Will Lances kids be great cyclists one day?



S

Steven Bornfeld

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-


Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>



--
Cut the nonsense to reply
 
S

Steven Bornfeld

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-


Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>



--
Cut the nonsense to reply
 
S

Steven Bornfeld

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-


Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>



--
Cut the nonsense to reply
 
G

gwhite

Guest
swamprun wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:
>
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
> >
> >
> > Zoom

>
> http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm
>
> Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.



So...

1. Lance got "it" from mom, not dad.

2. Lance chose a mom-look-alike mate.

Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
but moms.

Don't check mom at the door.
 
G

gwhite

Guest
swamprun wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:
>
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
> >
> >
> > Zoom

>
> http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm
>
> Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.



So...

1. Lance got "it" from mom, not dad.

2. Lance chose a mom-look-alike mate.

Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
but moms.

Don't check mom at the door.
 
G

gwhite

Guest
swamprun wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:
>
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
> >
> >
> > Zoom

>
> http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm
>
> Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.



So...

1. Lance got "it" from mom, not dad.

2. Lance chose a mom-look-alike mate.

Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
but moms.

Don't check mom at the door.
 
G

gwhite

Guest
swamprun wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:
>
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
> >
> >
> > Zoom

>
> http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm
>
> Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.



So...

1. Lance got "it" from mom, not dad.

2. Lance chose a mom-look-alike mate.

Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
but moms.

Don't check mom at the door.
 
G

gwhite

Guest
swamprun wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:
>
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
> >
> >
> > Zoom

>
> http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm
>
> Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.



So...

1. Lance got "it" from mom, not dad.

2. Lance chose a mom-look-alike mate.

Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
but moms.

Don't check mom at the door.
 
G

gwhite

Guest
swamprun wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:
>
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
> >
> >
> > Zoom

>
> http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm
>
> Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.



So...

1. Lance got "it" from mom, not dad.

2. Lance chose a mom-look-alike mate.

Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
but moms.

Don't check mom at the door.
 
G

gwhite

Guest
swamprun wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:
>
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
> >
> >
> > Zoom

>
> http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm
>
> Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.



So...

1. Lance got "it" from mom, not dad.

2. Lance chose a mom-look-alike mate.

Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
but moms.

Don't check mom at the door.
 
T

Tim Lines

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>


I am shocked and dismayed to learn that "Q" was passing steroids. He
seemed like such a _nice_ old man, you know?
 
T

Tim Lines

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>


I am shocked and dismayed to learn that "Q" was passing steroids. He
seemed like such a _nice_ old man, you know?
 
T

Tim Lines

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>


I am shocked and dismayed to learn that "Q" was passing steroids. He
seemed like such a _nice_ old man, you know?
 
T

Tim Lines

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>


I am shocked and dismayed to learn that "Q" was passing steroids. He
seemed like such a _nice_ old man, you know?
 
T

Tim Lines

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>


I am shocked and dismayed to learn that "Q" was passing steroids. He
seemed like such a _nice_ old man, you know?
 
T

Tim Lines

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>


I am shocked and dismayed to learn that "Q" was passing steroids. He
seemed like such a _nice_ old man, you know?
 
T

Tim Lines

Guest
Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>

>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>


I am shocked and dismayed to learn that "Q" was passing steroids. He
seemed like such a _nice_ old man, you know?
 
M

Mad Dog

Guest
gwhite says...

>Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
>but moms.


Some believe that Lance got a chip on his shoulder from his parent's breakup and
that has been the fire that fueled the hate which has driven his racing
successes. If that's the case, his kids have plenty of fodder to fuel their
future.

But I'll bet $50 none of Lance's kids even make it to the Tour.
 
M

Mad Dog

Guest
gwhite says...

>Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
>but moms.


Some believe that Lance got a chip on his shoulder from his parent's breakup and
that has been the fire that fueled the hate which has driven his racing
successes. If that's the case, his kids have plenty of fodder to fuel their
future.

But I'll bet $50 none of Lance's kids even make it to the Tour.
 
M

Mad Dog

Guest
gwhite says...

>Ergo, Lance's kids will be great cyclists, but not because of his genes,
>but moms.


Some believe that Lance got a chip on his shoulder from his parent's breakup and
that has been the fire that fueled the hate which has driven his racing
successes. If that's the case, his kids have plenty of fodder to fuel their
future.

But I'll bet $50 none of Lance's kids even make it to the Tour.