S
Sniper8052(L96A1)
Guest
Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When I
log in none of the messages have been updated.
Sniper8052
log in none of the messages have been updated.
Sniper8052
J
Just zis Guy, you know?
Guest
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 11:45:11 GMT, "Sniper8052(L96A1)"
<[email protected]> wrote in message
<[email protected]>:
>Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site?
Um, site? This is Usenet!
Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
<[email protected]> wrote in message
<[email protected]>:
>Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site?
Um, site? This is Usenet!
Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
C
Call me Bob
Guest
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 11:45:11 GMT, "Sniper8052(L96A1)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When I
>log in none of the messages have been updated.
>Sniper8052
URC site? This is a usenet group, we don't have a site.
--
Call me "Bob"
"More oneness, less categories,
Open hearts, no strategies"
Email address is spam trapped, to reply directly remove the beverage.
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When I
>log in none of the messages have been updated.
>Sniper8052
URC site? This is a usenet group, we don't have a site.
--
Call me "Bob"
"More oneness, less categories,
Open hearts, no strategies"
Email address is spam trapped, to reply directly remove the beverage.
P
Peter B
Guest
"Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When I
> log in none of the messages have been updated.
Situation normal. You could try another newserver and/or Google groups. I
often receive posts long after they were sent or only the replies to the OP
but not the OP.
Anyone more technically proficient able to make recommendations for
improvement?
TIA,
Pete
news:[email protected]...
> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When I
> log in none of the messages have been updated.
Situation normal. You could try another newserver and/or Google groups. I
often receive posts long after they were sent or only the replies to the OP
but not the OP.
Anyone more technically proficient able to make recommendations for
improvement?
TIA,
Pete
P
Pete Biggs
Guest
Peter B wrote:
> "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When
>> I log in none of the messages have been updated.
Try "resetting" your software.
> Situation normal. You could try another newserver and/or Google
> groups. I often receive posts long after they were sent or only the
> replies to the OP but not the OP.
>
> Anyone more technically proficient able to make recommendations for
> improvement?
Use the free news.individual.net server--very reliable and quick, messages
usually appear within seconds of posting.
See http://www.individual.net
~PB
> "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When
>> I log in none of the messages have been updated.
Try "resetting" your software.
> Situation normal. You could try another newserver and/or Google
> groups. I often receive posts long after they were sent or only the
> replies to the OP but not the OP.
>
> Anyone more technically proficient able to make recommendations for
> improvement?
Use the free news.individual.net server--very reliable and quick, messages
usually appear within seconds of posting.
See http://www.individual.net
~PB
S
Simon Brooke
Guest
in message <[email protected]>, Sniper805
(L96A1) ('[email protected]') wrote:
> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When I
> log in none of the messages have been updated.
There is no URC site. Usenet doesn't work like that; it's a
store-and-forward network. It sounds as if your local server (most
likely your ISP's news server) isn't accepting messages; there could be
a lot of reasons for this (not enough bandwidth, not enough disk,
broken software...). If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
news.individual.net.
--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; If Python is executable pseudocode,
;; then Perl is executable line noise
-- seen on Slashdot.
(L96A1) ('[email protected]') wrote:
> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When I
> log in none of the messages have been updated.
There is no URC site. Usenet doesn't work like that; it's a
store-and-forward network. It sounds as if your local server (most
likely your ISP's news server) isn't accepting messages; there could be
a lot of reasons for this (not enough bandwidth, not enough disk,
broken software...). If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
news.individual.net.
--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; If Python is executable pseudocode,
;; then Perl is executable line noise
-- seen on Slashdot.
D
Dave Kahn
Guest
Simon Brooke wrote:
> There is no URC site. Usenet doesn't work like that; it's a
> store-and-forward network. It sounds as if your local server (most
> likely your ISP's news server) isn't accepting messages; there could be
> a lot of reasons for this (not enough bandwidth, not enough disk,
> broken software...). If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
> news.individual.net.
For people, like me, on BlueYonder the news server given in the set-up
documentation - news.blueyonder.co.uk - is very patchy. There is,
however, the text-only alternative news-text.blueyonder.co.uk. This is
orders of magnitude better as long as you don't need to access the
newsgroups that carry binaries.
--
Dave...
Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the
future of the human race. - H. G. Wells
> There is no URC site. Usenet doesn't work like that; it's a
> store-and-forward network. It sounds as if your local server (most
> likely your ISP's news server) isn't accepting messages; there could be
> a lot of reasons for this (not enough bandwidth, not enough disk,
> broken software...). If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
> news.individual.net.
For people, like me, on BlueYonder the news server given in the set-up
documentation - news.blueyonder.co.uk - is very patchy. There is,
however, the text-only alternative news-text.blueyonder.co.uk. This is
orders of magnitude better as long as you don't need to access the
newsgroups that carry binaries.
--
Dave...
Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the
future of the human race. - H. G. Wells
S
Sniper8052(L96A1)
Guest
Dave Kahn wrote:
> Simon Brooke wrote:
>
>> There is no URC site. Usenet doesn't work like that; it's a
>> store-and-forward network. It sounds as if your local server (most
>> likely your ISP's news server) isn't accepting messages; there could be
>> a lot of reasons for this (not enough bandwidth, not enough disk,
>> broken software...). If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
>> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
>> news.individual.net.
>
>
> For people, like me, on BlueYonder the news server given in the set-up
> documentation - news.blueyonder.co.uk - is very patchy. There is,
> however, the text-only alternative news-text.blueyonder.co.uk. This is
> orders of magnitude better as long as you don't need to access the
> newsgroups that carry binaries.
>
Ah yes blueyonder those bastions of reliability. Though the messages
were appearing in my firefox windows sometime later (5-8 hours) they
weren't appearing on the internet. Will have a look at
http://www.individual.net to see if I can get a faster feed.
Thanks all
Sniper8052.
> Simon Brooke wrote:
>
>> There is no URC site. Usenet doesn't work like that; it's a
>> store-and-forward network. It sounds as if your local server (most
>> likely your ISP's news server) isn't accepting messages; there could be
>> a lot of reasons for this (not enough bandwidth, not enough disk,
>> broken software...). If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
>> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
>> news.individual.net.
>
>
> For people, like me, on BlueYonder the news server given in the set-up
> documentation - news.blueyonder.co.uk - is very patchy. There is,
> however, the text-only alternative news-text.blueyonder.co.uk. This is
> orders of magnitude better as long as you don't need to access the
> newsgroups that carry binaries.
>
Ah yes blueyonder those bastions of reliability. Though the messages
were appearing in my firefox windows sometime later (5-8 hours) they
weren't appearing on the internet. Will have a look at
http://www.individual.net to see if I can get a faster feed.
Thanks all
Sniper8052.
P
Peter B
Guest
"Simon Brooke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
> news.individual.net.
Thanks Simon, so do I now.
My news.individual.net acount has retrieved 8 posts re this thread whereas
my BT account has only retrieved
6, I'll see if that's the general trend.
Pete
news:[email protected]...
>If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
> news.individual.net.
Thanks Simon, so do I now.
My news.individual.net acount has retrieved 8 posts re this thread whereas
my BT account has only retrieved
6, I'll see if that's the general trend.
Pete
P
Peter B
Guest
"Peter B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Simon Brooke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
> > would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
> > news.individual.net.
>
> Thanks Simon, so do I now.
> My news.individual.net acount has retrieved 8 posts re this thread whereas
> my BT account has only retrieved
> 6, I'll see if that's the general trend.
A quick poll shows no "Re:" messages in the individual account and masses in
the BT account.
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Simon Brooke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
> > would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
> > news.individual.net.
>
> Thanks Simon, so do I now.
> My news.individual.net acount has retrieved 8 posts re this thread whereas
> my BT account has only retrieved
> 6, I'll see if that's the general trend.
A quick poll shows no "Re:" messages in the individual account and masses in
the BT account.
S
Simon Brooke
Guest
in message <[email protected]>, Peter B
('[email protected]') wrote:
>
> "Simon Brooke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
>> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
>> news.individual.net.
>
> Thanks Simon, so do I now.
> My news.individual.net acount has retrieved 8 posts re this thread
> whereas my BT account has only retrieved
> 6, I'll see if that's the general trend.
OK, but there is a subsidiary point here. You (and I) are paying BT to
provide us with a service - namely an NNTP news server - which BT are
failing to provide. Instead of hassling BT to deliver on their contract
we're freeloading off a German academic institution, which means
ultimately freeloading off the German taxpayer.
I think there's some degree of moral obligation on us either to kick
some butt at BT until they do deliver an adequate service, to find a
reliable commercial Usenet provider, or to start to rebuild the
informal peer-to-peer network which Usenet grew out of.
--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
There are no messages. The above is just a random stream of
bytes. Any opinion or meaning you find in it is your own creation.
('[email protected]') wrote:
>
> "Simon Brooke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>If your ISP's news server is ****, one solution
>> would be to get an account with a different server; many of us use
>> news.individual.net.
>
> Thanks Simon, so do I now.
> My news.individual.net acount has retrieved 8 posts re this thread
> whereas my BT account has only retrieved
> 6, I'll see if that's the general trend.
OK, but there is a subsidiary point here. You (and I) are paying BT to
provide us with a service - namely an NNTP news server - which BT are
failing to provide. Instead of hassling BT to deliver on their contract
we're freeloading off a German academic institution, which means
ultimately freeloading off the German taxpayer.
I think there's some degree of moral obligation on us either to kick
some butt at BT until they do deliver an adequate service, to find a
reliable commercial Usenet provider, or to start to rebuild the
informal peer-to-peer network which Usenet grew out of.
--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
There are no messages. The above is just a random stream of
bytes. Any opinion or meaning you find in it is your own creation.
T
Tony Raven
Guest
Simon Brooke wrote:
>
> OK, but there is a subsidiary point here. You (and I) are paying BT to
> provide us with a service - namely an NNTP news server - which BT are
> failing to provide.
Its probably their safe surfing filters blocking any mention of spoke
nipples that's doing it ;-)
Tony
>
> OK, but there is a subsidiary point here. You (and I) are paying BT to
> provide us with a service - namely an NNTP news server - which BT are
> failing to provide.
Its probably their safe surfing filters blocking any mention of spoke
nipples that's doing it ;-)
Tony
C
Carol Hague
Guest
Simon Brooke <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, but there is a subsidiary point here. You (and I) are paying BT to
> provide us with a service - namely an NNTP news server - which BT are
> failing to provide. Instead of hassling BT to deliver on their contract
> we're freeloading off a German academic institution, which means
> ultimately freeloading off the German taxpayer.
Personally I'd be quite happy to pay for the news.individual.net service
if there was any way to do so - would they accept an envelope containing
leftover holiday Euros d'you think?
--
Carol
"Mmmmooooowooooff!" - the Moobark, "The Treacle People"
> OK, but there is a subsidiary point here. You (and I) are paying BT to
> provide us with a service - namely an NNTP news server - which BT are
> failing to provide. Instead of hassling BT to deliver on their contract
> we're freeloading off a German academic institution, which means
> ultimately freeloading off the German taxpayer.
Personally I'd be quite happy to pay for the news.individual.net service
if there was any way to do so - would they accept an envelope containing
leftover holiday Euros d'you think?
--
Carol
"Mmmmooooowooooff!" - the Moobark, "The Treacle People"
D
Dave Kahn
Guest
Sniper8052(L96A1) wrote:
> Ah yes blueyonder those bastions of reliability. Though the messages
> were appearing in my firefox windows sometime later (5-8 hours) they
> weren't appearing on the internet. Will have a look at
> http://www.individual.net to see if I can get a faster feed.
> Thanks all
> Sniper8052.
I can't say I've had any problems of that sort - just that the default
news server becomes unavailable every few minutes. The text only one
seems fine most of the time though it did disappear for a while the
other day.
--
Dave...
Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the
future of the human race. - H. G. Wells
> Ah yes blueyonder those bastions of reliability. Though the messages
> were appearing in my firefox windows sometime later (5-8 hours) they
> weren't appearing on the internet. Will have a look at
> http://www.individual.net to see if I can get a faster feed.
> Thanks all
> Sniper8052.
I can't say I've had any problems of that sort - just that the default
news server becomes unavailable every few minutes. The text only one
seems fine most of the time though it did disappear for a while the
other day.
--
Dave...
Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the
future of the human race. - H. G. Wells
W
Peter B wrote:
> "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When
>> I log in none of the messages have been updated.
Try "resetting" your software.
> Situation normal. You could try another newserver and/or Google
> groups. I often receive posts long after they were sent or only the
> replies to the OP but not the OP.
> Anyone more technically proficient able to make recommendations for
> improvement?
Use the free news.individual.net server--very reliable and quick,
messages
usually appear within seconds of posting.
See http://www.individual.net
~PB
I went to the site but you have 'name your browser'. I use mozilla but
it was not one of the browser options...........I emailed them to tell
them I was not going to give them my email address but the joked
backfired I think.....
ps....with this new google groups page I have pasted the post I am
replying to because when I used the 'reply' option before my post
appeared by itself without the 'context'.
Sean.......
> "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Has anyone else had problems reading messages on the URC site? When
>> I log in none of the messages have been updated.
Try "resetting" your software.
> Situation normal. You could try another newserver and/or Google
> groups. I often receive posts long after they were sent or only the
> replies to the OP but not the OP.
> Anyone more technically proficient able to make recommendations for
> improvement?
Use the free news.individual.net server--very reliable and quick,
messages
usually appear within seconds of posting.
See http://www.individual.net
~PB
I went to the site but you have 'name your browser'. I use mozilla but
it was not one of the browser options...........I emailed them to tell
them I was not going to give them my email address but the joked
backfired I think.....
ps....with this new google groups page I have pasted the post I am
replying to because when I used the 'reply' option before my post
appeared by itself without the 'context'.
Sean.......
D
dkahn400
Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> ps....with this new google groups page I have pasted the post
> I am replying to because when I used the 'reply' option before
> my post appeared by itself without the 'context'.
Before composing your reply click "Preview" then click "Edit" and the
context will appear although it'll be a terrible mess that you'll have
to reformat manually. There'll also be a blank line at the top for you
to remove - it appears that GG2 is encouraging top posting.
--
Dave...
> ps....with this new google groups page I have pasted the post
> I am replying to because when I used the 'reply' option before
> my post appeared by itself without the 'context'.
Before composing your reply click "Preview" then click "Edit" and the
context will appear although it'll be a terrible mess that you'll have
to reformat manually. There'll also be a blank line at the top for you
to remove - it appears that GG2 is encouraging top posting.
--
Dave...
N
NC
Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Peter B wrote:
> > Use the free news.individual.net server--very reliable and quick,
> > messages
> > usually appear within seconds of posting.
> > See http://www.individual.net
> > ~PB
>
> I went to the site but you have 'name your browser'. I use mozilla but
> it was not one of the browser options....
Well lie, and say IE5
Its not as if one uses a browser to access a newsgroup. Anything which will
do the news protocols will work; the Mozilla newsreader, Outlook Express,
Netscape, or (I guess) even vn !
> .......I emailed them to tell
> them I was not going to give them my email address but the joked
> backfired I think.....
I guess so
They are fine with your email address; all they want it for is to issue you
with a username and password pair so that you can post messages. There is no
suggestion they will spam you.
- Nigel (been using www.individual.net for years).
--
NC - Webmaster for http://www.2mm.org.uk/
Replies to newsgroup postings to the newsgroup please.
> Peter B wrote:
> > Use the free news.individual.net server--very reliable and quick,
> > messages
> > usually appear within seconds of posting.
> > See http://www.individual.net
> > ~PB
>
> I went to the site but you have 'name your browser'. I use mozilla but
> it was not one of the browser options....
Well lie, and say IE5
Its not as if one uses a browser to access a newsgroup. Anything which will
do the news protocols will work; the Mozilla newsreader, Outlook Express,
Netscape, or (I guess) even vn !
> .......I emailed them to tell
> them I was not going to give them my email address but the joked
> backfired I think.....
I guess so
They are fine with your email address; all they want it for is to issue you
with a username and password pair so that you can post messages. There is no
suggestion they will spam you.
- Nigel (been using www.individual.net for years).
--
NC - Webmaster for http://www.2mm.org.uk/
Replies to newsgroup postings to the newsgroup please.