Originally posted by mmpc001
Wow - here we go again. Well, I could spend the next hour linking you to independent sites that disprove every one of your assertions about Atkins, but it's honestly not worth my time to do it AGAIN. Besides, you're so anti-low-carb anyway it wouldn't matter. We'll just have to agree to disagree. In parting, though, I'd like to suggest that instead of insulting people ("why don't you try reading a basic physiology book"), how about YOU actually read the Atkins book before you fly off and make all sorts of false, uneducated and vitriolic statments...
Now, have yourself a great day...
Human physiology has the last word on Atkins and that word isn't supportive of it. Your body simply wasn't designed to subsist on such a diet and if you force it, there are problems. It's your body. You do what you want to do but if you look into what your body's construction tells you about the foods it's intended to digest, you'll find Atkins is out the window.
Atkins works because the body isn't designed to make the most of that kind of diet. It effectively short-circuits the body's ability to extract the nutrients which is why the body then turns to burning fat for energy. It may be effective for weight loss but overall it's not a good thing.
Atkins books tend to be in favor of Atkins, (go figure). But if you look into man's teeth, saliva, salivary glands, skin, fingernails, digestive enzymes, digestive acids and the length, shape and routing of the digestive tract, you'll find that the Atkins books are full of misinformation.