S
Shaun Rimmer
Guest
G.T. <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> (Pete Cresswell) wrote:
> > RE/
> >
> >>but the 800 doesn't have the optical zoom at all. That's the one feature I would really like
> >>to have
> >
> >
> > Why optical zoom? To see the subject better? Other than that, everything I've heard so far
> > suggests that you get
better
> > quality by just re-sizing/zooming later on in the graphics editor.
>
> Depends on what you're zooming in on. If it's wildlife or a rider at some distance then zooming in
> digitally looks like ****.
Shaun aRe
news:[email protected]...
> (Pete Cresswell) wrote:
> > RE/
> >
> >>but the 800 doesn't have the optical zoom at all. That's the one feature I would really like
> >>to have
> >
> >
> > Why optical zoom? To see the subject better? Other than that, everything I've heard so far
> > suggests that you get
better
> > quality by just re-sizing/zooming later on in the graphics editor.
>
> Depends on what you're zooming in on. If it's wildlife or a rider at some distance then zooming in
> digitally looks like ****.
Shaun aRe