On 28 Feb 2008 23:33:31 GMT,
[email protected] wrote:
>Michael Baldwin wrote:
>
>> Alex, I think your tutorials in general, would inspire novice tuners
>> to at least give it a try. If that's your main objective, your
>> "tutes" are on target. No bullseyes but definitely on target.
>
>> One note. Whenever referencing wheels, I prefer drive and non-drive
>> side versus right or left.
>
>Oh? Why do you prefer obscure jargon when left and right are
>unambiguous. This use becomes worse because, being wordy, it leads to
>acronyms that are more obscure, DS/NDS. This is part of the "sloppy
>English is good" thread on this newsgroup.
>
>Jobst Brandt
Dear Jobst,
Other posters may not know that you're mistaken, so it's worth
explaining yet again.
As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, there are stunt bicycles
being sold today with the drive on the left side, not the right:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/adfadf06467f4d44
And left-hand drive bicycles were made in the past--here's the Ivel
safety with its front spoon brake on the right and its drive on the
non-traditional left side:
http://www.oldroads.com/pqdb_img.asp?p=fdbdown.asp?707&mod=&mak=Ivel
In any case, what matters is which side has the drive, not which side
it happens to be, so drive and non-drive are always accurate and
require no one to think about how a bare wheel would go into a frame.
Come to think of it, things would get rather tricky with a flip-flop
hub, wouldn't they? Drive and non-drive side change, just as left and
right do.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel