B
Bleve
Guest
MalP wrote:
> Bleve Wrote:
> > Walrus wrote:
> > > JoeD Wrote:
> > > > 3900 meters of climbing I'd love to try this ride, but I'm
> > curious as to the calculations of
> > > total ascent. If Bright (300m) to Hotham (1821m) = 1521m
> > > climbing...and Omeo (700m) to Hotham (1821m) = 1121m climbing...how
> > can
> > > the total ascent be as high as 3900? Sorry, but Audax doesn't have
> > much
> > > info on it. Which part am I missing?
> >
> > Hotham to Omeo includes 700m or so of climbing.
> > Omeo to Hotham, alas, is only 700m of descending (but they're ace
> > descents!) and rather a lot of climbing.I'm not sure that was mentioned in the fine print Carl ...
We are staying at the top, and there's only one way to get there
>
>
> --
> MalP
> Bleve Wrote:
> > Walrus wrote:
> > > JoeD Wrote:
> > > > 3900 meters of climbing I'd love to try this ride, but I'm
> > curious as to the calculations of
> > > total ascent. If Bright (300m) to Hotham (1821m) = 1521m
> > > climbing...and Omeo (700m) to Hotham (1821m) = 1121m climbing...how
> > can
> > > the total ascent be as high as 3900? Sorry, but Audax doesn't have
> > much
> > > info on it. Which part am I missing?
> >
> > Hotham to Omeo includes 700m or so of climbing.
> > Omeo to Hotham, alas, is only 700m of descending (but they're ace
> > descents!) and rather a lot of climbing.I'm not sure that was mentioned in the fine print Carl ...
We are staying at the top, and there's only one way to get there
>
>
> --
> MalP