artemidorus said:Why don't you set yourself a rule? - you have to wear out or break something to be allowed to replace it.
Not in Sydney. Only took me three years to break both wheels in crashes. Now I've got those Cosmic Carbones I've been hankering for. Strangely enough, and disappointingly, they don't seem to make me any faster.alienator said:What fun is that? Using your logic, a guy would have to wait a good while to get new, spiffy wheels
I understand that the rider is the biggest issue, but why then would anyone get a $6000 bike over a $2000 bike? I have a $2000 bike, which I like very much, but it weighs 20 pounds. I think I'll need to spend around $4000 to get a 17-pound bike. If this less weight makes me a few minutes faster up a 30 minute climb, I think it's worth it. So I guess my point is that the bike does matter to some extent.artemidorus said:The rotating inertia hypothesis has been debunked as being vanishingly insignificant. 1 g on the rim is 99.9% equal to 1g on your waistline. Similarly, bearing quality has an almost immeasurably small effect on efficiency, assuming that they are not actually damaged.
If you go to deep profile wheels ($$$$), you may notice a 1% speed improvement at a given power output. Or you may not notice it.
Seriously, just ride it. The only upgrades that I've ever noticed riding my road bike were my DA shifters (in comparison with 105), and the only difference was the feel, not the utility.
3 pounds save some minutes on a 30 min climb? More like some seconds. At best, you're talking about a 2% weight change for the system, so your time will be 2%, or less, better. That's neglecting the fact that aerodynamic resistance won't necessarily change with your new bike, so you don't even get your full 2% time benefit.jojoma said:I understand that the rider is the biggest issue, but why then would anyone get a $6000 bike over a $2000 bike? I have a $2000 bike, which I like very much, but it weighs 20 pounds. I think I'll need to spend around $4000 to get a 17-pound bike. If this less weight makes me a few minutes faster up a 30 minute climb, I think it's worth it. So I guess my point is that the bike does matter to some extent.
artemidorus said:Not in Sydney. Only took me three years to break both wheels in crashes. Now I've got those Cosmic Carbones I've been hankering for. Strangely enough, and disappointingly, they don't seem to make me any faster.
That's about the same weight as my front wheel! Enjoy your double 1% advantage!alienator said:Do the LEW VT-1 wheels sitting behind me, right now, count as spiffy? I know at <800g for the set, they do be quasi-lightweight.
alienator said:But what about the prostitutes?
Do the LEW VT-1 wheels sitting behind me, right now, count as spiffy? I know at <800g for the set, they do be quasi-lightweight.
artemidorus said:That's about the same weight as my front wheel! Enjoy your double 1% advantage!
benkoostra said:How goes your testing of these wheels? Any breakage? Do women throw their panties at you? Do share...
Dentists. Must they have a hand in everything?alienator said:Well, just so you know, women throw their panties at me anyway. It's an accepted fact--as documented by 9 out of 10 dentists--that chicks dig me.
The testing will be commencing as soon as the Vittoria Pave's are in my hands and glued on and as soon as I have a video system. I just received the front wheel last Friday. The rear wheel is on the bike with a Vittoria EVO Corsa CX glued on. I must say, mounting was easy as the tire required no alignment after the initial mounting.
Yes, at least 111%!alienator said:Awesome! So you're saying that I can expect 1% + 1%......so an 11% improvement!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.