"Roger Hunter" <
[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> "Tom Henderson" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>
news:[email protected]...
>
>> Roger, that wasn't his point, it was yours. Unless of course you're the same person, which I've
>> occasionally suspected.
>
> Sorry to disappoint, but I don't have the time to be 'ecce' and me. However, he's turned into a
> fine troll. When I knew him on the 220 forum he had your position. He hated trolls and spent most
> of his time defending triathlon and triathletes. Funny how time changes folk.
>
>
Even as a troll, he's far from fine. Ever met Brian W?
>> I have met triathletes who fit your description of shallow self absorbed people who were only
>> concerned with self image. The were in the vast minority.
>
> Point of English. A minority can't be 'vast'. It *can* be 'significant'. Perhaps this was what
> you meant?
>
>
Does the fact that you found something else to nitpick imply agreement with the point made?
>> And none have ever sounded as holier-than-though and self absorbed as you have when you've talked
>> about how tough it's been to be a "serious" triathlete saddled with their presence.
>
> I know. I'm an arrogant pain-in-the-ass.
>
>
I didn't say that. I was trying to point out that you occasionally look a lotlike what
you're mocking.
>> This is your own private trolling method. Insult the group and wait for a response. Fortunately,
>> you've also had some serious and useful input at times.
>
> I'm not complaining. It's been nice to see a few bright souls on rst.
>
>
They're all over the place. Of course, what you see is heavily influenced by what you're
looking for.
> Roger.
>