wouldn't climate, economics, and other urban design characteristics
play and equal part?
i.e. if cul-de-sac ville super arterial suburbs have wonderful bike
paths, that still doesn't help me, because work commuting involves at
least a small portion or regular streets.
also if a town is LACKING in seperate bike paths, but still has wide
streets, bike lanes, (which you may or may not like), and a generally
good attitude towards cycling it would be more appealing (fort collins
is a good example, but maybe there's trails i don't know of)
i live in denver, and we have excellent trails, but the trail people
think i take to work actually goes far out of the way before wrapping
around to my work. much quicker to take nice quiet straight side
streets.
multiple connecting and interwoven trails are great, but i only use
trails on weekend rides. commuting to work, grocery store, and small
errands around town are all streets
just throwing that out there, i'm sure you know what you're doing