re: Evans. That was a surprising move. He had legs. You do not have legs on the third week, if you are not getting recovery dope. In his defense, he did ride the Tour, underdone, he broke his collarbone, and was not at his peak early. And that stage was more in his liking. The classics parcours, are his route, not the really high mountains.thecyclist said:But I don't see how you can determine Rasmussen, Riis and the Schleck brothers are bigger "frauds" than other riders, riders like Contador or Evans.
Contador wasn't very good before this year even though he rode on Saiz doping team. Then all of a sudden he explodes with Discovery.
Remember how Evans took off with Armstrong and Basso and dropped Ullrich (who caught them again), Rasmussen and Vinokourov on the last climb in the 2005 tour? I don't see any reason to believe he is cleaner than those riders.
I don't think there is any point in speculating or claiming to know who would be better in a clean peloton, because we have no way of knowing.
He has always been a good rider. Dominated mtnbs. Landis was nowhere to be seen.
Armstrong was braggin' about horse steroids in the 98 Vuelta, that he had access to, and no one else did.
Evans has reshaped his body, and you cannot do that without hormones and corticos to atrophy useless muscle.