jim beam wrote:
> Tom Sherman wrote:
>> "jim beam" wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman wrote:
>>>> "jim beam" wrote:
- delete offending text -
>>>> "jim" is as wildly off the mark here as when he/she/it claimed the
>>>> newton was a unit of torque.
>>>
>>> ********. why do you have to resort to putting lies in my mouth? is
>>> it because you're a lightweight?
>>
>> You wrote it, "jim":
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/df61fa7fce144bc4?dmode=source>.
>
>
> which i clarified for you since you're too much of a freakin'
> lightweight to follow my "rationale".
>
> "and 300N applied as pure torque loading is unrealistic."
>
> want to ******** some more?
Yo "jim", you forgot to specify the moment arm, without which it is a
force, not a torque. Duh!
So apparently "jim" has a problem stating what he means in English, if
he/she/them/it actually knows that the newton (N) is not a unit of torque.
- delete more offending text -
>>>>>> What can a sock puppet say it has done?
>>>>>
>>>>> nothing - that's why i post evidence. what have you ever posted
>>>>> apart from pissing and moaning?
>>>>
>>>> Evidence that is meaningless to real world use - "jim" has yet to
>>>> post "evidence" that the wheel with missing spokes is a functional
>>>> bicycle wheel.
>>>
>>> er, my model demonstrates the fact that loose/missing spokes do not
>>> cause wheel collapse, i.e., the wheel does not depend on tension for
>>> load bearing, contrary to jobstian theory. /you/ otoh, keep trying
>>> to deviate from the purpose of such a demonstration with a fatigue
>>> reliability red herring. and with the obsessive inability to grasp
>>> detail of an a.s. sufferer.
>>
>> "jim's" test demonstrates that the wheel does not collapse only under
>> ONE condition that has NO RELEVANCE TO THE CONDITIONS THAT WOULD OCCUR
>> WHILE RIDING. Jobst Brandt was obviously referring to collapse that
>> would occur from actual use. Duh!
>
> what a fascinating self deception. tell me, how many real bridges have
> you tested to destruction then tom?
How is that relevant to the bicycle wheel?
>> "jim" also shows a great ignorance of A.S.
>
> you don't obviously.
Not a very snappy comeback, eh?
- delete even more offending text -
>>>>
>>>> What about people who think that the newton (N) is a unit of TORQUE?
>>>
>>> stop putting ******** in my mouth. i didn't say that - /you/ said i
>>> said it. lightweight.
>>
>> See
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/df61fa7fce144bc4?dmode=source>.
>
>
> see above. bullshitter.
See above, "jim", and learn to write English.
>>>>> i meant help for a.s. sufferers.
>>>>
>>>> What about help for anonymous Usenet cowards?
>>>>
>>>
>>> er, refusal to let a credentials pissing contest distract from the
>>> facts is not cowardice. resorting to childish lies of
>>> misrepresentation otoh, that looks pretty damned cowardly to me.
>>
>> No "jim" - tell us why you are afraid to use your real name here?
>> Common friends with other posters you flame that you would not want to
>> lose? Not wanting your personal agenda revealed?
>>
>> For better or worse, people like Jobst Brandt put their reputations on
>> the line when they post here. Sock puppets risk nothing. Duh!
>
>
> what? and foolishly get into a credentials pissing match where the great
> and mighty jobst brandt can play his stanford card? the stanford card
> that invariably bamboozles the ignorati and that has shamelessly been
> used to intimidate those who actually dare to point out that he doesn't
> know what he's talking about? i'm not that freakin' stupid. of course,
> if you were smart, you'd have figured that out, but instead you want to
> revel in your ability to swallow red herrings. what a lightweight!
What are you afraid of "jim" - that you are actually not a former
materials scientist?
> as for "reputations", tell you what, you try putting yours on the
> line with some factual contributions for a change. all you've done in
> all these years is **** and moan. i have a /great/ idea for you to make
> a contribution - how about you do some wheel reliability testing?
> you're not too cowardly to do that are you?
Ooooooooh, a challenge from an anonymous coward sock puppet!
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"the grinning buddy bear carries a fork." - g.d.
