H
H. Morgan
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:30:17 -0500, The Magnificent *******
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:59:51 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs the
>lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>whenever it's told -
>
>
>> The Magnificent ******* wrote:
>> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:04:45 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs
>> > the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>> > whenever it's told -
>> >
>> >
>> >> Doofer wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:03:41 -0400, "sanjian"
>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Considering what separates atheletes at that level, if you spam,
>> >>>> you will take more. The US is forced to leave behind many very
>> >>>> serious contenders, because of the size of our team. If we
>> >>>> decided that the US was going to send a team from every state, you
>> >>>> would hear alot of complaining from Europe.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why? Would that be because the UK doesn't send a team from every
>> >>> *country*?
>> >>
>> >> The EU does. The EU is nothing but the early stages of what the US
>> >> began as.
>> >
>> >
>> > It will never happen.
>> >
>> > How are they going to have a Boston Tea Party?
>>
>> They have plenty of lovely loches.
>>
>> I'm speaking more of the loss of soverignty than to any hope that the EU
>> actually be relevent.
>
>It's only a matter of time before the US decides to conquer Europe. It
>will definitely happen in the next 25 years.
>
>>
Now it's obvious that you're an idiot.
>>
>>
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:59:51 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs the
>lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>whenever it's told -
>
>
>> The Magnificent ******* wrote:
>> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:04:45 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs
>> > the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>> > whenever it's told -
>> >
>> >
>> >> Doofer wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:03:41 -0400, "sanjian"
>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Considering what separates atheletes at that level, if you spam,
>> >>>> you will take more. The US is forced to leave behind many very
>> >>>> serious contenders, because of the size of our team. If we
>> >>>> decided that the US was going to send a team from every state, you
>> >>>> would hear alot of complaining from Europe.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why? Would that be because the UK doesn't send a team from every
>> >>> *country*?
>> >>
>> >> The EU does. The EU is nothing but the early stages of what the US
>> >> began as.
>> >
>> >
>> > It will never happen.
>> >
>> > How are they going to have a Boston Tea Party?
>>
>> They have plenty of lovely loches.
>>
>> I'm speaking more of the loss of soverignty than to any hope that the EU
>> actually be relevent.
>
>It's only a matter of time before the US decides to conquer Europe. It
>will definitely happen in the next 25 years.
>
>>
Now it's obvious that you're an idiot.
>>
>>
S
sanjian
Guest
The Magnificent ******* wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:59:51 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs
> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
> whenever it's told -
>> I'm speaking more of the loss of soverignty than to any hope that
>> the EU actually be relevent.
>
> It's only a matter of time before the US decides to conquer Europe.
> It will definitely happen in the next 25 years.
Do we want it? Or would it be out of irritation?
Actually, there are many nations in Europe that I have hope for. Among
them, Italy and most of the old Warsaw Pact nations. Most of Western Europe
will continue to try to disavow its relevence.
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:59:51 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs
> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
> whenever it's told -
>> I'm speaking more of the loss of soverignty than to any hope that
>> the EU actually be relevent.
>
> It's only a matter of time before the US decides to conquer Europe.
> It will definitely happen in the next 25 years.
Do we want it? Or would it be out of irritation?
Actually, there are many nations in Europe that I have hope for. Among
them, Italy and most of the old Warsaw Pact nations. Most of Western Europe
will continue to try to disavow its relevence.
H
H. Morgan
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:19:10 -0700, gwhite
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>"H. Morgan" wrote:
>>
>
>> No, I find your country funny currently (and sick).
>
>
>How about that: war is funny.
The way in which your leader marches your young men off to be killed
to make himself and his friends richer is pathetically funny in a
sick sort of way.
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>"H. Morgan" wrote:
>>
>
>> No, I find your country funny currently (and sick).
>
>
>How about that: war is funny.
The way in which your leader marches your young men off to be killed
to make himself and his friends richer is pathetically funny in a
sick sort of way.
of course, that makes sense, everything that happened before you can remember doesnt matter. Ever heard of the saying "if you dont know your past you cant know your future"?. Do you wander around in circles at home wondering what to do next?Fx199 said:
Whats pathetic is that you didnt read my location dipsh*t!Fx199 said:
T
Tim McNamara
Guest
The Magnificent ******* <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:36:53 -0500, in alt.tv.sopranos, Tim McNamara
>
>> The Magnificent ******* <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > Sorry, but you're the one who doesn't know what he's talking
>> > about. Armstrong's six wins in the Tour are unprecedented.
>>
>> Yes, no one else has won 6 Tours. I've managed to agree with you
>> on that several times, but being the dolt you are you haven't
>> noticed. Where we disagree, I suspect, is that winning 6 Tours
>> does not make Armstrong the "BEST EVER" as you claim it does. If
>> you actually understood bike racing you'd understand.
>
> I do understand bike racing. And I also understand that Armstrong
> is THE BEST. You're the one that doesn't understand, Tim. You
> babble on and on about classics, blindly ignoring that the Tour Le
> France always has been and always will be the one true measurement
> of a champion cyclist.
Again you show your ignorance. Or is it stupidity? After all,
ignorance can be fixed, stupid is forever. I hope you're just
ignorant.
> If you even knew *one* professional cyclist, you'd know that by now.
Thanks, I do know a pro cyclist who raced in Europe professionally for
several years and raced as a pro mountain biker for a few more years.
Really nice, guy, humble and knowledgeable. Not to mention one of the
youngest-ever finishers of Paris-Roubaix. I know a few more people
who raced as amateurs in Europe, too. And I raced as a mediocre
amateur for 10 years myself. I've been following the sport since
1973, which is much easier now in the ero of Internet than it was back
in the 70s when race reports finally got to the US about 3 months
late.
>> > If you don't realize that he's claimed the title of "BEST EVER"
>> > then you are a complete moran.
>>
>> No, I'm a McNamara not a Moran. The Morans are a fine family, I've
>> known a few, but we're not related.
>
> Bob Saget has nothing on you.
Yeah, but he's funnier than you.
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:36:53 -0500, in alt.tv.sopranos, Tim McNamara
>
>> The Magnificent ******* <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > Sorry, but you're the one who doesn't know what he's talking
>> > about. Armstrong's six wins in the Tour are unprecedented.
>>
>> Yes, no one else has won 6 Tours. I've managed to agree with you
>> on that several times, but being the dolt you are you haven't
>> noticed. Where we disagree, I suspect, is that winning 6 Tours
>> does not make Armstrong the "BEST EVER" as you claim it does. If
>> you actually understood bike racing you'd understand.
>
> I do understand bike racing. And I also understand that Armstrong
> is THE BEST. You're the one that doesn't understand, Tim. You
> babble on and on about classics, blindly ignoring that the Tour Le
> France always has been and always will be the one true measurement
> of a champion cyclist.
Again you show your ignorance. Or is it stupidity? After all,
ignorance can be fixed, stupid is forever. I hope you're just
ignorant.
> If you even knew *one* professional cyclist, you'd know that by now.
Thanks, I do know a pro cyclist who raced in Europe professionally for
several years and raced as a pro mountain biker for a few more years.
Really nice, guy, humble and knowledgeable. Not to mention one of the
youngest-ever finishers of Paris-Roubaix. I know a few more people
who raced as amateurs in Europe, too. And I raced as a mediocre
amateur for 10 years myself. I've been following the sport since
1973, which is much easier now in the ero of Internet than it was back
in the 70s when race reports finally got to the US about 3 months
late.
>> > If you don't realize that he's claimed the title of "BEST EVER"
>> > then you are a complete moran.
>>
>> No, I'm a McNamara not a Moran. The Morans are a fine family, I've
>> known a few, but we're not related.
>
> Bob Saget has nothing on you.
Yeah, but he's funnier than you.
T
Tim McNamara
Guest
"sanjian" <[email protected]> writes:
> Tim McNamara wrote:
>
>> The Magnificent ******* <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> If you don't realize that he's claimed the title of "BEST EVER"
>>> then you are a complete moran.
>>
>> No, I'm a McNamara not a Moran. The Morans are a fine family, I've
>> known a few, but we're not related.
>
> But you wouldn't want your daughter to marry one?
I'd have no complaint about that, actually. If I had a daughter.
> Tim McNamara wrote:
>
>> The Magnificent ******* <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> If you don't realize that he's claimed the title of "BEST EVER"
>>> then you are a complete moran.
>>
>> No, I'm a McNamara not a Moran. The Morans are a fine family, I've
>> known a few, but we're not related.
>
> But you wouldn't want your daughter to marry one?
I'd have no complaint about that, actually. If I had a daughter.
T
Tim McNamara
Guest
Let me guess, Magnificant ******* = Paul Rubens. At least MB seems
to like to copy PeeWee Herman's rhetorical style and seems to think
it's funny. Rather sad, actually.
to like to copy PeeWee Herman's rhetorical style and seems to think
it's funny. Rather sad, actually.
T
The Magnificent Bastard
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:41:45 -0500, in alt.tv.sopranos, Tim McNamara
rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
this whenever it's told -
> Let me guess, Magnificant ******* = Paul Rubens. At least MB seems
> to like to copy PeeWee Herman's rhetorical style and seems to think
> it's funny. Rather sad, actually.
>
+###########V ####### I######t###### ####### #######
### ### ### .### = ####I, :V### X###+ t#####,
### ### #### I##R ### ##+###
### ##W #### ###, ### ### ##V
### ######R ###### ### ###
### ######## #### ### ##Y
### ###B B### ##X ##########
### ### ### ##X ############
### ### ;##X ##+ ## .##
###.### ### ,=###,V ###=X ##,##W;## t###.+ ::####
I###########X #######, ##### ########## #######X ########
. .. . ..
.tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii++;, .:;++iiiiiiiiiii;
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, ;tV#############WRI; :;;;;;;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, .X###########################t ,:;;;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;:: X###############W####WWW#WW#######M :;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;:, :W#######WW######W#WW#BWW#W#WW#WW#######t :;;;,
.=;;;;;;;: +W########W#W####WW#WW##############W#MW#W### :;;,
.=;;;;:, +#########################WMW######WMW##W#W###### :;,
.=;;:. =############WM######WB###WW####WWW#WW##W#WWW####### ;,
.=;;:,R#######################################WW###WW#WW#W###Y ;,
.=;;: I###############################I#####WW#W#BW#WWW##W###B ,,
.=;;;. ######################XI;+:;I V#####W#WWW###W#W#WWW### ,
.=;;;, +YB#######V#RI+ ..,,,:;= X#########M#WW#WWWWWW#B .
.=;;:,=;, :#B: ,;;;;;=++++++++++; I###############W#WW###
.=;::=ti++;.. ;=+++++I=++++=+++iiiiiii:+############WW#W#WW###
.=;,=t++++++=+I++ii++I+ii++I++iiiiiiti+, ####WW####WWW#WWWW####
.=:,+I+++=++=++++iiiii+iiiiiiiiii+++=+;::#W#####W#WW###W###WW##
.=,;ii++++++iii++++iii+iii+=iiii++++==:=R##########W####WW##M##
.;,ii++++++=I++ii++iiiiiii+iiiiiitiii=I######W##W##W#WM#B##W###
.;=Yiii+++++ii+I+iiii+iiiiiititiitiiIX###MW##BW#W###WWW#X#W###M .
.;+ii+iiii+iii+ttiittiiiiiittiitittY##########################X .
.,:;=++I+tiiii+iiiiiiiiitiiiiItttIItW##################; V#= ,
..RB;,+iiiiiii=+=:::.,.,;=ittYItiiItiW##############M +M###, ,,
.,W##X;+tii+=;,;;;+VVBXi.:;tItitItti+:t############X Y#B. .I#.,;,
.. +Xti++++Y#############X;=iiIIItt++:=B##W####B I= .++iI::;:
.,,+ ;=;+I=RXi, .:B###R+tttttItYtti######: ;+;V###Yi+I+;:;,
.,I###I =I=I=;+I;iRYt;. tBWXIiIIItItt=#Y##W :+t+##: ;BV=I;,:;:
.,Bt ###:+iYB##R##WMBI;:=I;=itIItItiti+;+.: =+iii B#W+,+I++:,;;,
.,;#V=X##,;+VBYXM#V #####BIIIItIIIttttiitiIti+ti;; I==+ti+,:;;,
.: +I+tYW.+II=;;ItXXY++W=,tYI+iitIttittItIYYiIiiti+#V+=iI=Y=,;;;,
,;,tVXYIi;+tt+ii+M#RYIVXXWXiiiii+ttYtIItIIitittittI+=;t+;VB.:;;;,
.;,I=:;;=+iIIYIi=;=IXVXI=::+++++iIIIIYIYIItii+ittt=;=;=++; ,;;;;,
.=.it++I==iYtYItIi+=:;:;;=+I+iIYYIIYIItIttiiitItit ;+:.,:;;;;;,
.=,+Iit+++IYiitittIIti=++I+++tYIIIIYYYItttttiIt=iM####..:;;;;;;;,
.=:iVtI=+;XVIYVVVYIIi++++itttttIYVYYIIIittiitIit+I#W#I ,;;;;;;;;,
.=,,+#X:+=IYVIYtt+R##V;=iittIYYYYYVXYIiittYYItitIRXBWY .:;;;;;;;,
.=:..#++t=++, ..+#XB##B+=iIYYVVIItiIYXVVVVYItVXBXVYR#.: ,:;;;;;,
.=;: +ttXBRIVM####I=tiB###MYYIIVBMBtYVXVtYIItXBMVItIX# #, .:;;;;,
.=;;:.. ,tW#####V=tItItX######WBVVBBVIIVYRXBBWWRtttYXW ##I ,:;;,
.=;;:;, WMMBRVXVYVVBW######M#RV#RVtX####RBYIYYYV#: XWMMi .:;,
.=, ,;: #MV=I#W########BXB##MWMRWRRB###BXBVIVYIXBX ,#VXW#I.,;,
.:,;IRBM###W###WWiM#W#W##+=iVitYXBWWRR#WXVRRBXVYRMW= iVBVIVBRt,;,
.;Y##M#MXXBVRtWWXVRW###XiIVYti+IXRBXX#RItVXVRVXBBV WtXYVYWX;.;,
:tVtYIRYtIR#Xt#####BtIXXYIitIYXWMXYMBIYRMXRW#WI . WMVtVtXRX:.;,
:I#MBVYYMWMB#.;+tYYYVVi++itYYVB#XtBMRB#####M+ ,, WRXYRRYiBV:,;,
:+***+iiRYVB#= ;;=:::;=+I=IYXW#VYMW######Y. :;, IWXYiIRt+B+:,;,
.:=ItVY#YRBWW## ,:=++=I+tIiBW#BYV######t ,=; ;WVXIYIVMYX+,:;,
.:;YBXVXiV#IRW##X:;;=tVRRB###XM####+ ,I :,.MBBYVY#VYMY;.:;,
.:+#I+MtXIIVtV#M#################B =######### : M#XiYBYVVXMY;,:;,
.;;V+ItYiIYYIVRB############WWBWB#####WW##### +#RBVBIRXIVBi,,;;,
.::IViYVVIXV#tXMW#W##WWW#WW#W###########WW### #BIBXVWRXBWV=,:;;,
.:;IBYY;#I#VRX:YI##WWMMM##################W## XVIVYRBXX#Xi=:,:;;,
.;:+MMVBVX+YYWRVi#B#MW####W :Y#W#####R.MYVXIIWMMtttY:,:;;,
.=,,+BRXYRIRVYRW+#;#####:; ,,:,, , t##R;tRiYVYRtVXVRRt,:;;;,
.=:,,iRV#WBXMRY#R#+ .. ,.;:::::::;,:,. RRt#MR#XVXRMWI=,:;;;,
,+=;::=iitIVtVXBX#= ,.:;;===========;===+:t#tVWB#BBRBXRI;;:;===+:
,=:,,. . .,,:;===;:,,,:;==;:,,,,.::;,...,.. ..,,,:;:
############ ######## Y#######= ####### ############
R############M Y####### ####### ####### ############
## ### ### ## ##M### ##
t## .## M## ### ,## W## X## ##t
t## t### :##, ####B B## ### ### ##t
t########## ##t ##### ### ### ##+ ##t
t###########, ##X ##.## ### ### ;. ### ##t
t## ###, ###M## ##W### ###########B ##t
I## ### #####, X####R ;############ ##I
.## t##R I#### ####; ### ##R ##
############### #### #### ####### I####### ############
:#MBBBBBBBMX; #B# #M# M#BBB## #MBBM#; I###########
[Copyright 2002, Aaron M. Henne]
--
Magnificent ******* Productions 2004 ©
http://www.magnificentbastardproductions.com
rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
this whenever it's told -
> Let me guess, Magnificant ******* = Paul Rubens. At least MB seems
> to like to copy PeeWee Herman's rhetorical style and seems to think
> it's funny. Rather sad, actually.
>
+###########V ####### I######t###### ####### #######
### ### ### .### = ####I, :V### X###+ t#####,
### ### #### I##R ### ##+###
### ##W #### ###, ### ### ##V
### ######R ###### ### ###
### ######## #### ### ##Y
### ###B B### ##X ##########
### ### ### ##X ############
### ### ;##X ##+ ## .##
###.### ### ,=###,V ###=X ##,##W;## t###.+ ::####
I###########X #######, ##### ########## #######X ########
. .. . ..
.tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii++;, .:;++iiiiiiiiiii;
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, ;tV#############WRI; :;;;;;;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, .X###########################t ,:;;;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;:: X###############W####WWW#WW#######M :;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;:, :W#######WW######W#WW#BWW#W#WW#WW#######t :;;;,
.=;;;;;;;: +W########W#W####WW#WW##############W#MW#W### :;;,
.=;;;;:, +#########################WMW######WMW##W#W###### :;,
.=;;:. =############WM######WB###WW####WWW#WW##W#WWW####### ;,
.=;;:,R#######################################WW###WW#WW#W###Y ;,
.=;;: I###############################I#####WW#W#BW#WWW##W###B ,,
.=;;;. ######################XI;+:;I V#####W#WWW###W#W#WWW### ,
.=;;;, +YB#######V#RI+ ..,,,:;= X#########M#WW#WWWWWW#B .
.=;;:,=;, :#B: ,;;;;;=++++++++++; I###############W#WW###
.=;::=ti++;.. ;=+++++I=++++=+++iiiiiii:+############WW#W#WW###
.=;,=t++++++=+I++ii++I+ii++I++iiiiiiti+, ####WW####WWW#WWWW####
.=:,+I+++=++=++++iiiii+iiiiiiiiii+++=+;::#W#####W#WW###W###WW##
.=,;ii++++++iii++++iii+iii+=iiii++++==:=R##########W####WW##M##
.;,ii++++++=I++ii++iiiiiii+iiiiiitiii=I######W##W##W#WM#B##W###
.;=Yiii+++++ii+I+iiii+iiiiiititiitiiIX###MW##BW#W###WWW#X#W###M .
.;+ii+iiii+iii+ttiittiiiiiittiitittY##########################X .
.,:;=++I+tiiii+iiiiiiiiitiiiiItttIItW##################; V#= ,
..RB;,+iiiiiii=+=:::.,.,;=ittYItiiItiW##############M +M###, ,,
.,W##X;+tii+=;,;;;+VVBXi.:;tItitItti+:t############X Y#B. .I#.,;,
.. +Xti++++Y#############X;=iiIIItt++:=B##W####B I= .++iI::;:
.,,+ ;=;+I=RXi, .:B###R+tttttItYtti######: ;+;V###Yi+I+;:;,
.,I###I =I=I=;+I;iRYt;. tBWXIiIIItItt=#Y##W :+t+##: ;BV=I;,:;:
.,Bt ###:+iYB##R##WMBI;:=I;=itIItItiti+;+.: =+iii B#W+,+I++:,;;,
.,;#V=X##,;+VBYXM#V #####BIIIItIIIttttiitiIti+ti;; I==+ti+,:;;,
.: +I+tYW.+II=;;ItXXY++W=,tYI+iitIttittItIYYiIiiti+#V+=iI=Y=,;;;,
,;,tVXYIi;+tt+ii+M#RYIVXXWXiiiii+ttYtIItIIitittittI+=;t+;VB.:;;;,
.;,I=:;;=+iIIYIi=;=IXVXI=::+++++iIIIIYIYIItii+ittt=;=;=++; ,;;;;,
.=.it++I==iYtYItIi+=:;:;;=+I+iIYYIIYIItIttiiitItit ;+:.,:;;;;;,
.=,+Iit+++IYiitittIIti=++I+++tYIIIIYYYItttttiIt=iM####..:;;;;;;;,
.=:iVtI=+;XVIYVVVYIIi++++itttttIYVYYIIIittiitIit+I#W#I ,;;;;;;;;,
.=,,+#X:+=IYVIYtt+R##V;=iittIYYYYYVXYIiittYYItitIRXBWY .:;;;;;;;,
.=:..#++t=++, ..+#XB##B+=iIYYVVIItiIYXVVVVYItVXBXVYR#.: ,:;;;;;,
.=;: +ttXBRIVM####I=tiB###MYYIIVBMBtYVXVtYIItXBMVItIX# #, .:;;;;,
.=;;:.. ,tW#####V=tItItX######WBVVBBVIIVYRXBBWWRtttYXW ##I ,:;;,
.=;;:;, WMMBRVXVYVVBW######M#RV#RVtX####RBYIYYYV#: XWMMi .:;,
.=, ,;: #MV=I#W########BXB##MWMRWRRB###BXBVIVYIXBX ,#VXW#I.,;,
.:,;IRBM###W###WWiM#W#W##+=iVitYXBWWRR#WXVRRBXVYRMW= iVBVIVBRt,;,
.;Y##M#MXXBVRtWWXVRW###XiIVYti+IXRBXX#RItVXVRVXBBV WtXYVYWX;.;,
:tVtYIRYtIR#Xt#####BtIXXYIitIYXWMXYMBIYRMXRW#WI . WMVtVtXRX:.;,
:I#MBVYYMWMB#.;+tYYYVVi++itYYVB#XtBMRB#####M+ ,, WRXYRRYiBV:,;,
:+***+iiRYVB#= ;;=:::;=+I=IYXW#VYMW######Y. :;, IWXYiIRt+B+:,;,
.:=ItVY#YRBWW## ,:=++=I+tIiBW#BYV######t ,=; ;WVXIYIVMYX+,:;,
.:;YBXVXiV#IRW##X:;;=tVRRB###XM####+ ,I :,.MBBYVY#VYMY;.:;,
.:+#I+MtXIIVtV#M#################B =######### : M#XiYBYVVXMY;,:;,
.;;V+ItYiIYYIVRB############WWBWB#####WW##### +#RBVBIRXIVBi,,;;,
.::IViYVVIXV#tXMW#W##WWW#WW#W###########WW### #BIBXVWRXBWV=,:;;,
.:;IBYY;#I#VRX:YI##WWMMM##################W## XVIVYRBXX#Xi=:,:;;,
.;:+MMVBVX+YYWRVi#B#MW####W :Y#W#####R.MYVXIIWMMtttY:,:;;,
.=,,+BRXYRIRVYRW+#;#####:; ,,:,, , t##R;tRiYVYRtVXVRRt,:;;;,
.=:,,iRV#WBXMRY#R#+ .. ,.;:::::::;,:,. RRt#MR#XVXRMWI=,:;;;,
,+=;::=iitIVtVXBX#= ,.:;;===========;===+:t#tVWB#BBRBXRI;;:;===+:
,=:,,. . .,,:;===;:,,,:;==;:,,,,.::;,...,.. ..,,,:;:
############ ######## Y#######= ####### ############
R############M Y####### ####### ####### ############
## ### ### ## ##M### ##
t## .## M## ### ,## W## X## ##t
t## t### :##, ####B B## ### ### ##t
t########## ##t ##### ### ### ##+ ##t
t###########, ##X ##.## ### ### ;. ### ##t
t## ###, ###M## ##W### ###########B ##t
I## ### #####, X####R ;############ ##I
.## t##R I#### ####; ### ##R ##
############### #### #### ####### I####### ############
:#MBBBBBBBMX; #B# #M# M#BBB## #MBBM#; I###########
[Copyright 2002, Aaron M. Henne]
--
Magnificent ******* Productions 2004 ©
http://www.magnificentbastardproductions.com
G
Granny Smith
Guest
C L Imber wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>> rubs
>> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>> whenever it's told -
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
>>>> does this whenever it's told -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
>>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
>>>>
>>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
>>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
>>>>
>>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and it
>>>> had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd change
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
>>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
>>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
>>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
>>>>
>>>> *Now* do you get it?
>>>
>>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to ignorance?
>>> A simple answer will suffice.
>>
>> It was deliberate.
>
> I think you're not being truthful.
Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>> rubs
>> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>> whenever it's told -
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
>>>> does this whenever it's told -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
>>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
>>>>
>>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
>>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
>>>>
>>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and it
>>>> had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd change
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
>>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
>>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
>>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
>>>>
>>>> *Now* do you get it?
>>>
>>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to ignorance?
>>> A simple answer will suffice.
>>
>> It was deliberate.
>
> I think you're not being truthful.
Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
W
Woody Pecker
Guest
"The Magnificent *******" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:41:45 -0500, in alt.tv.sopranos, Tim McNamara
> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
> this whenever it's told -
>
>
> > Let me guess, Magnificant ******* = Paul Rubens. At least MB seems
> > to like to copy PeeWee Herman's rhetorical style and seems to think
> > it's funny. Rather sad, actually.
> >
>
>
> +###########V ####### I######t###### ####### #######
> ### ### ### .### = ####I, :V### X###+ t#####,
> ### ### #### I##R ### ##+###
> ### ##W #### ###, ### ### ##V
> ### ######R ###### ### ###
> ### ######## #### ### ##Y
> ### ###B B### ##X ##########
> ### ### ### ##X ############
> ### ### ;##X ##+ ## .##
> ###.### ### ,=###,V ###=X ##,##W;## t###.+ ::####
> I###########X #######, ##### ########## #######X ########
> . .. . ..
> .tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii++;, .:;++iiiiiiiiiii;
> .=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, ;tV#############WRI; :;;;;;;;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, .X###########################t ,:;;;;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;;;;;;:: X###############W####WWW#WW#######M :;;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;;;:, :W#######WW######W#WW#BWW#W#WW#WW#######t :;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;: +W########W#W####WW#WW##############W#MW#W### :;;,
> .=;;;;:, +#########################WMW######WMW##W#W###### :;,
> .=;;:. =############WM######WB###WW####WWW#WW##W#WWW####### ;,
> .=;;:,R#######################################WW###WW#WW#W###Y ;,
> .=;;: I###############################I#####WW#W#BW#WWW##W###B ,,
> .=;;;. ######################XI;+:;I V#####W#WWW###W#W#WWW### ,
> .=;;;, +YB#######V#RI+ ..,,,:;= X#########M#WW#WWWWWW#B .
> .=;;:,=;, :#B: ,;;;;;=++++++++++; I###############W#WW###
> .=;::=ti++;.. ;=+++++I=++++=+++iiiiiii:+############WW#W#WW###
> .=;,=t++++++=+I++ii++I+ii++I++iiiiiiti+, ####WW####WWW#WWWW####
> .=:,+I+++=++=++++iiiii+iiiiiiiiii+++=+;::#W#####W#WW###W###WW##
> .=,;ii++++++iii++++iii+iii+=iiii++++==:=R##########W####WW##M##
> .;,ii++++++=I++ii++iiiiiii+iiiiiitiii=I######W##W##W#WM#B##W###
> .;=Yiii+++++ii+I+iiii+iiiiiititiitiiIX###MW##BW#W###WWW#X#W###M .
> .;+ii+iiii+iii+ttiittiiiiiittiitittY##########################X .
> .,:;=++I+tiiii+iiiiiiiiitiiiiItttIItW##################; V#= ,
> ..RB;,+iiiiiii=+=:::.,.,;=ittYItiiItiW##############M +M###, ,,
> .,W##X;+tii+=;,;;;+VVBXi.:;tItitItti+:t############X Y#B. .I#.,;,
> .. +Xti++++Y#############X;=iiIIItt++:=B##W####B I= .++iI::;:
> .,,+ ;=;+I=RXi, .:B###R+tttttItYtti######: ;+;V###Yi+I+;:;,
> .,I###I =I=I=;+I;iRYt;. tBWXIiIIItItt=#Y##W :+t+##: ;BV=I;,:;:
> .,Bt ###:+iYB##R##WMBI;:=I;=itIItItiti+;+.: =+iii B#W+,+I++:,;;,
> .,;#V=X##,;+VBYXM#V #####BIIIItIIIttttiitiIti+ti;; I==+ti+,:;;,
> .: +I+tYW.+II=;;ItXXY++W=,tYI+iitIttittItIYYiIiiti+#V+=iI=Y=,;;;,
> ,;,tVXYIi;+tt+ii+M#RYIVXXWXiiiii+ttYtIItIIitittittI+=;t+;VB.:;;;,
> .;,I=:;;=+iIIYIi=;=IXVXI=::+++++iIIIIYIYIItii+ittt=;=;=++; ,;;;;,
> .=.it++I==iYtYItIi+=:;:;;=+I+iIYYIIYIItIttiiitItit ;+:.,:;;;;;,
> .=,+Iit+++IYiitittIIti=++I+++tYIIIIYYYItttttiIt=iM####..:;;;;;;;,
> .=:iVtI=+;XVIYVVVYIIi++++itttttIYVYYIIIittiitIit+I#W#I ,;;;;;;;;,
> .=,,+#X:+=IYVIYtt+R##V;=iittIYYYYYVXYIiittYYItitIRXBWY .:;;;;;;;,
> .=:..#++t=++, ..+#XB##B+=iIYYVVIItiIYXVVVVYItVXBXVYR#.: ,:;;;;;,
> .=;: +ttXBRIVM####I=tiB###MYYIIVBMBtYVXVtYIItXBMVItIX# #, .:;;;;,
> .=;;:.. ,tW#####V=tItItX######WBVVBBVIIVYRXBBWWRtttYXW ##I ,:;;,
> .=;;:;, WMMBRVXVYVVBW######M#RV#RVtX####RBYIYYYV#: XWMMi .:;,
> .=, ,;: #MV=I#W########BXB##MWMRWRRB###BXBVIVYIXBX ,#VXW#I.,;,
> .:,;IRBM###W###WWiM#W#W##+=iVitYXBWWRR#WXVRRBXVYRMW= iVBVIVBRt,;,
> .;Y##M#MXXBVRtWWXVRW###XiIVYti+IXRBXX#RItVXVRVXBBV WtXYVYWX;.;,
> :tVtYIRYtIR#Xt#####BtIXXYIitIYXWMXYMBIYRMXRW#WI . WMVtVtXRX:.;,
> :I#MBVYYMWMB#.;+tYYYVVi++itYYVB#XtBMRB#####M+ ,, WRXYRRYiBV:,;,
> :+***+iiRYVB#= ;;=:::;=+I=IYXW#VYMW######Y. :;, IWXYiIRt+B+:,;,
> .:=ItVY#YRBWW## ,:=++=I+tIiBW#BYV######t ,=; ;WVXIYIVMYX+,:;,
> .:;YBXVXiV#IRW##X:;;=tVRRB###XM####+ ,I :,.MBBYVY#VYMY;.:;,
> .:+#I+MtXIIVtV#M#################B =######### : M#XiYBYVVXMY;,:;,
> .;;V+ItYiIYYIVRB############WWBWB#####WW##### +#RBVBIRXIVBi,,;;,
> .::IViYVVIXV#tXMW#W##WWW#WW#W###########WW### #BIBXVWRXBWV=,:;;,
> .:;IBYY;#I#VRX:YI##WWMMM##################W## XVIVYRBXX#Xi=:,:;;,
> .;:+MMVBVX+YYWRVi#B#MW####W :Y#W#####R.MYVXIIWMMtttY:,:;;,
> .=,,+BRXYRIRVYRW+#;#####:; ,,:,, , t##R;tRiYVYRtVXVRRt,:;;;,
> .=:,,iRV#WBXMRY#R#+ .. ,.;:::::::;,:,. RRt#MR#XVXRMWI=,:;;;,
> ,+=;::=iitIVtVXBX#= ,.:;;===========;===+:t#tVWB#BBRBXRI;;:;===+:
> ,=:,,. . .,,:;===;:,,,:;==;:,,,,.::;,...,.. ..,,,:;:
>
> ############ ######## Y#######= ####### ############
> R############M Y####### ####### ####### ############
> ## ### ### ## ##M### ##
> t## .## M## ### ,## W## X## ##t
> t## t### :##, ####B B## ### ### ##t
> t########## ##t ##### ### ### ##+ ##t
> t###########, ##X ##.## ### ### ;. ### ##t
> t## ###, ###M## ##W### ###########B ##t
> I## ### #####, X####R ;############ ##I
> .## t##R I#### ####; ### ##R ##
> ############### #### #### ####### I####### ############
> :#MBBBBBBBMX; #B# #M# M#BBB## #MBBM#; I###########
>
> [Copyright 2002, Aaron M. Henne]
>
> --
> Magnificent ******* Productions 2004 ©
>
> http://www.magnificentbastardproductions.com
....losing it.
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:41:45 -0500, in alt.tv.sopranos, Tim McNamara
> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
> this whenever it's told -
>
>
> > Let me guess, Magnificant ******* = Paul Rubens. At least MB seems
> > to like to copy PeeWee Herman's rhetorical style and seems to think
> > it's funny. Rather sad, actually.
> >
>
>
> +###########V ####### I######t###### ####### #######
> ### ### ### .### = ####I, :V### X###+ t#####,
> ### ### #### I##R ### ##+###
> ### ##W #### ###, ### ### ##V
> ### ######R ###### ### ###
> ### ######## #### ### ##Y
> ### ###B B### ##X ##########
> ### ### ### ##X ############
> ### ### ;##X ##+ ## .##
> ###.### ### ,=###,V ###=X ##,##W;## t###.+ ::####
> I###########X #######, ##### ########## #######X ########
> . .. . ..
> .tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii++;, .:;++iiiiiiiiiii;
> .=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, ;tV#############WRI; :;;;;;;;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, .X###########################t ,:;;;;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;;;;;;:: X###############W####WWW#WW#######M :;;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;;;:, :W#######WW######W#WW#BWW#W#WW#WW#######t :;;;,
> .=;;;;;;;: +W########W#W####WW#WW##############W#MW#W### :;;,
> .=;;;;:, +#########################WMW######WMW##W#W###### :;,
> .=;;:. =############WM######WB###WW####WWW#WW##W#WWW####### ;,
> .=;;:,R#######################################WW###WW#WW#W###Y ;,
> .=;;: I###############################I#####WW#W#BW#WWW##W###B ,,
> .=;;;. ######################XI;+:;I V#####W#WWW###W#W#WWW### ,
> .=;;;, +YB#######V#RI+ ..,,,:;= X#########M#WW#WWWWWW#B .
> .=;;:,=;, :#B: ,;;;;;=++++++++++; I###############W#WW###
> .=;::=ti++;.. ;=+++++I=++++=+++iiiiiii:+############WW#W#WW###
> .=;,=t++++++=+I++ii++I+ii++I++iiiiiiti+, ####WW####WWW#WWWW####
> .=:,+I+++=++=++++iiiii+iiiiiiiiii+++=+;::#W#####W#WW###W###WW##
> .=,;ii++++++iii++++iii+iii+=iiii++++==:=R##########W####WW##M##
> .;,ii++++++=I++ii++iiiiiii+iiiiiitiii=I######W##W##W#WM#B##W###
> .;=Yiii+++++ii+I+iiii+iiiiiititiitiiIX###MW##BW#W###WWW#X#W###M .
> .;+ii+iiii+iii+ttiittiiiiiittiitittY##########################X .
> .,:;=++I+tiiii+iiiiiiiiitiiiiItttIItW##################; V#= ,
> ..RB;,+iiiiiii=+=:::.,.,;=ittYItiiItiW##############M +M###, ,,
> .,W##X;+tii+=;,;;;+VVBXi.:;tItitItti+:t############X Y#B. .I#.,;,
> .. +Xti++++Y#############X;=iiIIItt++:=B##W####B I= .++iI::;:
> .,,+ ;=;+I=RXi, .:B###R+tttttItYtti######: ;+;V###Yi+I+;:;,
> .,I###I =I=I=;+I;iRYt;. tBWXIiIIItItt=#Y##W :+t+##: ;BV=I;,:;:
> .,Bt ###:+iYB##R##WMBI;:=I;=itIItItiti+;+.: =+iii B#W+,+I++:,;;,
> .,;#V=X##,;+VBYXM#V #####BIIIItIIIttttiitiIti+ti;; I==+ti+,:;;,
> .: +I+tYW.+II=;;ItXXY++W=,tYI+iitIttittItIYYiIiiti+#V+=iI=Y=,;;;,
> ,;,tVXYIi;+tt+ii+M#RYIVXXWXiiiii+ttYtIItIIitittittI+=;t+;VB.:;;;,
> .;,I=:;;=+iIIYIi=;=IXVXI=::+++++iIIIIYIYIItii+ittt=;=;=++; ,;;;;,
> .=.it++I==iYtYItIi+=:;:;;=+I+iIYYIIYIItIttiiitItit ;+:.,:;;;;;,
> .=,+Iit+++IYiitittIIti=++I+++tYIIIIYYYItttttiIt=iM####..:;;;;;;;,
> .=:iVtI=+;XVIYVVVYIIi++++itttttIYVYYIIIittiitIit+I#W#I ,;;;;;;;;,
> .=,,+#X:+=IYVIYtt+R##V;=iittIYYYYYVXYIiittYYItitIRXBWY .:;;;;;;;,
> .=:..#++t=++, ..+#XB##B+=iIYYVVIItiIYXVVVVYItVXBXVYR#.: ,:;;;;;,
> .=;: +ttXBRIVM####I=tiB###MYYIIVBMBtYVXVtYIItXBMVItIX# #, .:;;;;,
> .=;;:.. ,tW#####V=tItItX######WBVVBBVIIVYRXBBWWRtttYXW ##I ,:;;,
> .=;;:;, WMMBRVXVYVVBW######M#RV#RVtX####RBYIYYYV#: XWMMi .:;,
> .=, ,;: #MV=I#W########BXB##MWMRWRRB###BXBVIVYIXBX ,#VXW#I.,;,
> .:,;IRBM###W###WWiM#W#W##+=iVitYXBWWRR#WXVRRBXVYRMW= iVBVIVBRt,;,
> .;Y##M#MXXBVRtWWXVRW###XiIVYti+IXRBXX#RItVXVRVXBBV WtXYVYWX;.;,
> :tVtYIRYtIR#Xt#####BtIXXYIitIYXWMXYMBIYRMXRW#WI . WMVtVtXRX:.;,
> :I#MBVYYMWMB#.;+tYYYVVi++itYYVB#XtBMRB#####M+ ,, WRXYRRYiBV:,;,
> :+***+iiRYVB#= ;;=:::;=+I=IYXW#VYMW######Y. :;, IWXYiIRt+B+:,;,
> .:=ItVY#YRBWW## ,:=++=I+tIiBW#BYV######t ,=; ;WVXIYIVMYX+,:;,
> .:;YBXVXiV#IRW##X:;;=tVRRB###XM####+ ,I :,.MBBYVY#VYMY;.:;,
> .:+#I+MtXIIVtV#M#################B =######### : M#XiYBYVVXMY;,:;,
> .;;V+ItYiIYYIVRB############WWBWB#####WW##### +#RBVBIRXIVBi,,;;,
> .::IViYVVIXV#tXMW#W##WWW#WW#W###########WW### #BIBXVWRXBWV=,:;;,
> .:;IBYY;#I#VRX:YI##WWMMM##################W## XVIVYRBXX#Xi=:,:;;,
> .;:+MMVBVX+YYWRVi#B#MW####W :Y#W#####R.MYVXIIWMMtttY:,:;;,
> .=,,+BRXYRIRVYRW+#;#####:; ,,:,, , t##R;tRiYVYRtVXVRRt,:;;;,
> .=:,,iRV#WBXMRY#R#+ .. ,.;:::::::;,:,. RRt#MR#XVXRMWI=,:;;;,
> ,+=;::=iitIVtVXBX#= ,.:;;===========;===+:t#tVWB#BBRBXRI;;:;===+:
> ,=:,,. . .,,:;===;:,,,:;==;:,,,,.::;,...,.. ..,,,:;:
>
> ############ ######## Y#######= ####### ############
> R############M Y####### ####### ####### ############
> ## ### ### ## ##M### ##
> t## .## M## ### ,## W## X## ##t
> t## t### :##, ####B B## ### ### ##t
> t########## ##t ##### ### ### ##+ ##t
> t###########, ##X ##.## ### ### ;. ### ##t
> t## ###, ###M## ##W### ###########B ##t
> I## ### #####, X####R ;############ ##I
> .## t##R I#### ####; ### ##R ##
> ############### #### #### ####### I####### ############
> :#MBBBBBBBMX; #B# #M# M#BBB## #MBBM#; I###########
>
> [Copyright 2002, Aaron M. Henne]
>
> --
> Magnificent ******* Productions 2004 ©
>
> http://www.magnificentbastardproductions.com
....losing it.
T
The Magnificent Bastard
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:38 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, Granny Smith
rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
this whenever it's told -
> C L Imber wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
> >> rubs
> >> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
> >> whenever it's told -
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
> >>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
> >>>> does this whenever it's told -
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
> >>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
> >>>>
> >>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
> >>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
> >>>>
> >>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and it
> >>>> had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd change
> >>>> it?
> >>>>
> >>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
> >>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
> >>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
> >>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
> >>>>
> >>>> *Now* do you get it?
> >>>
> >>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to ignorance?
> >>> A simple answer will suffice.
> >>
> >> It was deliberate.
> >
> > I think you're not being truthful.
>
> Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
Granny, it's over his head. *Way* over.
>
>
>
--
Magnificent ******* Productions 2004 ©
http://www.magnificentbastardproductions.com
rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
this whenever it's told -
> C L Imber wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
> >> rubs
> >> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
> >> whenever it's told -
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
> >>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
> >>>> does this whenever it's told -
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
> >>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
> >>>>
> >>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
> >>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
> >>>>
> >>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and it
> >>>> had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd change
> >>>> it?
> >>>>
> >>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
> >>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
> >>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
> >>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
> >>>>
> >>>> *Now* do you get it?
> >>>
> >>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to ignorance?
> >>> A simple answer will suffice.
> >>
> >> It was deliberate.
> >
> > I think you're not being truthful.
>
> Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
Granny, it's over his head. *Way* over.
>
>
>
--
Magnificent ******* Productions 2004 ©
http://www.magnificentbastardproductions.com
G
Granny Smith
Guest
ObThe Magnificent ******* wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:38 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, Granny Smith
> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
> this whenever it's told -
>
>
>> C L Imber wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>> rubs
>>>> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
>>>> this whenever it's told -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
>>>>>> does this whenever it's told -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
>>>>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
>>>>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and
>>>>>> it had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd
>>>>>> change it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
>>>>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
>>>>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
>>>>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Now* do you get it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to
>>>>> ignorance? A simple answer will suffice.
>>>>
>>>> It was deliberate.
>>>
>>> I think you're not being truthful.
>>
>> Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
>
> Granny, it's over his head. *Way* over.
Obviously.
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:38 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, Granny Smith
> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
> this whenever it's told -
>
>
>> C L Imber wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>> rubs
>>>> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does
>>>> this whenever it's told -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
>>>>>> does this whenever it's told -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
>>>>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
>>>>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and
>>>>>> it had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd
>>>>>> change it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
>>>>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
>>>>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
>>>>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Now* do you get it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to
>>>>> ignorance? A simple answer will suffice.
>>>>
>>>> It was deliberate.
>>>
>>> I think you're not being truthful.
>>
>> Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
>
> Granny, it's over his head. *Way* over.
Obviously.
C
C L Imber
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:38 -0400, "Granny Smith"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>C L Imber wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>> rubs
>>> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>>> whenever it's told -
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
>>>>> does this whenever it's told -
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
>>>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
>>>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
>>>>>
>>>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and it
>>>>> had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd change
>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
>>>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
>>>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
>>>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Now* do you get it?
>>>>
>>>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to ignorance?
>>>> A simple answer will suffice.
>>>
>>> It was deliberate.
>>
>> I think you're not being truthful.
>
>Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
I don't believe you either.
<[email protected]> wrote:
>C L Imber wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:28 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>> rubs
>>> the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>>> whenever it's told -
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:55:09 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:26:22 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, C L Imber
>>>>> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It
>>>>> does this whenever it's told -
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:02:05 -0500, The Magnificent *******
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I put it in there intentionally so that every couple of
>>>>>>> weeks or so, some sucker will point out my mistake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guess you didn't think of that, did you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell me truly. Did you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or are you just an ignorant magnificent *******?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really want to know, check google. You'll see that the
>>>>> mistake has been pointed out to me several times.
>>>>>
>>>>> So....if there was an obvious mistake in my attribute line, and it
>>>>> had previously been pointed out to me, don't you think I'd change
>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe I put it there on purpose just to see how many people
>>>>> would be petty enough to point out a grammatical error........and
>>>>> maybe I leave it there so that I can laugh everytime some moran
>>>>> thinks he is the first person to point out the error.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Now* do you get it?
>>>>
>>>> Was the original mistake deliberate, accidental or due to ignorance?
>>>> A simple answer will suffice.
>>>
>>> It was deliberate.
>>
>> I think you're not being truthful.
>
>Smart Ass, it's an inside joke between MB and me.
I don't believe you either.
D
Doofer
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:31:38 -0500, The Magnificent *******
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:55:20 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, Doofer rubs the
>lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>whenever it's told -
>
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:03:03 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Doofer wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:01:15 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> But France sends athlets, as does Italy, Germany, Spain, Portugal...
>> >>> How many athletes are sent from the EU? Compared to the US?
>> >>
>> >> The UK has, so far, selected a team of 271 to compete in Athens.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.olympics.org.uk/teamgb/teamgb.asp
>> >
>> >So far. That's their current total.
>>
>> That's what I said, yes.
>>
>> At this late stage it would seem unlikely that the UK or the US would
>> add many more to their team totals.
>>
>> >> The US has, so far, selected a team of 531 to compete in Athens
>> >>
>> >> http://www.usoc.org/33.htm
>> >>
>> >> It would be reasonable to suppose that the French, German, Italian and
>> >> Dutch teams will be about the same size as that of the UK.
>> >>
>> >> This implies that HIGUF nations send approximately 2.5 times the
>> >> number of athletes to the Olympics as the US. They win approximately
>> >> twice the number of medals as the US.
>> >
>> >Which makes the US about 25% better than HIGUF. Or it could mean absolutely
>> >nothing. Either way...
>>
>> I consider it highly unlikely that the US would've doubled the size of
>> their medal haul if they sent 2.5 times the number of competitors to
>> the Sydney Olympics. Perhaps another ten medals at most.
>>
>> My conclusion is that Europe have a greater proportion of top class
>> athletes than the US.
>>
>> There may be good reasons.
>>
>> European nations have historically performed well in different
>> disciplines.
>>
>
>> The Brits are good at equestrian events
>
>Maybe because most of their women have disgusting horse faces.
You sound bitter.
>> and rowing, the French and
>> Dutch are good at sailing - East German (now German) female shot
>> putters are a legend in their own hormone bloated biceps. This means
>> that in many events European nations aren't really competing against
>> each other.
>>
>> The US lacks such a diversity in sporting terms, although it is
>> impressive that their ladies football team won gold.
>>
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:55:20 +0100, in alt.tv.sopranos, Doofer rubs the
>lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>whenever it's told -
>
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:03:03 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Doofer wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:01:15 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> But France sends athlets, as does Italy, Germany, Spain, Portugal...
>> >>> How many athletes are sent from the EU? Compared to the US?
>> >>
>> >> The UK has, so far, selected a team of 271 to compete in Athens.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.olympics.org.uk/teamgb/teamgb.asp
>> >
>> >So far. That's their current total.
>>
>> That's what I said, yes.
>>
>> At this late stage it would seem unlikely that the UK or the US would
>> add many more to their team totals.
>>
>> >> The US has, so far, selected a team of 531 to compete in Athens
>> >>
>> >> http://www.usoc.org/33.htm
>> >>
>> >> It would be reasonable to suppose that the French, German, Italian and
>> >> Dutch teams will be about the same size as that of the UK.
>> >>
>> >> This implies that HIGUF nations send approximately 2.5 times the
>> >> number of athletes to the Olympics as the US. They win approximately
>> >> twice the number of medals as the US.
>> >
>> >Which makes the US about 25% better than HIGUF. Or it could mean absolutely
>> >nothing. Either way...
>>
>> I consider it highly unlikely that the US would've doubled the size of
>> their medal haul if they sent 2.5 times the number of competitors to
>> the Sydney Olympics. Perhaps another ten medals at most.
>>
>> My conclusion is that Europe have a greater proportion of top class
>> athletes than the US.
>>
>> There may be good reasons.
>>
>> European nations have historically performed well in different
>> disciplines.
>>
>
>> The Brits are good at equestrian events
>
>Maybe because most of their women have disgusting horse faces.
You sound bitter.
>> and rowing, the French and
>> Dutch are good at sailing - East German (now German) female shot
>> putters are a legend in their own hormone bloated biceps. This means
>> that in many events European nations aren't really competing against
>> each other.
>>
>> The US lacks such a diversity in sporting terms, although it is
>> impressive that their ladies football team won gold.
>>
D
Doofer
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:36:11 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Doofer wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:03:03 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>
>>> Which makes the US about 25% better than HIGUF. Or it could mean
>>> absolutely nothing. Either way...
>>
>> I consider it highly unlikely that the US would've doubled the size of
>> their medal haul if they sent 2.5 times the number of competitors to
>> the Sydney Olympics. Perhaps another ten medals at most.
>
>Well, yes, it would be difficult to -double- their count, but that's more
>because many of the additional wins would be in events they already took
>gold in, resulting in a Gold-Silver, where there was only a gold before.
>It's difficult to say how much the difference would be, since we're pretty
>much using the WAG method to project.
>
>> My conclusion is that Europe have a greater proportion of top class
>> athletes than the US.
>>
>> There may be good reasons.
>>
>> European nations have historically performed well in different
>> disciplines.
>>
>> The Brits are good at equestrian events and rowing, the French and
>> Dutch are good at sailing - East German (now German) female shot
>> putters are a legend in their own hormone bloated biceps. This means
>> that in many events European nations aren't really competing against
>> each other.
>>
>> The US lacks such a diversity in sporting terms, although it is
>> impressive that their ladies football team won gold.
>
>Add to it that popular US sports, with the exception of basketball, aren't
>olympic sports.
The same can be said of most nation's national sports:
Rugby and Cricket played in commonwealth countries aren't Olympic
sports.
Boule, played in France, is not an Olympic sport.
Sumo wrestling, played in Japan, is not an Olympic sport.
Kabadi, played in India, is not an Olympic sport.
Don't feel that the US is being victimised just because American
football and baseball aren't Olympic sports. Football is an olympic
sport because it is played globally - yet you won't see any
professional players from Europe taking part in the competition.
>Europe honors atheticism in all forms, in the US, it's
>Football (not soccer... well, there -is- Mia Hamm), Basketball, and
>Baseball... and the fat contracts and endorsements that go with it. If it's
>not one of the big three, it's not viewed as worth doing professionally,
>unless there happens to be a particularly attractive femme playing.
>
wrote:
>Doofer wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:03:03 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>
>>> Which makes the US about 25% better than HIGUF. Or it could mean
>>> absolutely nothing. Either way...
>>
>> I consider it highly unlikely that the US would've doubled the size of
>> their medal haul if they sent 2.5 times the number of competitors to
>> the Sydney Olympics. Perhaps another ten medals at most.
>
>Well, yes, it would be difficult to -double- their count, but that's more
>because many of the additional wins would be in events they already took
>gold in, resulting in a Gold-Silver, where there was only a gold before.
>It's difficult to say how much the difference would be, since we're pretty
>much using the WAG method to project.
>
>> My conclusion is that Europe have a greater proportion of top class
>> athletes than the US.
>>
>> There may be good reasons.
>>
>> European nations have historically performed well in different
>> disciplines.
>>
>> The Brits are good at equestrian events and rowing, the French and
>> Dutch are good at sailing - East German (now German) female shot
>> putters are a legend in their own hormone bloated biceps. This means
>> that in many events European nations aren't really competing against
>> each other.
>>
>> The US lacks such a diversity in sporting terms, although it is
>> impressive that their ladies football team won gold.
>
>Add to it that popular US sports, with the exception of basketball, aren't
>olympic sports.
The same can be said of most nation's national sports:
Rugby and Cricket played in commonwealth countries aren't Olympic
sports.
Boule, played in France, is not an Olympic sport.
Sumo wrestling, played in Japan, is not an Olympic sport.
Kabadi, played in India, is not an Olympic sport.
Don't feel that the US is being victimised just because American
football and baseball aren't Olympic sports. Football is an olympic
sport because it is played globally - yet you won't see any
professional players from Europe taking part in the competition.
>Europe honors atheticism in all forms, in the US, it's
>Football (not soccer... well, there -is- Mia Hamm), Basketball, and
>Baseball... and the fat contracts and endorsements that go with it. If it's
>not one of the big three, it's not viewed as worth doing professionally,
>unless there happens to be a particularly attractive femme playing.
>
D
Doofer
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:30:17 -0500, The Magnificent *******
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:59:51 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs the
>lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>whenever it's told -
>
>
>> The Magnificent ******* wrote:
>> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:04:45 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs
>> > the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>> > whenever it's told -
>> >
>> >
>> >> Doofer wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:03:41 -0400, "sanjian"
>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Considering what separates atheletes at that level, if you spam,
>> >>>> you will take more. The US is forced to leave behind many very
>> >>>> serious contenders, because of the size of our team. If we
>> >>>> decided that the US was going to send a team from every state, you
>> >>>> would hear alot of complaining from Europe.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why? Would that be because the UK doesn't send a team from every
>> >>> *country*?
>> >>
>> >> The EU does. The EU is nothing but the early stages of what the US
>> >> began as.
>> >
>> >
>> > It will never happen.
>> >
>> > How are they going to have a Boston Tea Party?
>>
>> They have plenty of lovely loches.
>>
>> I'm speaking more of the loss of soverignty than to any hope that the EU
>> actually be relevent.
>
>It's only a matter of time before the US decides to conquer Europe. It
>will definitely happen in the next 25 years.
It's happening already - there isn't a major European city without at
least one McDonalds, and there's barely a computer without Microsoft
products (albeit pirated in most cases).
Mind you, Hamburgers are a European invention, and the Internet
invented by a Brit.
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:59:51 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs the
>lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>whenever it's told -
>
>
>> The Magnificent ******* wrote:
>> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:04:45 -0400, in alt.tv.sopranos, sanjian rubs
>> > the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this
>> > whenever it's told -
>> >
>> >
>> >> Doofer wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:03:41 -0400, "sanjian"
>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Considering what separates atheletes at that level, if you spam,
>> >>>> you will take more. The US is forced to leave behind many very
>> >>>> serious contenders, because of the size of our team. If we
>> >>>> decided that the US was going to send a team from every state, you
>> >>>> would hear alot of complaining from Europe.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why? Would that be because the UK doesn't send a team from every
>> >>> *country*?
>> >>
>> >> The EU does. The EU is nothing but the early stages of what the US
>> >> began as.
>> >
>> >
>> > It will never happen.
>> >
>> > How are they going to have a Boston Tea Party?
>>
>> They have plenty of lovely loches.
>>
>> I'm speaking more of the loss of soverignty than to any hope that the EU
>> actually be relevent.
>
>It's only a matter of time before the US decides to conquer Europe. It
>will definitely happen in the next 25 years.
It's happening already - there isn't a major European city without at
least one McDonalds, and there's barely a computer without Microsoft
products (albeit pirated in most cases).
Mind you, Hamburgers are a European invention, and the Internet
invented by a Brit.
D
Doofer
Guest
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:47:13 -0400, "sanjian" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>And, yet, they are willing to give their soverignty over to the UN, and
>demand that we do the same. It took a civil war for the US to consider
>ourselves as a nation, and even longer than that in the south.
This comment is particularly telling.
The US expects other countries to adhere to the rules of the UN, but
somehow considers itself exempt.
Why should senior Yugoslavian soldiers be accountable to the
International Criminal Court, but not senior US soldiers?
wrote:
>And, yet, they are willing to give their soverignty over to the UN, and
>demand that we do the same. It took a civil war for the US to consider
>ourselves as a nation, and even longer than that in the south.
This comment is particularly telling.
The US expects other countries to adhere to the rules of the UN, but
somehow considers itself exempt.
Why should senior Yugoslavian soldiers be accountable to the
International Criminal Court, but not senior US soldiers?
F
Fx199
Guest
>>
>> Pathetic really.
>Whats pathetic is that you didnt read my location dipsh*t!
Didn't need to, with your condescending attitude, twit
>Subject: Re: What do Eurotards think about the United States dominating the
>Tour Le France
>From: byron27 [email protected]
>Date: 7/27/2004 9:06 PM US Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>
>Fx199 Wrote:
>> >
>> Who cares, dufus...That's not within living memory.
>>
>of course, that makes sense, everything that happened before you can
>remember doesnt matter. Ever heard of the saying "if you dont know your
>past you cant know your future"?. Do you wander around in circles at
>home wondering what to do next?
Pathetic, really
>> Pathetic really.
>Whats pathetic is that you didnt read my location dipsh*t!
Didn't need to, with your condescending attitude, twit
>Subject: Re: What do Eurotards think about the United States dominating the
>Tour Le France
>From: byron27 [email protected]
>Date: 7/27/2004 9:06 PM US Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>
>Fx199 Wrote:
>> >
>> Who cares, dufus...That's not within living memory.
>>
>of course, that makes sense, everything that happened before you can
>remember doesnt matter. Ever heard of the saying "if you dont know your
>past you cant know your future"?. Do you wander around in circles at
>home wondering what to do next?
Pathetic, really
