> I've been thinking about this, since I'm about to be traveling for almost
> 3 months, without my own bike:
>
> http://washcycle.typepad.com/home/2007/04/why_does_is_cos.html
>
> Seems absurd, doesn't it?
>
> Matt O.
Inefficiency, pure & simple. Rental cars live their life on the road;
utilization is very high. Plus, cars are insured (by everyone down the line
on a rental) while bikes are not. Add the fact that used bikes get a much
lower fraction of their cost returned than used cars. Then look at how many
different sizes are needed for a bike rental fleet. It starts to get ugly
fast. And finally, there's that "treat it like a rental" mentality. Cars
command more respect from their users than bikes do. Basically, a lot of
people just don't take bikes (and the damage they might do to one)
seriously, while they know full well that even a minor fender ding is going
to cost them several hundred dollars.
But pretty much all of that was covered in the article you referenced.
--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com