A
Andy Coggan
Guest
"Sam" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "warren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:030720041744487132%[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>, Sam
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is that TRAINING at altitude (in hypoxia) has not been
shown
> to
> > > be beneficial for sea level performance. It might be suitable for
> getting
> > > ready for competition at altitude. Say someone living in Missouri
> getting
> > > ready for a competition on Colorado might be well-served by some
> training in
> > > hypoxia.
Or Jan and I might just be screwing with peoples' heads. ;-)
> > > Jan has it backwards.
> >
> > The Tour requires some racing at altitude.
> >
> > -WG
>
> Very little in terms of overall time.
Or very much in terms of absolute altitude.
Andy Coggan
news:[email protected]...
>
> "warren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:030720041744487132%[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>, Sam
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is that TRAINING at altitude (in hypoxia) has not been
shown
> to
> > > be beneficial for sea level performance. It might be suitable for
> getting
> > > ready for competition at altitude. Say someone living in Missouri
> getting
> > > ready for a competition on Colorado might be well-served by some
> training in
> > > hypoxia.
Or Jan and I might just be screwing with peoples' heads. ;-)
> > > Jan has it backwards.
> >
> > The Tour requires some racing at altitude.
> >
> > -WG
>
> Very little in terms of overall time.
Or very much in terms of absolute altitude.
Andy Coggan