Why do cars hate us so much

[flyingdutch]

The best reply to raging I have used so far which left the person totally blank was
"I can ID you buckaroo! you have no idea who I am. So the only person with anything to lose here is you"

simple but damn effective as there is no comeback to it.

 

[Drs]

flyingdutch <[email protected]> wrote in
message [email protected]
> Drs wrote: When I last had this argument in aus.cars they
> got heartily sick of the words "consolidated revenue". I
> only had to post the relevant section of the Act about
> fifty times before it sank in but in the end I did get
> through to them that rego does *not* pay for roads.
>
> Can you post that act here. wouldnt mind loading that one
> into the long- term memory banks

This is for Victoria:

Road Safety Act 1986 PART 2--REGISTRATION Division 2--
Registration
5. Purposes of registration

The purposes of registration are--

(a) to ensure that the design, construction and equipment of
motor vehicles and trailers which are used on a highway
meet safety and environmental standards; and

(b) to enable the use of motor vehicles and trailers on
highways to be regulated for reasons of safety,
protection of the environment and law enforcement; and

(c) to provide a method of establishing the identity of each
motor vehicle or trailer which is used on a highway and
of the person who is responsible for it.

> good to see you smiling...

Threw you all, didn't it...

--

d: Top-posters.
e: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[Drs]

flyingdutch <[email protected]> wrote in
message [email protected]
> Drs wrote:
> > It's not an obsession, it's just a signature.
>
> yeah, but it is rather dictatorial Drs. After seeing for
> the millionth time, I get it (except before coffee-
> insertion )

99% of Usenet posts have a signature. Once setup they take
not effort at all to insert.

> you certainly come up with some amazing highly literate
> posts. howzabout changing the sig for a while?

I could use OE-Quotefix to rotate the signature through a
quotes file but first I'd have to get a suitable quotes
file. In the meantime, given the number of new top-posters
infesting this group, it's clear that the message is not yet
universal.

--

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

 

[Drs]

cfsmtb <[email protected]> wrote in message
[email protected]
> John Retchford wrote:
> > An anal fixation as well as obsessive behaviour?
>
> *cough*
>
> ahem, be a gentleman.

I thought you only coughed when the doctor was holding your
wobbly bits?

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[Drs]

Rob & Shel <[email protected]> wrote in message
[email protected]

[...]

> did...I accused him of being of being of being a small-
> pricked ego tripping tonka toy asshole who thinks he
> owns the road & has got serious personal issues, that
> he should see a shrink),

Hang on... I can't write that fast...

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?