poulidor said:
Yes but it's on available for some US cycling fans... The rest of the world should know some riders as consumers of PEDs.
I hope that you are joking. Are you saying that Europeans are blissfully unaware that their is doping in sports (IAAF, Cycling, etc.).
What will Lemond accomplish:
1. Doping exists. Just look at the evidence in terms of increased performance.
2. Cycling is hard. The Grand Tours ask for superhuman efforts. Grand Tour winners need to take dope. I won GTs but didn't dope. No contradicton.
3. Races are faster in the current era (not really true if you look at some races) therefore current riders dope.
4. Faster racing coincided with the end of my career (by the time I was moving on in age anyway), therefore, my eclipse was caused by doping.
5. Only dopers could beat me. That's obvious.
6. I've never taken dope but can personally attest to its performance benefits. They beat me didn't they, therefore, they doped, since dope works.
7. I have no idea if Landis doped. I'm not a doctor or a scientist and I have never taken dope so I couldn't comment as to what effect it would have on my performance, but I know that doping works. It must, since I got beaten and only dopers could beat me.
8. Landis doped, Lance doped, Tyler doped, every US cyclist who followed me and enjoyed success doped.
9. #8 doesn't contradict #7.
10. I'm the last clean TdF champion (well the only one really since everyone after me doped and once I prove that I'll prove that everyone before me with more than 3 TdF victories (I'm looking at you EM, BH and JA) doped as well.
The End.