B
Benjamin Weiner
Guest
Phil Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't follow your argument here - but in any case, I find it telling that according to you,
> > circumferential velocity is regularly used by physicists, even though you dispute its
> > correctness.
> Just as they regularly and incorrectly flip flop speed and velocity. Just because they do so
> doesn't mean it's correct. Velocity being a vector, requires a frame of reference with a
> coordinate system and there is no system defined that would explain circumferential velocity in
> the way you intended (constant speed).
I never hear anyone say "circumferential velocity," but in my line of work people use polar
coordinates and talk about tangential (and radial) velocity all the time. Cartesian coordinates are
a pain in the ass if you are dealing with round things. A centripetal acceleration is usually
implied. One could argue that an object moving in a circle doesn't have a constant tangential
velocity, but everyone knows what it means. Besides, we also want to talk about velocity dispersion
in the tangential direction, and calling that "tangential speed dispersion" would be somewhere
between awkward and wrong.
Bike racing content: uh ... any errors are because I'm tired from riding today.
> > I don't follow your argument here - but in any case, I find it telling that according to you,
> > circumferential velocity is regularly used by physicists, even though you dispute its
> > correctness.
> Just as they regularly and incorrectly flip flop speed and velocity. Just because they do so
> doesn't mean it's correct. Velocity being a vector, requires a frame of reference with a
> coordinate system and there is no system defined that would explain circumferential velocity in
> the way you intended (constant speed).
I never hear anyone say "circumferential velocity," but in my line of work people use polar
coordinates and talk about tangential (and radial) velocity all the time. Cartesian coordinates are
a pain in the ass if you are dealing with round things. A centripetal acceleration is usually
implied. One could argue that an object moving in a circle doesn't have a constant tangential
velocity, but everyone knows what it means. Besides, we also want to talk about velocity dispersion
in the tangential direction, and calling that "tangential speed dispersion" would be somewhere
between awkward and wrong.
Bike racing content: uh ... any errors are because I'm tired from riding today.