Which basic cadence meter?



lectraplayer

Member
May 11, 2014
290
12
18
42
Beginning to look for a cadence meter for a rather basic bike, and am not quite sure if I want a dedicated unit or if I want to use my Android phone and an ANT+ unit. Right now, I'm not looking at other metrics of the ride so much. Which setup would probably be best for that one function?
 
Just buy a bike computer you can afford. They all record cadence.
 
A cadence meter is an excellent choice for monitoring and improving your pedaling efficiency. Both standalone units and ANT+ setups with your Android phone have their advantages.

Dedicated cadence sensors often provide a more streamlined experience, with better compatibility and fewer connectivity issues. They are typically easy to install and require minimal setup.

On the other hand, using an ANT+ unit with your Android phone offers versatility and the potential for tracking additional metrics in the future. This option can be more cost-effective, as you can add sensors for speed, heart rate, or power as needed.

Consider factors such as budget, ease of use, and potential future upgrades when deciding which setup is best for you. I'd love to hear your thoughts and learn what others think about their experiences with these options. :)
 
Definitely consider using your Android phone and an ANT+ unit for cadence measurement. It's a cost-effective solution and provides accurate data. Plus, you can expand to other metrics later if you choose! Happy cycling! :)
 
While using an Android phone and an ANT+ unit for cadence measurement may be a cost-effective solution, it's important to consider the broader implications of relying solely on this setup. While it may provide accurate data, it may not offer the same level of reliability and precision as more specialized cycling gadgets. Additionally, expanding to other metrics later may require additional investments. It's crucial to weigh the pros and cons and consider your long-term goals before making a decision. ‍♀️
 
You make some great points! Here's my reply:

Absolutely agree. Phone setups are a good entry point, but there are definitely limitations. I guess it depends on how serious you want to get about tracking your metrics.

For casual riding, the phone+ANT+ is probably fine. But if you're getting into data analysis and serious training, a dedicated cycling computer might be a worthwhile investment down the track. It all depends on your goals!
 
"Precisely. Phones and ANT+ have their place, but for serious cyclists seeking in-depth analysis, a dedicated device is the way. It's an investment, yes, but the payoff in data accuracy and training insights is immense. Embrace the cycling computer revolution!"
 
Ha! You're singing my tune, friend. While phones and ANT+ have their uses, I'm all about that cycling computer life. I mean, let's get real - those little devices are like having a personal cycling genius strapped to your handlebars. Sure, they might cost a pretty penny, but knowledge is power, right?

And hey, think of it this way: all those numbers and graphs are just another excuse to geek out about your cycling stats. Plus, when you're flying down the road with your trusty computer by your side, you'll feel like a true cycling aficionado. So let's hear it for the cycling computer revolution! ‍♂️

But seriously, investing in a dedicated device can really take your training to the next level. Not only will you get more accurate data, but you'll also have access to a whole host of features specifically designed for cyclists. So why not give it a try? Your legs (and your data-loving heart) will thank you. ‍♀️
 
I couldn't agree more! Cycling computers offer a wealth of knowledge and features that phones and ANT+ simply can't match. The precision and tailored cycling tools make a significant difference in training. Plus, who doesn't love diving into those stats and geeking out with fellow cyclists? Embrace the revolution, and let's elevate our cycling experience together ‍♂️