Sorry if this is old ground... but I'm new to the forum, and can't be arsed reading through loads of what has been said... just been through a few reams...and this is in vogue, but hasn't been said.
From my angle, the people of the UK are a good deal closer to the culture and mentality of the people of mainland Europe than they are to the people in the USA. The US approach seems to be to live to work... Europeans work to live... and enjoy their leisure. I prefer the Euro approach. Euro business is morally more justified: more concerns about working conditions, morality etc. Europeans are more concerned about green issues. And European sportsmen are less prone to use drugs...
This is what brassed me off about the Iraq War. The Franco-German hesitance was totally justified: Iraq seemed to be motivated by the little boy wanting to avenge his dad getting his rear end kicked... as well as wanting the US to have a mega oil reserve to draw upon for their ecologically unsound economy once the barbaric Saudi regime goes into a state of disrepair. If we stuck by our Euro allies, then the Euro bond would have been stronger. As it is, the rather right wing leader of our leftish government would have maintained popularity and stopped the country being seen as the US poodle.
Finally, as the Chinese have bought up most of the US debt... and lets face it, the US economy is a total joke... then if they start to call in the debt... Yay! the first world will shake... and I'd much prefer our economy to be intertwined with Europe than the shaky economics of 'spending our way out of difficulty'. If I tried the 'spending my way out of difficulty' approach at home I think the banks would take the ****.
Rant out of the way. More of a Euro-centric approach from the UK preferred!!!
From my angle, the people of the UK are a good deal closer to the culture and mentality of the people of mainland Europe than they are to the people in the USA. The US approach seems to be to live to work... Europeans work to live... and enjoy their leisure. I prefer the Euro approach. Euro business is morally more justified: more concerns about working conditions, morality etc. Europeans are more concerned about green issues. And European sportsmen are less prone to use drugs...
This is what brassed me off about the Iraq War. The Franco-German hesitance was totally justified: Iraq seemed to be motivated by the little boy wanting to avenge his dad getting his rear end kicked... as well as wanting the US to have a mega oil reserve to draw upon for their ecologically unsound economy once the barbaric Saudi regime goes into a state of disrepair. If we stuck by our Euro allies, then the Euro bond would have been stronger. As it is, the rather right wing leader of our leftish government would have maintained popularity and stopped the country being seen as the US poodle.
Finally, as the Chinese have bought up most of the US debt... and lets face it, the US economy is a total joke... then if they start to call in the debt... Yay! the first world will shake... and I'd much prefer our economy to be intertwined with Europe than the shaky economics of 'spending our way out of difficulty'. If I tried the 'spending my way out of difficulty' approach at home I think the banks would take the ****.
Rant out of the way. More of a Euro-centric approach from the UK preferred!!!