Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

VDO wireless transmitter mount

Started by Bob · · Last activity · 5 posts · 551 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
1 September 2005
Last activity
2 September 2005
Original author
Bob
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
551
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Thinking of buying a new VDO C2DS wireless. Instruction manual says to mount transmitter on front fork with magnet on front wheel. I'd rather mount on rear so I can record speed while on the trainer. Does anyone have experience with this new VDO computer, with or without mounting the transmitter on the rear (but particularly with)?

    Thanks in advance.

    --------------= Posted using GrabIt =----------------
    ------= Binary Usenet downloading made easy =---------
    -= Get GrabIt for free from http://www.shemes.com/ =-

  2. Bob said:

    Thinking of buying a new VDO C2DS wireless. Instruction manual says
    to mount transmitter on front fork with magnet on front wheel. I'd
    rather mount on rear so I can record speed while on the trainer. Does
    anyone have experience with this new VDO computer, with or without
    mounting the transmitter on the rear (but particularly with)?

    Thanks in advance.

    --------------= Posted using GrabIt =----------------
    ------= Binary Usenet downloading made easy =---------
    -= Get GrabIt for free from http://www.shemes.com/ =-

    Most wireless transmitters are low power and have a very short range.
    Mounting on the rear wheel is further away than the max range of the
    transmitter, plus your body is blocking it too. During winter I mount a
    cheap wired computer on my bikes rear wheel so I can count my mileage.

  3. Dave Thompson said:

    Most wireless transmitters are low power and have a very short range.
    Mounting on the rear wheel is further away than the max range of the
    transmitter, plus your body is blocking it too.

    Not only that, but they are extremely susceptible to interference,
    which can be very annoying for anyone using them to record total
    mileage.

  4. Andrew Price said:
    Dave Thompson said:

    Most wireless transmitters are low power and have a very short range.
    Mounting on the rear wheel is further away than the max range of the
    transmitter, plus your body is blocking it too.

    Not only that, but they are extremely susceptible to interference,
    which can be very annoying for anyone using them to record total
    mileage.

    But you can't really blame them, if they were strong enough to register
    from the rear, they'd also be strong enough to register from the fork of
    your buddy next to you.

    Jasper

  5. On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:05:45 GMT, Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not only that, but they are extremely susceptible to interference,
    which can be very annoying for anyone using them to record total
    mileage.

    But you can't really blame them, if they were strong enough to register
    from the rear, they'd also be strong enough to register from the fork of
    your buddy next to you.

    I must have expressed myself badly - what I meant to say was that they
    are *already* too damn sensitive, as it is. The one I had used to
    pick up from all sorts of sources.

    I could practically never go into a shop with the thing in my pocket,
    as the anti-theft barriers at the cash desk would make it joyfully
    bound forward, anywhere from 100 metres or so to over 4 km!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.