I've been running the Wheelism website for exactly a year now, and apart from odd/funny cycling stories from around the UK, have been recording news about accidents on the road resulting in the death of a cyclist.
Well, on the first birthday of the site I've counted 51 cyclist deaths directly attributable to collsions with other vehicles (cars, lorries, tractors....) - see the "Another One Bites The Dust" section
And these results are for the UK only!!!
(and I've probably missed some)
QUESTION 1: Am I alone in thinking this figure is insanely high?
One thing I've noticed on my rather macabre meanderings through local UK newspapers is the way cycling deaths are reported. It's always....
"A cyclist was killed in a collision with a car" and never "A cyclist was killed when a driver collided with him" - the emphasis (possibly very slight) always appears to be against the cyclist i.e. that the cyclist caused the accident. Of course, this just may be some inherent psychological bias in the way I'm interpreting the news stories, but it's a recurring one, whatever.
QUESTION 2: Given that I've been running the site for a year, and that some of you might even have visited it, does anyone have suggestions on how I might improve the site, comments about what you like, or would like to see etc.
Cheers,
Wheelist
Well, on the first birthday of the site I've counted 51 cyclist deaths directly attributable to collsions with other vehicles (cars, lorries, tractors....) - see the "Another One Bites The Dust" section
And these results are for the UK only!!!
(and I've probably missed some)
QUESTION 1: Am I alone in thinking this figure is insanely high?
One thing I've noticed on my rather macabre meanderings through local UK newspapers is the way cycling deaths are reported. It's always....
"A cyclist was killed in a collision with a car" and never "A cyclist was killed when a driver collided with him" - the emphasis (possibly very slight) always appears to be against the cyclist i.e. that the cyclist caused the accident. Of course, this just may be some inherent psychological bias in the way I'm interpreting the news stories, but it's a recurring one, whatever.
QUESTION 2: Given that I've been running the site for a year, and that some of you might even have visited it, does anyone have suggestions on how I might improve the site, comments about what you like, or would like to see etc.
Cheers,
Wheelist