Cyclist14 said:What happened, is Tyler still banned for two years?
I hope not, all of us can be inspired by his 54 mile breakaway with a broken collarbone.
Cyclist14 said:What happened, is Tyler still banned for two years?
I hope not, all of us can be inspired by his 54 mile breakaway with a broken collarbone.
Haven't heard a word. It looks like his team is moving foward and trying to seperate themselves from him and any connection last year (three doping cases with Phonak riders).Powerful Pete said:Does anyone have any news what has happened?
Perro Loco said:UCI has also said they warned Phonak about flucuations in Tylers Blood values during the dauphine and tour of romandie.
I find it interesting that no info has come out period.
I suspect all this does not bode well for Tyler.
Since I don't want to be known as spreading rumoursPowerful Pete said:Thanks for the update. I had not heard about that little ' fluctuation ' thing you mention.
Hhhhm. My money is on his career ending rather sooner than expected.
Here is something from the UCI24.09
According to L'Equipe Tyler Hamilton (Usa) = Phonak was already warned ("yellow card") by the Medical Committee of the UCI after his final victory in the Tour de Romadie. They told him already about "strange fluctuations" in his blood-values.
Perro Loco said:Since I don't want to be known as spreading rumours
as reported in cycling4all
Here is something from the UCI
http://www.dailypeloton.com/uci_phonak_protourdecision.htm
about halfway down they talk about warning Phonak.
This is also mention of this in several other articles including an interview with **** pound in velonews.
I have never seen any details about this other than the UCI verified it warned Phonak and have never heard a response from Hamilton or Phonak.
Prior to this I was willing to give tyler the benefit of the doubt, new test ....
but unfortunately I think he may have been caught or else he must have one hell of an explanation.
Perro Loco said:Since I don't want to be known as spreading rumours
as reported in cycling4all
Here is something from the UCI
http://www.dailypeloton.com/uci_phonak_protourdecision.htm
about halfway down they talk about warning Phonak.
This is also mention of this in several other articles including an interview with **** pound in velonews.
I have never seen any details about this other than the UCI verified it warned Phonak and have never heard a response from Hamilton or Phonak.
Prior to this I was willing to give tyler the benefit of the doubt, new test ....
but unfortunately I think he may have been caught or else he must have one hell of an explanation.
hombredesubaru said:The only thing I can think of is that Tyler must be really stupid or really honest. Go figure, he and his team were already warned about fluctuations in his blood tests. So at that point if you are doing something wrong, you are close to getting caught and you stop, unless you are really dumb.
I wonder what parameters they were referring to that fluctuated? No details anywhere. Only a few days left in January when his appeal happens with the big boys.
Perro Loco said:You are welcome for the link. most likely flucuations in hematocrit, also variations in size of red cells and reticulocytes (young red cells) though these would be more suggestive of Epo or altitude.
This has been an overlooked part of the whole story.
I oftened wondered if the UCI kept an eye on people who showed fluctuations in their blood counts and targeted those people for more frequent tests or more out of competition tests.
I remember reading the TdF testers became suspicious of Rumsas when his hematocrit rose during the 2002 TdF from 46% start to 48% near the end.
(hematocrits without use of exogenous Erythropoietin decline during stage races due to plasma volume expansion). I always wondered if they tipped off the border patrol to search his wife car. Probably not, but the Hamilton Case and and an article I read recently in confirms the UCI is using longitudinal data to target individuals.
http://www.abc.net.au/sport/content/s1054499.htm
From what I have read you are correct.meb said:All the Olympic TT medalists were tested. Hamilton was probably targetted at Vuelta per the A positive from Athens. Perez didn't fail a test at Vuelta, even with his performance, yet Perez failed an out of competition test only two weeks later, so it is likely he was targetted for an initial test after Hamilton's Vuelta test (and perhaps other Phonak riders were also targetted).
Hey that sounds plenty cool! What's on the 'menu' for the trip? I guess that means no Vuelta for Tyler in 2005giantOCR said:I really hope they clear Tyler. He does a lot for Multiple Sclerosis, and myself and 39 other riders will be riding through the Pyrenees in September with Tyler after we raise money for MS. It's called the MS Global.