UK and Europe · Public discussion

UCI clear Armstrong, target lab and WADA

Started by Tony Raven · · Last activity · 5 posts · 284 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
9 September 2005
Last activity
10 September 2005
Original author
Tony Raven
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
284
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. UCI have issued a press release clearing Armstrong and asking some
    searching questions about the bodies involved in the testing and
    information release:

    http://www.uci.ch/modello.asp?1stlevelid=B&level1=2&level2=0&idnews=3731

    They also accuse the journalist of targetting Armstrong and obtaining
    access to UCI information under false pretences.

    "We have substantial concerns about the impact of this matter on the
    integrity of the overall drug testing regime of the Olympic movement,
    and in particular the questions it raises over the trustworthiness of
    some of the sports and political authorities active in the anti-doping
    fight."

    --
    Tony

    "I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't"
    Anon

  2. Tony Raven said:

    UCI have issued a press release clearing Armstrong and asking some
    searching questions about the bodies involved in the testing and
    information release:

    http://www.uci.ch/modello.asp?1stlevelid=B&level1=2&level2=0&idnews=3731

    They also accuse the journalist of targetting Armstrong and obtaining
    access to UCI information under false pretences.

    "We have substantial concerns about the impact of this matter on the
    integrity of the overall drug testing regime of the Olympic movement,
    and in particular the questions it raises over the trustworthiness of
    some of the sports and political authorities active in the anti-doping
    fight."

    so does this mean he is or isn't going for no 8?

  3. Tony Raven said:

    They also accuse the journalist of targetting Armstrong and obtaining
    access to UCI information under false pretences.

    Pas de merde sherlock, what next? Tony Blair accusing journalists of
    targetting him and using leaks. Like Doohhhh, that's part of a
    journalist's job, stop bleating about it UCI.

  4. Tony Raven wrote on Fri, 9 Sep 2005

    Quoted message said:

    UCI have issued a press release clearing Armstrong and asking some
    searching questions about the bodies involved in the testing and
    information release:

    http://www.uci.ch/modello.asp?1stlevelid=B&level1=2&level2=0&idnews=3731

    They also accuse the journalist of targetting Armstrong and obtaining
    access to UCI information under false pretences.

    "We have substantial concerns about the impact of this matter on the
    integrity of the overall drug testing regime of the Olympic movement,
    and in particular the questions it raises over the trustworthiness of
    some of the sports and political authorities active in the anti-doping
    fight."


    "Our initial investigation has identified a great many issues and we are
    in the process of gathering the information we need. The UCI is
    currently unable to express any judgement on these cases, as it does not
    have sufficient information."
    --
    Iain Archer To email, please use Reply-To address

  5. "Iain Archer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Tony Raven wrote on Fri, 9 Sep 2005

    Quoted message said:

    UCI have issued a press release clearing Armstrong and asking some
    searching questions about the bodies involved in the testing and
    information release:

    http://www.uci.ch/modello.asp?1stlevelid=B&level1=2&level2=0&idnews=3731

    They also accuse the journalist of targetting Armstrong and obtaining
    access to UCI information under false pretences.

    "We have substantial concerns about the impact of this matter on the
    integrity of the overall drug testing regime of the Olympic movement,
    and in particular the questions it raises over the trustworthiness of
    some of the sports and political authorities active in the anti-doping
    fight."


    "Our initial investigation has identified a great many issues and we are
    in the process of gathering the information we need. The UCI is currently
    unable to express any judgement on these cases, as it does not have
    sufficient information."

    This is standard presentation for uk.rec.cycling. No point in trying to
    fight it ;o)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.