why pros do not use the Orca

Discussion in 'Cycling Equipment' started by peloquma, Mar 15, 2005.

  1. peloquma

    peloquma New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm in the market for a new bike, I've finalised my choice on Look or a BMC, or a Orbea Orca. I must say the Orca is tempting for many reasons including fiscal ones.

    My question to you folks is why on earth does the euskaltel unit on the pro tour still use a good old ALU only frame when they could spin with an Orca ? Especially in the mountain where the Orca excels ?
     
    Tags:


  2. Author

    Author New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Aluminum is much cheaper that might be one of the reasons.
     
  3. peloquma

    peloquma New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    We are talking about the Tour de France here... Iban Mayo man...
     
  4. boudreaux

    boudreaux New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    0
    Where do you get that? Maybe the aluminum is lighter and stiffer.
     
  5. peloquma

    peloquma New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe, and maybe it really sucks going downhill on alu too... I just find it odd, every reviews have specifically mentionned the Orca's climbing strength, Jelly Belly uses the Orca. After research it looks like different bikes are used. The euskaltel columbus-carbon for Mayo's climb, the carbon for flats and a TT version. I'm just worried it's gonna flex like hell then I'm also told the BMC is a bit on the stiff side (as far as comfort)... Looks like they all have their choices, for my size I am guessing it won't be an issue, it was noted however that the 2005 model Orca's changes were made to make the bb stiffer. Where I live, we do not have the luxury (or do I have the time) to test ride.

    I guess I just answered myself.
     
  6. artmichalek

    artmichalek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,010
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some of the reason is custom geometry. Mayo's climbing bike in particular has the rear wheel moved forward along with some other changes from the stock geometry. Getting a mold made up for a custom carbon frame is both cost and more importantly time prohibitive.
     
  7. Powerful Pete

    Powerful Pete New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,866
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read somewhere (no, I do not remember where :confused: ) that the Orca, while light, was considered to be veerry flexy. Take it with a grain of salt, but that might be part of the reason.
     
  8. ed073

    ed073 New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,528
    Likes Received:
    0

    Euskaltel riders can use any frame they like from Orbea. Obviously some prefer aluminium over carbon.
     
  9. waxbytes

    waxbytes New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    2
    Maybe not all pro's want to ride carbon frames?

    Or am I commiting sacrilege by suggesting that this year's
    wonder product may not suit everyone?:eek:
     
  10. peloquma

    peloquma New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    It all makes sense, I just saw Mayo's custom climbing machine on cycling news, that seat tube basicaly bends around the tire, it's quite something, one once over the limit.
     
  11. phillip-8727

    phillip-8727 New Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    heres a photo of euskatel with a complete aluminium frame
    -http://grahamwatson.com/gw/imagedocs.nsf/updateframesetcall?openform&05parniceSt4

    many of the euskatel riders would have spent some years on the aluminium models before the orca came out, i spose some just prefer the aluminium feel.

    i have read reviews on other full carbon bikes where the testers feel that it is too soft, one guy said he felt like he was riding on partially inflated tyres. i spose it an individuals choice, but id say test riding both the orca and the top of the line alumium/carbon orbea model would be a wise move.
     
  12. patch70

    patch70 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,682
    Likes Received:
    0
    A lot of it is to do with cost and custom frames.

    When a sponsor has to provide ~4 standard road frames to each rider per year, their preference is to provide Al bikes. They are cheaper yes but some racers also like the stiffness and lightness.

    As stated above, custom sizing for carbon bikes is more difficult - esp when looking at monocoque frames. This would certainly be prohibitive.

    Look at many of the brands that make both top-end Al & Carbon bikes. Their sponsored teams often are still on the Al option or have only recently changed to Carbon (eg De Rosa, Bianchi, LaPierre, Orbea, Cervelo, Merckx).
     
Loading...