"Tamyka Bell" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
> PiledHigher wrote:
> >
> > Tamyka Bell Wrote:
> > > Unregistered wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "40ish" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Why is it that I have never seen a roadie have a bell on his bike.
> > > > > Everyone else has them to warn pedestrians.
> > > > >
> > > > > So why is it that Road bikes are excempt from this ????
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Because it looks pathetic.....and every gram of weight counts.
> > >
> > > Then go on a diet and stick the bell on your bike.
> > >
> > > T
> >
> > No self respecting cyclist has one on there bike as they are as useful
> > as a chocolate teapot.
> >
> > Your voice is louder and able to convey more information.
> >
> > --
> > PiledHigher
>
>
> Oh yeah, and where do you get off having a VALID argument for not having
> a bell? What, you don't have it because you wouldn't use it... can't you
> at least say because it's so massively not aero or it weighs too much or
> it upsets the balance on your steering? What's with a valid argument on
> usenet? I thought that didn't happen!
>
> Really, who can argue that a gram of weight on a bike makes a difference
> when your bodymass fluctuates at least a kilo per day anyway.
>
> Comment came up on weekend ride when we saw a woman with a really,
> really expensive bike and a really, really bad fit: all the gear, no
> idea.
>
> So true. One of my mates just bought a really expensive trek and boasted
> to me about how light it was. Thing is, he's 100kg and I'm 60kg. Is the
> bike weight going to make a significant difference? I thought maybe he
> should get back to his healthy 80kg instead of spending $5000 on a new
> bike...
>
> T
Hey.....what's wrong with weighing 100kg?? Just means I can go faster up
hills........you must have heard that one from the PTIs during a route march
up hill that goes "lean into it and let the hill do the work".
But seriously.....we all know that Work = mgh (ie. mass x gravitational
force x height) so if I want to gain say 100m of elevation I need to do
approx W = 115kg x 9.8m/s^2 x 100 = 112.7 kJ of work (taking bike, clothes,
waterbottle to weigh approx 15kg). I actually need to do more work than
this as I need to overcome frictional losses in the drivetrain, hubs, tyres,
etc as well as air resistance (which goes up in proportion to the speed
squared).
I can work out required power by dividing by the time taken to do it.
So if it takes me 5 minutes, then I need to put out 112700/300 = 375.66
Watts = approx 0.5hp. (1 hp = 746W)
So if I want to climb 100m in 5 minutes then I only need to be putting out
as much power as half a horse......"Heyyyyy thereeee Willlbuurrrr......."
Ride On,
Gags (Who can remember something from physics if he tries really hard)