Uh-oh, even the mainstream U.S. press...



But he didn't tell the complete story....... Those riders were guilty when on another team. He should have been a propaganda writer. He led his readers to a conclusion that was not the real story.

I think most people that are attacking the cyclists are disgruntled riders who have no skill themselves. They love sitting around their pathetic little cubicles at work trying to impress their co-workers with knowledge of the cycling world when their co-workers could care less. This writer probably is that type.
 
wolfix said:
But he didn't tell the complete story....... Those riders were guilty when on another team. He should have been a propaganda writer. He led his readers to a conclusion that was not the real story.

I think most people that are attacking the cyclists are disgruntled riders who have no skill themselves. They love sitting around their pathetic little cubicles at work trying to impress their co-workers with knowledge of the cycling world when their co-workers could care less. This writer probably is that type.

Geez, did you even read this story before you composed this petty little personal attack on the story's writer? Maybe you should check this line:

Suspicious? Sure. Indisputable proof? Hardly.

The guy is hardly trying to damn LA. And is it suspicious? Well, heck, it's hardly good news for Armstrong. And it's only a fraction of the story. What about Heras? And Frankie Andreau? And Allen Davis, implicated in Puerto and signed by Discovery? Or the associations with Ferrari? Or the text messages about doping between Vaughters and Andreau? Or the accusations of at least two former employees? Or the suspicious if not conclusive EPO and corticosteroid tests? Or the bag or needles dumped in 1999? Or the fact that LA trounced an entire peloton doped to the gills? Geez, is it suspicious? ARE YOU EVEN PAYING ATTENTION?
 
tcklyde said:
The guy is hardly trying to damn LA. And is it suspicious? Well, heck, it's hardly good news for Armstrong. And it's only a fraction of the story. What about Heras? And Frankie Andreau? And Allen Davis, implicated in Puerto and signed by Discovery? Or the associations with Ferrari? Or the text messages about doping between Vaughters and Andreau? Or the accusations of at least two former employees? Or the suspicious if not conclusive EPO and corticosteroid tests? Or the bag or needles dumped in 1999? Or the fact that LA trounced an entire peloton doped to the gills? Geez, is it suspicious? ARE YOU EVEN PAYING ATTENTION?
Armstrong jock sniffers never pay attention. If they did then they would have to admit the obvious.
 

Similar threads