I don't agree, I think this rant makes a good case for Lance and co to go downOriginally Posted by steve .
I reckon he's go an up hill battle ahead, either way it's not good for the sport.
yes. thank you.Originally Posted by lance_armstrong .
IMHO, this whole matter rests on the issue of whether or not to let what may be the most incredible lie in the history of cycling continue to exist. If the evidence is there, and the scope of Armstrong's unrivaled success is based on lies, there must be some kind of accountability, even if too many years have passed. If he is truly found to have cheated to win all of those TDFs, then he has set a new standard for the greedy pursuit of success, and it cannot be ignored or rationalized any longer. I love this sport, and more than anything, I just want the truth to come out.
The problem is how deep one digs oneself into a corner after the fact. Some are quick to fess up when they know the gig is up, others somehow manage to go deeper and deeper hoping continued denial will play in their favor, and I believe it is possible to go so deep one never emerges. Even for folks who are inclined to give the confessed a nod for a heartfelt contrition it's gonna be hard to feel anything for Lance if the truth emerges the way it's looking like it's gonna. And whether or not people choose to forgive these guys, and the good of the sport notwithstanding, for these guys themselves it's a moment where they conciously choose to try and redeem even a fraction of whatever character they once had, or throw their souls away for good. It's some heavy ****.Originally Posted by CAMPYBOB .
...then he has set a new standard for the greedy pursuit of success
Meh. Even Eddie doped.
I love this sport and could not possibly care less that Eddie doped.
But, since he was sanctioned back in 1970what?, let's just go back and take away all his wins. Screw Eddie. Dopage!!
And that Moser *******! Blood doping just to get the farking hour record? We need Congress to look into that!
Yeah...they cheated.
Evidently di Grigorio held up Eddie as his idol.
Pete Rose lost a bet and The Rocket won one. Life goes on.
You're gonna have tell to me who's Martha Stewart?Originally Posted by jhuskey .
Ask Martha Stewart. I beleive they asked her if she was a ***** and she said no. She was charged with lying in a federal hearing. That's the way I remember it.
No idea, I suspect she most likely brought and sold dubious products.Originally Posted by limerickman .
You're gonna have tell to me who's Martha Stewart?
That name doesn't ring any bells here in the Old World.
I'm not sure what the point of this is??Originally Posted by CAMPYBOB .
Yeah, she's a doper and aided doping, but gentlemen...I present Exibit 'A'!
Her hair is doped. Her lips are doped. Her melons are doped (they're real if you can touch them!!). Her nose is 'suspected' of being doped!
We freely admit, her performance HAS been enhanced!
Now...look the jury members straight in the eye and tell them doping is bad for the sport! Tell them you wouldn't do a little dope with her! Tell the jury you WOULD call your doctor if you had an erection lasting more than four hours!
Your honor, the defense rests.
I thought Marta Stewart was an alias for Mrs Rumsas or such like./img/vbsmilies/smilies/duck.gifOriginally Posted by steve .
No idea, I suspect she most likely brought and sold dubious products.
She is or was famous as a TV homemaker type, vey rich but lied to the feds about insider trading. That got her a conviction.Originally Posted by limerickman .
I thought Marta Stewart was an alias for Mrs Rumsas or such like./img/vbsmilies/smilies/duck.gif
I see . Thanks!Originally Posted by jhuskey .
She is or was famous as a TV homemaker type, vey rich but lied to the feds about insider trading. That got her a conviction.
Oh boy.Originally Posted by CAMPYBOB .
...edit...
Your honor, the defense rests.
I'll give you zeitgeist. These fellas were the ones I watched growing up. I still sometimes ride without a lid because that's the way we did it and nothing seemed outta place back then and old habits die hard. These days I can't go 2 laps without some wippersnapper saying "where's ya helmet?". I know it's not right but I still do it anyway. Does it matter for anyone else? It's my brains gonna be decorating the tarmac. Jefferson gets a free pass because that's the way they did it. But the times they are a changin'.Originally Posted by CAMPYBOB .
Sorry. I see it as anything BUT heavy. Like the Slovak said...Tommy Jefferson, one of my idols, owned slaves. And screwed them literally and figuratively. Zeitgeist baby. Same with Lancer Armstrong, the All-American Boy. And Lance...even lose a minute of speed-dialing moist blonde bimbettes over this? He NEVER had that kind of character to sacrifice to begin with.
Thanks. I gather that's the origin of the phrase do as I say not do as I do. I do make exceptions for racing, the rain, riding through the city to get to the glorious roads on the skirts, and if I know the usual coconuts are running the warp speed paceline in my local park.Originally Posted by CAMPYBOB .
April 5th I had the good fortune to catapult myself over a loose mutt that ran out from behind a pickup truck that was parked close to the road.
No warning.
The judge from Vulgaria awarded me a 9.5...if only I had stuck the landing! 40 years of cycling bare headed, in a leather hairnet (Cinelli and a thicker Kucharik (sp?) and later still Brancale , Giro, etc. hardshells.
In all of my many falls I never put a scuff mark on my skull or any of those helmets...until April 5th. The helmet split thru to the interior in two spots, but still did its job.
Please BE CAREFUL when riding "like we used to"...in our mis-spent youth!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.