Quote: Originally Posted by alienator
Yep, I responded to dhk2. The was response was to what he said, not you. See, in a thread when there are multiple participants, you can respond to any one without responding to the others. it's really simple, old man.
What?
Well, your circular deflecting lamentation is
cute ...
So many attempts at misdirection & deflection ...
- I think the Administration will be looking for a new Press Secretary in the near future ... and, YOU should probably put yourself up for consideration ...
Is your lamentation YOUR version of what can only be considered to be a non-cogent response?
WHAT WAS THIS EARLIER STATEMENT WHICH
YOU MADE SUPPOSED TO MEAN IF YOU WEREN'T PUTTING THE CHART FORWARD AS BEING MORE THAN WHAT WE CAN ONLY NOW CONSIDER TO BE PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC?
- Perhaps you are just unable to understand what that data means. The difference between what was once done and what is done now is that data supports what is done now.
If you don't think that a post which can be considered to be re-enforcing a point which someone else has made which had been made in response to particular post isn't also essentially a reply to the recipient of said post, well then perhaps you shouldn't post any more equivalents of a '+1', implied or actual, in the future.
Quote: Originally Posted by alienator
I haven't disavowed anything that I've said in this thread. You can't find a single instance of me disavowing anything I've said in this thread.
[COLOR= rgb(24, 24, 24)]You're decompensating, girlfriend. It might be time for you to take a sedative.[/COLOR]
You cannot remember not remembering!?!
Again, your deflecting lamentation & churlish attack is more
cute than not ... very much like what one would expect of a kindergartner.
Quote: Originally Posted by alienator
Please have the balls to actually say the words, alfie, instead of leaving things like this: ________.
REALLY?!?
WHY?
Too many options for you to consider?
- You can use the following to make a finite list of all the possibilities which YOU can think of for adjectives which you have heard or read other use to describe YOU in the past ...
- 1. ______________
- 2. ______________
- 3. ______________
- 4. ______________
- 5. ______________
- 6. ______________
- 7. ______________
- 8. ______________
- 9. ______________
- 10. ______________
- 11. ______________
- 12. ______________
- 13. ______________
- 14. ______________
- 15. ______________
- 16. ______________
- 17. ______________
- 18. ______________
- 19. ______________
- 20. ______________
- 21. ALL OF THE ABOVE
After filling in all of the possibilities, choose option '21'.
Failure on YOUR part to fill out all of the blanks simply re-enforces the fact that you are best described as a hypocritical
_____.