Why drivers really hate cyclists



G

General Easterly

Guest
Link (http://tinyurl.com/fybbc) to a piece from the opposite end of
Wales to me. Yesterdays front page poll was "Are cyclists dangerous".

Can we guess what the result was???
 
Douglas Steel wrote:
> 74 votes
> 111 votes


Well, that's conclusive then.

d.
 
davek wrote:
> Douglas Steel wrote:
>> 74 votes
>> 111 votes

>
> Well, that's conclusive then.
>


But no doubt someone will say only 111 people out of 60.4 million said
that cyclists were not a danger ;-)


--
Tony

"The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
right."
- Lord Hailsham
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> davek wrote:
> > Douglas Steel wrote:
> >> 74 votes
> >> 111 votes

> >
> > Well, that's conclusive then.
> >

>
> But no doubt someone will say only 111 people out of 60.4 million said
> that cyclists were not a danger ;-)


They really are quite fecund in wales.. I could have sworn the
population was only around 1.5 million females a couple of years ago
(and 1.4M males..).

...d

>
>
> --
> Tony
>
> "The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
> right."
> - Lord Hailsham
 
David Martin wrote:
> Tony Raven wrote:
>> davek wrote:
>>> Douglas Steel wrote:
>>>> 74 votes
>>>> 111 votes
>>> Well, that's conclusive then.
>>>

>> But no doubt someone will say only 111 people out of 60.4 million said
>> that cyclists were not a danger ;-)

>
> They really are quite fecund in wales.. I could have sworn the
> population was only around 1.5 million females a couple of years ago
> (and 1.4M males..).
>


Offa's Dyke cease to be an effective segregation from the United
Kingdom` centuries ago although I know some locals still think otherwise ;-)

--
Tony

"The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
right."
- Lord Hailsham
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> David Martin wrote:
>> Tony Raven wrote:
>>> davek wrote:
>>>> Douglas Steel wrote:
>>>>> 74 votes
>>>>> 111 votes
>>>> Well, that's conclusive then.
>>>>
>>> But no doubt someone will say only 111 people out of 60.4 million
>>> said that cyclists were not a danger ;-)

>>
>> They really are quite fecund in wales.. I could have sworn the
>> population was only around 1.5 million females a couple of years ago
>> (and 1.4M males..).
>>

>
> Offa's Dyke cease to be an effective segregation from the United
> Kingdom` centuries ago although I know some locals still think
> otherwise ;-)


With the internet, the English Channel ceased to be an effective segregation
of the news media from the rest of the world, so why not 111 people out of 6
billion?

--
Ambrose
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> David Martin wrote:
> > Tony Raven wrote:
> >> davek wrote:
> >>> Douglas Steel wrote:
> >>>> 74 votes
> >>>> 111 votes
> >>> Well, that's conclusive then.
> >>>
> >> But no doubt someone will say only 111 people out of 60.4 million said
> >> that cyclists were not a danger ;-)

> >
> > They really are quite fecund in wales.. I could have sworn the
> > population was only around 1.5 million females a couple of years ago
> > (and 1.4M males..).
> >

>
> Offa's Dyke cease to be an effective segregation from the United
> Kingdom` centuries ago although I know some locals still think otherwise ;-)


Then why limit it geographically? (is there a term for the net
equivalent of geography?)

Surely there are at least 250M people able to vote on the site.

...d
 
Ambrose Nankivell wrote:
>
> With the internet, the English Channel ceased to be an effective
> segregation of the news media from the rest of the world, so why not 111
> people out of 6 billion?
>


Because you still need a passport to cross the Channel and because I
didn't want to make too outrageous a claim ;-)

--
Tony

"The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
right."
- Lord Hailsham
 
David Martin wrote:
> They really are quite fecund in wales.. I could have sworn the
> population was only around 1.5 million females a couple of years ago
> (and 1.4M males..).
>
> ..d


Don't forget the sheep ;)

Baaaaa!

PS: do they really drive 4x4's?
 
squeaker said:
David Martin wrote:
> They really are quite fecund in wales.. I could have sworn the
> population was only around 1.5 million females a couple of years ago
> (and 1.4M males..).
>
> ..d


Don't forget the sheep ;)

Baaaaa!

PS: do they really drive 4x4's?
Perhaps that's why we're so fecund!

I can't believe I just said that. I'll never get out alive.

p.s. Does who really drive 4x4s? Y defaid?
 
General Easterly wrote:
> Link (http://tinyurl.com/fybbc) to a piece from the opposite end of
> Wales to me. Yesterdays front page poll was "Are cyclists dangerous".
>
> Can we guess what the result was???
>

But keen cyclist Louise Jones, from Port Talbot, said she found Mr
Fincham's theory "a very strange sort of argument". Asked if she had
experienced hostility from motorists, she said, "It tends to be just
from youths in souped-up cars who think it's only them who are allowed
on the roads. ...."

Not in my experience. They're the ones with most to lose - money spent
on tarting up the car, licence if they get prosecuted, ruinous insurance
premiums.

I find it's the middle-aged-men-who-haven't-quite-made-it group that
look for an argument.
 
Al C-F wrote:
>
> I find it's the middle-aged-men-who-haven't-quite-made-it group that
> look for an argument.


I find it's the semi retired farts driving small buses to subsidise
their pension.

--
Don Whybrow

Sequi Bonum Non Time

"So tell me, just how long have you had this feeling that no one
is watching you?" (Christopher Locke: Entropy Gradient Reversals)
 
..

"Don Whybrow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Al C-F wrote:
>>
>> I find it's the middle-aged-men-who-haven't-quite-made-it group that look
>> for an argument.

>
> I find it's the semi retired farts driving small buses to subsidise their
> pension.

<snip><snip>

I'm a fully retired fart who has gone the other way a long time ago! I cycle
everywhere I can at 69 years old.

Don't be so bl**dy ageist and stupid!

--
Trevor A Panther
In South Yorkshire,
England, United Kingdom
 
Pinky wrote:
> .
>
> "Don Whybrow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Al C-F wrote:
>>
>>>I find it's the middle-aged-men-who-haven't-quite-made-it group that look
>>>for an argument.

>>
>>I find it's the semi retired farts driving small buses to subsidise their
>>pension.

>
> <snip><snip>
>
> I'm a fully retired fart who has gone the other way a long time ago! I cycle
> everywhere I can at 69 years old.
>
> Don't be so bl**dy ageist and stupid!


I have nothing against old farts, indeed my parents are older than you
and one day I hope to qualify as one.

My comment was made with one particular old fart in mind. My regular
commute is along roads with a green bus/cycle/taxi lane and a lane where
the rest of the traffic go. Occasionally the green lane stops and an
optional cycle lane appears. Usually at places like junctions. Not so
long ago, I was passed extremely closely by a small bus driven by the
old fart in question. Now, I am used to this, What I was not used to was
that as he passed, he blew his horn and waved his fist at me. When I
caught him at the next set of lights, I had the opportunity to discuss
the matter with him. His reason, I had strayed out of the marked cycle
lane which he insisted were compulsory for cyclists to stay in. He then
asked if I knew who he was, as if that would excuse him, and claimed he
knew all about cycle lanes as we would not have them if it had not been
for him.

As a middle-aged-man-who-hasn't-quite-made-it I have observed that
ageism can strike at all levels, it even affects those that complain
about it the most.

p.s. Autosig appears to be on the spot.

--
Don Whybrow

Sequi Bonum Non Time

If you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop
diggin'.
 
in message <[email protected]>, Tony Raven
('[email protected]') wrote:

> Ambrose Nankivell wrote:
>>
>> With the internet, the English Channel ceased to be an effective
>> segregation of the news media from the rest of the world, so why not
>> 111 people out of 6 billion?

>
> Because you still need a passport to cross the Channel


You don't need a passport to vote on a website, however.

--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

There are no messages. The above is just a random stream of
bytes. Any opinion or meaning you find in it is your own creation.
 

Similar threads