Will Lances kids be great cyclists one day?



S

swamprun

Guest
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:

> If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
>
> Zoom


http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm

Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.
 
S

swamprun

Guest
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:

> If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
>
> Zoom


http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm

Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.
 
G

gwhite

Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>
> Regression to the mean.
>


Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
 
G

gwhite

Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>
> Regression to the mean.
>


Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
 
G

gwhite

Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>
> Regression to the mean.
>


Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
 
G

gwhite

Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>
> Regression to the mean.
>


Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
 
G

gwhite

Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>
> Regression to the mean.
>


Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
 
G

gwhite

Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>
> Regression to the mean.
>


Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
 
G

gwhite

Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>
> Regression to the mean.
>


Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
 
S

Steve Freides

Guest
"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>

>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?


Bond, James Bond.

-S-
 
S

Steve Freides

Guest
"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>

>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?


Bond, James Bond.

-S-
 
S

Steve Freides

Guest
"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>

>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?


Bond, James Bond.

-S-
 
S

Steve Freides

Guest
"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>

>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?


Bond, James Bond.

-S-
 
S

Steve Freides

Guest
"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>

>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?


Bond, James Bond.

-S-
 
S

Steve Freides

Guest
"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>

>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?


Bond, James Bond.

-S-
 
S

Steve Freides

Guest
"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?

>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>

>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?


Bond, James Bond.

-S-
 
S

Steven Bornfeld

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-


Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>



--
Cut the nonsense to reply
 
S

Steven Bornfeld

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-


Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>



--
Cut the nonsense to reply
 
S

Steven Bornfeld

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-


Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>



--
Cut the nonsense to reply
 
S

Steven Bornfeld

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-


Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>



--
Cut the nonsense to reply