Road Cycling · Public discussion

What is funny ........

Started by Paul Berg · · Last activity · 1 post · 195 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
24 August 2007
Last activity
24 August 2007
Original author
Paul Berg
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
195
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. ~

    What is funny is that the clown Sam Adams, down at Portland's city hall,
    can always find the money for light rail, street cars, aerial trams,
    bike paths and a new bus mall, but to fix a pothole there is not a dime
    to be found.

    ~

    article from The (Portland) Oregonian - August 24, 2007

    Portlanders would be more likely to vote for new fees for transportation
    if the money would pay for synchronizing traffic signals, repairing
    Willamette River bridges and reducing conflicts between bicyclists and
    pedestrians.

    They would be less likely to support fees to install more speed bumps
    and red light cameras or to pave gravel streets.

    Those are some of the conclusions of a public opinion survey released
    Thursday by the Portland Office of Transportation. The Portland firm
    Davis, Hibbitts & Midghall conducted a telephone survey Aug. 15 for the
    city, contacting 900 likely voters. The margin of error was plus or
    minus 3.3 percentage points.

    The poll appears to lend support to a proposal by City Commissioner Sam
    Adams for new fees and taxes to pay for underfunded street maintenance.

    The city estimates it has a backlog of about $422 million in overdue
    street maintenance. Multnomah County estimates it has a $325 million
    backlog in bridge maintenance, including replacement of the Sellwood
    Bridge.

    "Portland voters want to prioritize their money on the backlog of
    maintenance and safety on streets and roads and bridges that are used by
    everybody," said Adams, who manages the city transportation office.

    Adams has proposed sending a package of new taxes and fees to voters in
    May, asking for money for street maintenance. Separately, the Metro
    Council and other governments in the Portland area are considering a
    ballot package for the November 2008 election that would provide money
    for construction of new roads and transit projects.

    Both efforts come as concern grows over a backlog in transportation
    projects nationwide. With gas tax rates holding at the same level since
    1993, inflation has chipped away at the spending power of transportation
    dollars in Oregon and across the nation. That has prompted states and
    local governments to consider raising money locally to pay for projects.

    The poll was conducted two weeks after an interstate bridge collapsed in
    Minneapolis.

    Linda Nettekoven, vice chairwoman of Hosford Abernethy Neighborhood
    Development Association, said she was glad the survey came so soon after
    the Minneapolis incident. The timing may have helped capture concern
    about bridge safety, said Nettekoven, a member of a committee studying
    the possibility of a proposal for the ballot.

    "It's interesting to know that people were concerned," she said. "When
    you added Willamette River bridges, support goes up. It's not generic
    bridges; it's the ones at the core of the city."

    The poll also found that most voters did not strongly oppose any of 23
    possible taxes or fees that might pay for transportation projects. It
    found that voters oppose a city gas tax of 5 cents a gallon but split on
    a 3 cent rate.

    A majority supports a street maintenance and safety fee that could be
    charged per household and per business. A majority also supports a
    graduated county vehicle registration fee, not to exceed $27 a year per
    vehicle.

    The survey also found support for promoting transit and penalizing
    owners of cars that use more gas. It did not ask voters whether they
    support widening existing streets.

    There's not enough money or political support to go there, Adams said.

    "There are few arterials in the city which we could expand without
    affecting the adjacent properties and communities," he said. "Not only
    would they be expensive, but imagine widening Sandy, Division, Belmont,
    Morrison. . . . There would be a lot of pushback."

    ~

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.