I have the 720i and say it works flawlessly, both speed and
cadence, both wireless. Just pulled down the race bike from
the rafters and all functions work as they should. I did
have to replace the cadence sensor battery shortly after I
purchased it, but since then it has been great. Although if
it wasn't great I would send tt back to them, because it's
to much money not to work right. It's on a Cervelo P2K.
CerveloRod
ChronoFish wrote:
> "Steve Holdoway" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>
news:[email protected]...
>
>>On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:05:11 +0100, "DrClean"
>><
[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"M Kochanski" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>
news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>>I'm looking for a wireless with cadence. Anyone with
>>>>positive or negative experiences with wireless bicycle
>>>>computers with cadence is appreciated - basically
>>>>looking for models to avoid or models worth trying out.
>>>>
>>>>Mark
>>>
>>>Hi mark,
>>>
>>>I was looking for one too but couldn't get a wireless
>>>one with cadence. The Bike Shop in Harrow suggested that
>>>the distance is too great between the handle bars and
>>>the crank. In the end I got a Cateye Astrale, which
>>>works great.
>>
>>My Polar 510 has this option, but I never really got the
>>cadence to work properly. Mind you, it was fitted to a
>>softride, and it's not too easy to find anywhere to put
>>the cadence sensor in the first place!
>>
>>Steve
>
>
>
> I'm glad you brought up the 510. I have a "wired"
> Performance Axiom(cheap, but has lasted several years)with
> cadence, and I just last year got the s510. I've not had
> 100% success with it as a cyclo-computer. It's
> intermittent - and when it does work for a full ride tends
> to be off on its speed. (I don't know if the wired system
> is interfering...)
>
> I've thought about getting the cadence sensor, but I
> haven't yet decided that I need to spend $40 just so that
> I can have another graph to analyze.
>
> -CF