I
invalid
Guest
"Mars1" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Why White Aryans should vote 4 JF Kerry
>
> Well, my White brothers and sisters, in a few short weeks you will be
> encouraged, prodded, intimidated and coerced to "go to the polls" and
> "exercise your right to vote!" The Corporate anti-White media machine
> will continue this useless mantra with ever increasing mindless blather
> about "how important this is to our democracy". Every vote counts, blah,
> blah, blah, ad noseum.
>
> But what does it really mean to the White-power movement and White
> people in general? Well, nothing. There is no one running who is or
> wants to look out for the interests of our race, other than perhaps the
> Populist Party and the occasional "open racist" like the fellow running
> for Congress down in Tennessee (his name escapes at the moment, and he
> is not from my district, but I wish I could vote for him).
>
> So what does voting actually mean, for the very most part? Well, our
> entire political system has been hijacked by big anti-White Corporate
> interests who have little interest in anything other than keeping
> themselves wealthy and in power. They aim to take over the world,
> essentially, while appearing *NOT* to have done such. If you look at
> history, you will see that many wars were fought for Corporate
> interests---fighting over spices, silk, exotic foodstuffs and the like.
> Sure, wars have been fought over other things---the "King's ego",
> disputed territory, perceived "insults", distracting the populace from
> internal problems and other "ostensible reasons", but much of war has to
> do with promoting the interests of big business, big banks, and the
> aristocracy. The same basic thing has happened to our domestic policy.
> The "string-pulling" aristocracy has made it quite clear that it wants
> the country "diverse", as if that were a good thing (it isn't). But,
> having multiculturalism keeps one group from dominating other groups.
>
> Another big quest of the aristocracy is to take over political systems,
> which has in effect already happened over the last several decades.
> Think about it: if you are interested in taking over a country you do
> *NOT* eliminate voting. Let the public lemmings *THINK* they are
> powerful in that they have "some control" over who is elected. It makes
> them happy and relatively contented, though it is a waste of time to the
> average White person.
>
> But if the aristocracy decides *WHO* runs, *WHO* gets financed, *WHO*
> gets good press coverage, *WHO* gets into the national televised debates
> then in effect the aristocracy *HAS* taken over, kidnapped, and co-opted
> the "democratic process". And that, in effect, is what has occurred in
> America.
>
> So, what will you do the November @ voting time? Many White-power types
> will suggest voting Republican. After all, ****ers vote 90% for the
> Democrats. While this might seem a good idea, it really is *NOT*.
> Republican George W. Bush has made it clear that he wants to legalise
> all illegal immigrants. How is this good for White people? He supports
> his brother's marriage to a Mexican woman. He also speaks Spanish to
> suck up to the Hispanics. While I am not generally anti-Hispanic I
> relise that too many non-whites flooding the country is not a good thing
> for the White race.
>
> We could try a "contrarian approach" and vote for Democrats, hoping
> things will get worse (the "worse is better" approach) and this really
> really does makes sense. Bush is already starting to hand *EVERYTHING*
> to the ****ers and gooks.
>
> So in conclusion I urge you to hold your nose and vote for Kerry. While
> the Democrats have been the "black party" since about the 1960's we
> should really not hesitate to support them. Kerry will appoint judges to
> the Supreme Court who will vote to unhold abortion rights and it is in
> our interests to have ****er abortion rights confirmed.
>
> Of course, if Bush is re-elected he will ****-up and appoint "stealth
> Jew-rists" to the "high court" anyway. That's the way CON-servatives
> are. If you don't believe me then go check your history books.
> CON-servatve Dwight Eisenhauer appointed Justice William Brennan to the
> court and appointed Earl Warren as Chief Justice. Both were super
> pro-****er. Some people actually blame Brennan for destroying democracy
> by "judiical activism" (a charge I largely agree with). Richard Nixon,
> another CON-servative appointed Harry Blackmun, another pro-****er as
> well as current Chief Justice Rehnquist. Some will say; "Oh, Rehnquist
> is on *OUR* side!" Really? Do you remember that it was the Rehnquist
> court that refused to hear the Matt Hale lawsuit against the Illinois
> Bar for denying him a law license? Rehnquist is *NOT* our friend! And
> how about CON-servative Gerald Ford, who appointed John Paul Stevens to
> the Supreme Court? Stevens is another pro-****er Jew-rist from Ohio and
> was a big proponent of forced busing to ran integration down our
> throats. And "old man" George Bush, Sr. appointed Justice David Souter,
> a goofball from the Northeast who votes pro-****er interests.
>
> So, there you have it.
>
> If you feel you *MUST* vote to fulfill your "civic duty" then vote
> Kerry. No, he probably won't win but that's not the real issue since
> "our side" cannot currently win anyways.
>
> **** the voting system. It doesn't work for pro-White intersts.
>
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
>
>
>
>
news:[email protected]...
>
> Why White Aryans should vote 4 JF Kerry
>
> Well, my White brothers and sisters, in a few short weeks you will be
> encouraged, prodded, intimidated and coerced to "go to the polls" and
> "exercise your right to vote!" The Corporate anti-White media machine
> will continue this useless mantra with ever increasing mindless blather
> about "how important this is to our democracy". Every vote counts, blah,
> blah, blah, ad noseum.
>
> But what does it really mean to the White-power movement and White
> people in general? Well, nothing. There is no one running who is or
> wants to look out for the interests of our race, other than perhaps the
> Populist Party and the occasional "open racist" like the fellow running
> for Congress down in Tennessee (his name escapes at the moment, and he
> is not from my district, but I wish I could vote for him).
>
> So what does voting actually mean, for the very most part? Well, our
> entire political system has been hijacked by big anti-White Corporate
> interests who have little interest in anything other than keeping
> themselves wealthy and in power. They aim to take over the world,
> essentially, while appearing *NOT* to have done such. If you look at
> history, you will see that many wars were fought for Corporate
> interests---fighting over spices, silk, exotic foodstuffs and the like.
> Sure, wars have been fought over other things---the "King's ego",
> disputed territory, perceived "insults", distracting the populace from
> internal problems and other "ostensible reasons", but much of war has to
> do with promoting the interests of big business, big banks, and the
> aristocracy. The same basic thing has happened to our domestic policy.
> The "string-pulling" aristocracy has made it quite clear that it wants
> the country "diverse", as if that were a good thing (it isn't). But,
> having multiculturalism keeps one group from dominating other groups.
>
> Another big quest of the aristocracy is to take over political systems,
> which has in effect already happened over the last several decades.
> Think about it: if you are interested in taking over a country you do
> *NOT* eliminate voting. Let the public lemmings *THINK* they are
> powerful in that they have "some control" over who is elected. It makes
> them happy and relatively contented, though it is a waste of time to the
> average White person.
>
> But if the aristocracy decides *WHO* runs, *WHO* gets financed, *WHO*
> gets good press coverage, *WHO* gets into the national televised debates
> then in effect the aristocracy *HAS* taken over, kidnapped, and co-opted
> the "democratic process". And that, in effect, is what has occurred in
> America.
>
> So, what will you do the November @ voting time? Many White-power types
> will suggest voting Republican. After all, ****ers vote 90% for the
> Democrats. While this might seem a good idea, it really is *NOT*.
> Republican George W. Bush has made it clear that he wants to legalise
> all illegal immigrants. How is this good for White people? He supports
> his brother's marriage to a Mexican woman. He also speaks Spanish to
> suck up to the Hispanics. While I am not generally anti-Hispanic I
> relise that too many non-whites flooding the country is not a good thing
> for the White race.
>
> We could try a "contrarian approach" and vote for Democrats, hoping
> things will get worse (the "worse is better" approach) and this really
> really does makes sense. Bush is already starting to hand *EVERYTHING*
> to the ****ers and gooks.
>
> So in conclusion I urge you to hold your nose and vote for Kerry. While
> the Democrats have been the "black party" since about the 1960's we
> should really not hesitate to support them. Kerry will appoint judges to
> the Supreme Court who will vote to unhold abortion rights and it is in
> our interests to have ****er abortion rights confirmed.
>
> Of course, if Bush is re-elected he will ****-up and appoint "stealth
> Jew-rists" to the "high court" anyway. That's the way CON-servatives
> are. If you don't believe me then go check your history books.
> CON-servatve Dwight Eisenhauer appointed Justice William Brennan to the
> court and appointed Earl Warren as Chief Justice. Both were super
> pro-****er. Some people actually blame Brennan for destroying democracy
> by "judiical activism" (a charge I largely agree with). Richard Nixon,
> another CON-servative appointed Harry Blackmun, another pro-****er as
> well as current Chief Justice Rehnquist. Some will say; "Oh, Rehnquist
> is on *OUR* side!" Really? Do you remember that it was the Rehnquist
> court that refused to hear the Matt Hale lawsuit against the Illinois
> Bar for denying him a law license? Rehnquist is *NOT* our friend! And
> how about CON-servative Gerald Ford, who appointed John Paul Stevens to
> the Supreme Court? Stevens is another pro-****er Jew-rist from Ohio and
> was a big proponent of forced busing to ran integration down our
> throats. And "old man" George Bush, Sr. appointed Justice David Souter,
> a goofball from the Northeast who votes pro-****er interests.
>
> So, there you have it.
>
> If you feel you *MUST* vote to fulfill your "civic duty" then vote
> Kerry. No, he probably won't win but that's not the real issue since
> "our side" cannot currently win anyways.
>
> **** the voting system. It doesn't work for pro-White intersts.
>
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
>
>
>
>