R
Robert Chung
Guest
A couple of days ago, cyclingnews.com ran a story about how USAC had recently released its new
selection criteria for Track Worlds. The contentious issue wasn't so much the criteria themselves,
but their release in March for the July championships. That issue was originally discussed in
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/?id=2003/mar03/mar24news2#trackies
Cyclingnews now has USAC's Steve Johnson's response at
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/?id=2003/mar03/mar26news2
Here's an interesting excerpt: "USAC in fact didn't change the selection criteria, we simply had not
yet published them for this year."
selection criteria for Track Worlds. The contentious issue wasn't so much the criteria themselves,
but their release in March for the July championships. That issue was originally discussed in
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/?id=2003/mar03/mar24news2#trackies
Cyclingnews now has USAC's Steve Johnson's response at
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/?id=2003/mar03/mar26news2
Here's an interesting excerpt: "USAC in fact didn't change the selection criteria, we simply had not
yet published them for this year."