve · Jun 28, 2004

> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader
> does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--B_3171231817_21348470 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-
ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_SOVEREIGNTY?SIT-
E=CADIU&SECTION=H OME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

U.S. Transfers Sovereignty to Iraqi Govt.

By TAREK EL-TABLAWY Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- The U.S.-led coalition transferred
sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government Monday, speeding
up the move by two days in an apparent bid to surprise
insurgents who may have tried to sabotage the step toward
self rule.

--B_3171231817_21348470 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-
ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>U.S. Transfers Sovereignty to Iraqi
Govt.</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <a hr=
ef=3D"http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_SOVEREIGN-
TY?SITE=3DCADIU&SECTI= ON=3DHOME&TEMPLATE=3DDEFAULT">http:/-
/hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_SOVERE= IGNTY?SITE=3D-
CADIU&SECTION=3DHOME&TEMPLATE=3DDEFAULT</a> 
 
U.S. Transfers Sovereignty
to Iraqi Govt.<FO= NT
SIZE=3D"4"> By TAREK= EL-
TABLAWY Associated Press Writer 
<= SPAN STYLE=3D'font-size:14.0px'>BAGHDAD,
Iraq (AP) -- The U.S.-led coalition t= ransferred
sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government Monday, speeding
up th= e move by two days in an apparent bid to surprise
insurgents who may have tr= ied to sabotage the step toward
self rule. </BODY> </HTML>

--B_3171231817_21348470--

Veloman · Jun 28, 2004

Completely a symbolic move. Iraq doesn't have a military
willing to fight nor a police force strong enough to enforce
rule. Internal security will be our
responsibility...probably for the next ten years or so.

When our "illustrious" president entered us in this conflict
he laid out 3 reasons for war:
1. Iraq had weapons of mass destruction - WRONG!
2. Iraq aided and harbored Al Qaeda - WRONG!
3. Iraq posed and immenent threat to the U.S. - WRONG!

Now if you notice in his recent speaches he doesn't even
mention any of these topics. What he now says is we entered
Iraq to rid the world of a ruthless dictator who was
butchering his own people. Ok, so lets say this is the case
(which we know it isn't) and now we are "protecting" the
world from "evil" leaders; why just attack Iraq? What about
North Korea, Iran, Syria, Sudan etc. ?

Mr. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz should suit up and
go fight there own war. Bunch of morons!

Michael · Jun 28, 2004

"veloman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Completely a symbolic move.

And under the cover of darkness because the country is
completely gripped with fear.

M.

Davide Tosi · Jun 28, 2004

Steve <[email protected]> wrote:

<snip>

What do you have to tell us about the results in yesterday's
National Championships that took place in many different
countries? Nothing? Then if you know nothing about cycling,
please move your hyperpoliticized ass to a more apt
newsgroup.

B. Lafferty · Jun 28, 2004

"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "veloman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Completely a symbolic move.
>
> And under the cover of darkness because the country is
> completely gripped with fear.
>
> M.

From the Bushies' standpoint, a prudent move. They must have
know all hell was set to break loose on the 30th.

Steve · Jun 28, 2004

On 6/28/04 9:48 AM, in article
[email protected], "B. Lafferty"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]
> kc.rr.com...
>>
>> "veloman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Completely a symbolic move.
>>
>> And under the cover of darkness because the country is
>> completely gripped with fear.
>>
>> M.
>
> From the Bushies' standpoint, a prudent move. They must
> have know all hell was set to break loose on the 30th.
>
>
Hey Bri-Bri..... It is the terrorists doing the fighting!
Not the iraqi civilians!

First you guys are all pissy because "The job was not
finished" last time (Along with Iraqi civilians tortured and
murdered!)

Now the job is being finished and Iraqi civilians are given
a chance for a life that Mexicans are putting their life in
danger to get here crossing the border through the desert
and you guys WHINE & ***** ???????

What the f*ck!!!!!!!!

B. Lafferty · Jun 28, 2004

"Steve" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:BD059D02.30702%[email protected]...
> >
> > From the Bushies' standpoint, a prudent move. They must
> > have know all
hell
> > was set to break loose on the 30th.
> >
> >
> Hey Bri-Bri..... It is the terrorists doing the fighting!
> Not the iraqi civilians!

Fox must be behind on the latest US military position on
who's fighting them. I suggest that you contact Halliburton
and arrange to take one of those truck driver jobs in Iraq
that they pay $8 to $10 thousand a month for doing. Get
yourself a satellite phone and call us when you're attacked
and or captured. Let us know if the attackers are Iraqi
civilians (that includes demobilized Iraqi soldiers) or if
they're non-Muslim foreigners. Oh, and when they behead you,
try not to squeel like a stuck pig. Remember---the Iraqis
are thrilled that you came to liberate them and help rebuild
their country.

>
> First you guys are all pissy because "The job was not
> finished" last time (Along with Iraqi civilians tortured
> and murdered!)

Many of us didn't think the first war should have been
fought to begin with. Remember, Saddam was Rummys man.

>
> Now the job is being finished and Iraqi civilians are
> given a chance for a life that Mexicans are putting their
> life in danger to get here crossing
the
> border through the desert and you guys WHINE & *****
> ???????

Interesting logic, or lack of it.
>
> What the f*ck!!!!!!!!

Come on now. Be a man like Cheney and have the balls to
say/write the

Howard Kveck · Jun 28, 2004

In article <[email protected]>,
"B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Steve" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:BD059D02.30702%[email protected]...
> > Now the job is being finished and Iraqi civilians are
> > given a chance for a life that Mexicans are putting
> > their life in danger to get here crossing
> the border through the desert and you guys WHINE &
> ***** ???????
>
> Interesting logic, or lack of it.

"Finished"? Ho ho. I guess that depends on how you
define "sovereignity". I guess that would be when
another nation has control of your police, military,
finances and media (among others), and more or less
chose who even got to be picked to be on the "governing
council". (It does seem like Iraq was a sovereign nation
up to about 19 March, 2003.)

We'll be there for ages - even Wolfowitz is starting to
see that. Funny how Rummy and company mocked the generals
(such as Gen Shalkashvili) who said that we'd need far
more troops to do the job effectively. Maybe they were
right? <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61943-
2004Jun22.html>

> > What the f*ck!!!!!!!!
>
> Come on now. Be a man like Cheney and have the balls to
> say/write the

"Probably".

--
tanx, Howard

"The fickleness of fame and fortune's
caprice Together changed the life of Mason
Reese" Alice Donut

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Search

U.S. Transfers Sovereignty to Iraqi Govt.

Steve

Guest

Veloman

Guest

Michael

Guest

Davide Tosi

Guest

B. Lafferty

Guest

Steve

Guest

B. Lafferty

Guest

Howard Kveck

Guest

Similar threads

We value your privacy