Road Cycling · Public discussion

Update: New Bike for Newbie

Started by kramer · · Last activity · 5 posts · 467 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 March 2005
Last activity
22 March 2005
Original author
kramer
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
467
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have narrowed it down to the Trek 7300FX or 7500FX. Most likely, the
    7300FX is all I need, but I was hoping someone could spell out the component
    difference between the 2 bikes. Unfortunately, the local bike shop that
    carries Trek wasn't very helpful and before I get over to another shop I
    want to have my homework done. The main diff I can see are listed below
    with the 7300fx first and the 7500fx second. The price difference is $200
    so money really isn't an issue other than the fact that I don't like to
    needlessly spend it if it is just overkill. And in case you didn't catch my
    earlier post, this bike is for mostly street/bike path trips under 20 miles
    for exercise mainly and enjoyment also. Thanks.

    PART 7300fx 7500fx

    shifters Alivio Deore

    Front der. c102 Deore

    Rear der. Deore Shimano LX

    Crankset t303 Bont. Select
    48/38/28 48/36/26

    Cassette sram 850 sram 950
    11-32, 8 speed 11-34, 9 speed

    Pedals Alloy ATB Wellgo sigleside clipless

    wheels alloy fornt Bontrager select
    deore rear hub

    tires Bontrager invert Bontrager race Lite
    Hardcase
    Hardcase

    Fork Triple butted cro-moly Aluminum

    Brakes Promax forged v Shimano 420 v

    seat Bontrager sport Bontrager race

  2. kramer said:

    I have narrowed it down to the Trek 7300FX or 7500FX. Most likely, the
    7300FX is all I need, but I was hoping someone could spell out the component
    difference between the 2 bikes. Unfortunately, the local bike shop that
    carries Trek wasn't very helpful and before I get over to another shop I
    want to have my homework done. The main diff I can see are listed below
    with the 7300fx first and the 7500fx second. The price difference is $200
    so money really isn't an issue other than the fact that I don't like to
    needlessly spend it if it is just overkill. And in case you didn't catch my
    earlier post, this bike is for mostly street/bike path trips under 20 miles
    for exercise mainly and enjoyment also. Thanks.

    The 7500FX for 2005 has a couple upgraded components from last year's
    model. The 2004 model had an sram 850 11-32 8 speed, and a 48/38/28. This
    seems just fine to me. The 9 speed is nice, though. ;-)

    The 'Bontrager Select Race Lite' wheels are not needed on a 25lb bike.
    Regular 32 spoke wheels are just fine.

    My brother has the 7200fx which is supposedly one step down from the 7300fx
    and he likes it just fine.

    Take them both on a test ride and go through all the gears, stand up to
    pedal, try to ride up a hill, test the brakes for smoothness and quickness
    of braking.

    The biggest significant difference I see is the 'cro-moly' front fork vs
    the aluminum front fork.

    Shimano LX rear der could be considered significantly better than Deore
    deraileurs. That's what I'd focus on during the test ride. Is the shifting
    quiet and smooth on both? If even a little better on the 7500fx, I'd spend
    the money to get them. (they are upgradeable, too. Deore is not).

    If you expect having a nice bike would increase your mileage, then go ahead
    and pay the $200 and get the 7500fx.

    Good luck,

    jj

    Quoted message said:

    PART 7300fx 7500fx

    shifters Alivio Deore

    Front der. c102 Deore

    Rear der. Deore Shimano LX

    Crankset t303 Bont. Select
    48/38/28 48/36/26

    Cassette sram 850 sram 950
    11-32, 8 speed 11-34, 9 speed

    Pedals Alloy ATB Wellgo sigleside clipless

    wheels alloy fornt Bontrager select
    deore rear hub

    tires Bontrager invert Bontrager race Lite
    Hardcase
    Hardcase

    Fork Triple butted cro-moly Aluminum

    Brakes Promax forged v Shimano 420 v

    seat Bontrager sport Bontrager race

  3. Quoted message said:

    I have narrowed it down to the Trek 7300FX or 7500FX. Most likely, the
    7300FX is all I need, but I was hoping someone could spell out the
    component
    difference between the 2 bikes. Unfortunately, the local bike shop that
    carries Trek wasn't very helpful and before I get over to another shop I
    want to have my homework done. The main diff I can see are listed below
    with the 7300fx first and the 7500fx second. The price difference is $200
    so money really isn't an issue other than the fact that I don't like to
    needlessly spend it if it is just overkill. And in case you didn't catch
    my
    earlier post, this bike is for mostly street/bike path trips under 20
    miles
    for exercise mainly and enjoyment also. Thanks.

    Biggest differences are in the wheels (lighter weight and look way-cool) and
    fork (aluminum, quite a bit lighter than the chrome-moly). If you get into
    steeper terrain, the slightly-lower (both a smaller front and larger rear
    cog) gearing on the 7500FX could come in handy.

    Also, the wheels on the 7500FX might be a bit more versatile if you get into
    longer rides, since they'll accept narrower tires than the wheels on the
    7300FX.

    But both bikes are equivalent values; you get pretty much what you pay for
    in either case.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

  4. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:11:34 -0800, "kramer" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I have narrowed it down to the Trek 7300FX or 7500FX. Most likely, the
    7300FX is all I need, but I was hoping someone could spell out the component
    difference between the 2 bikes. Unfortunately, the local bike shop that
    carries Trek wasn't very helpful and before I get over to another shop I
    want to have my homework done. The main diff I can see are listed below
    with the 7300fx first and the 7500fx second. The price difference is $200
    so money really isn't an issue other than the fact that I don't like to
    needlessly spend it if it is just overkill. And in case you didn't catch my
    earlier post, this bike is for mostly street/bike path trips under 20 miles
    for exercise mainly and enjoyment also. Thanks.

    Hi, get the one that excites you the most. The one that screams ride
    me. If money is not an important consideration, get the 7500FX. If you
    get the other one, you will always wonder if you should have gotten
    the better model, so just get it;-)

    As I'm sure you have been told, make sure that the fit is right. Then
    go have some fun.

    Life is Good!
    Jeff

  5. Well, for what you want to use it for, I think either would work fine.

    That being said, I would go with the 7500 because of the aluminum fork
    and clipless pedals, along with the Deore shifters. That's assuming
    you like the handling and ride of both bikes equally.

    It might not be that big of a deal if you're only looking at going for
    shorter rides, but you never know what you might want to do later on,
    and you might be happy later on that you bought the one with the
    better/lighter components (and clipless pedals). Also the better
    components might bring more if you decide to sell the bike down the
    line for a road bike or something else.

    Either way, you should come out all right.

    -Bill H.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.