Slavery is one of the stains on conservatism!lokstah said:Care to identify where and how I did so?
Republicans now represent Southern voters!
Slavery is one of the stains on conservatism!lokstah said:Care to identify where and how I did so?
No, I resent the concept of a double standard. You, & zap, it would seem, see no difference in the fact that different people are brought up w/ different priveledges or lack thereof. Instead of adressing the root causation & possibly remedying it, you attack the end result. What you are saying is that these people are predetermined to become criminals. Am I correct in that assumptionColorado Ryder said:You obviously resent the concept of personal responsibility.
That's a cheap summation of thread chatter from different sources, and not an accurate reference to anything I've ever posted.Colorado Ryder said:Slavery is one of the stains on conservatism!
Republicans now represent Southern voters!
No. These people have their own minds. They have the ability to do the right thing or the wrong thing. The choice is theirs to make. Being poor or abused as children are not valid excuses to commit crimes.davidmc said:No, I resent the concept of a double standard. You, & zap, it would seem, see no difference in the fact that different people are brought up w/ different priveledges or lack thereof. Instead of adressing the root causation & possibly remedying it, you attack the end result. What you are saying is that these people are predetermined to become criminals. Am I correct in that assumption
Their voting base is in the "old confederacy". IF racism exist's, which we know it does, where is it in preponderance The "old confederacy". I'm not saying every person down there is racist but, a great many inre to the North. As an aside, every Republican "get-together" photo I see is, for the most part, bereft of black faces. That says alot right there. It is the party of the "Have's" as opposed to the "Have-not's".Colorado Ryder said:I resent yours and Lokstahs insinuations that conservatives are racist.
So, you are saying that "rigging" the system to benefit the upper-class is O.K. in your book. Someone from the South Bronx is on a level playing feild, all other things being unequal errr...I mean equal, as someone from Park Avenue Surely you jest.Colorado Ryder said:No. These people have their own minds. They have the ability to do the right thing or the wrong thing. The choice is theirs to make. Being poor or abused as children are not valid excuses to commit crimes.
How is bigotry connected to conservatism?lokstah said:That's a cheap summation of thread chatter from different sources, and not an accurate reference to anything I've ever posted.
And for the record, I'm not insinuating--I'm insisting that the legacy of bigotry is well-connected to the history of conservativism in America. By the same token, I would never (and never have) indicated that, as you put it, "conservatives are racist" in a general sense. That's ludicrous and not something I believe.
Personally, I believe the best model has to rely on both approaches: it's absolutely necessary to hold individuals responsible for their own fate, and at the same time, society should be obligated to acknowledge, study and address the context behind social problems. All too often, arguments are made which dismiss one or the other, and that's silly.Colorado Ryder said:Being poor or abused as children are not valid excuses to commit crimes.
So what you are saying is that people don't have to responsible for their own actions. They can always blame someone or something else. Surely you jest.davidmc said:So, you are saying that "rigging" the system to benefit the upper-class is O.K. in your book. Someone from the South Bronx is on a level playing feild, all other things being unequal errr...I mean equal, as someone from Park Avenue Surely you jest.
I didn't equate it, I said it. Did you see my post on Strom Thurmond's 24 hr. fillibuster of civil right's & my mention of the lack of black faces in Republican get-together's. They are primarily white, christian, men for the most part. Christianity itself equates blacks to being punished (Hammites). Thats one, of many reasons, I'm not a Christian. The south is the red state monopoly right now.Colorado Ryder said:How is bigotry connected to conservatism?
And just a side note. When JitteringJR mentioned something about race you quickly called him on it. However, when David equates Republicans to trying to stop Civil rights, with a very clear insinuation of racism, you said nothing.
What I'm saying is that we have endemic, structural, barriers to the advancement of lower income individuals & you seem to be of the mind set that someone from Harlem is on par w/ someone from Park Place.Colorado Ryder said:So what you are saying is that people don't have to responsible for their own actions. They can always blame someone or something else. Surely you jest.
Kind of like we're doing right now?lokstah said:Personally, I believe the best model has to rely on both approaches: it's absolutely necessary to hold individuals responsible for their own fate, and at the same time, society should be obligated to acknowledge, study and address the context behind social problems. All too often, arguments are made which dismiss one or the other, and that's silly.
Still waiting to hear about Byrd and Wallace!davidmc said:I didn't equate it, I said it. Did you see my post on Strom Thurmond's 24 hr. fillibuster of civil right's & my mention of the lack of black faces in Republican get-together's. They are primarily white, christian, men for the most part. Christianity itself equates blacks to being punished (Hammites). Thats one, of many reasons, I'm not a Christian. The south is the red state monopoly right now.
No. I'm of the mind that people know what is right or wrong. Apparently you believe lower income individuals are too stupid to make this basic decision.davidmc said:What I'm saying is that we have endemic, structural, barriers to the advancement of lower income individuals & you seem to be of the mind set that someone from Harlem is on par w/ someone from Park Place.
But that solution would mean we'd have nothing to post about.lokstah said:That simple, huh?
You didn't address my issue of endemic, structural barriersColorado Ryder said:No. I'm of the mind that people know what is right or wrong. Apparently you believe lower income individuals are too stupid to make this basic decision.
And you're not addressing personal responsiblity.davidmc said:You didn't address my issue of endemic, structural barriers
What's wrong w/ addressing the cause of their dissatisfaction (see my graph outlining the obscene wage disparities present today) I'm wasting my time.Colorado Ryder said:But that solution would mean we'd have nothing to post about.
What's wrong with not giving someone an excuse for committing a crime?davidmc said:What's wrong w/ addressing the cause of their dissatisfaction (see my graph outlining the obscene wage disparities present today) I'm wasting my time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.