Wires strung between trees

[Richard]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nottinghamshire/4597616.stm

Bikers warned of tree wire danger
Police are warning anyone who uses a stretch of woodland of wires tied
deliberately tied between trees.

One cyclist was injured slightly when riding his bike in Ransom Wood off
the Rainworth bypass in Nottinghamshire.

Officers are also concerned that if a motorcyclist hit the wire they
could be seriously, if not fatally, injured.

Pc John Albanese said: "If they hit the wire at anything faster than
10mph they would be seriously injured, perhaps even decapitated."

He added: "It could be the work of a prankster, but it is more likely a
crude attempt to stop illegal off-road bikers from using the path.

"It may seem a justified course of action to whoever did this, but their
method is very dangerous and could cost someone their life."

The 37-year-old cyclist was saved from severe injury by his helmet,
which took the force of the impact with the head-height wire.

 

[MartinM]

Richard wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nottinghamshire/4597616.stm
>
> Bikers warned of tree wire danger
> Police are warning anyone who uses a stretch of woodland of wires tied
> deliberately tied between trees.
>
> One cyclist was injured slightly when riding his bike in Ransom Wood off
> the Rainworth bypass in Nottinghamshire.
>
> Officers are also concerned that if a motorcyclist hit the wire they
> could be seriously, if not fatally, injured.
>
> Pc John Albanese said: "If they hit the wire at anything faster than
> 10mph they would be seriously injured, perhaps even decapitated."
>
> He added: "It could be the work of a prankster, but it is more likely a
> crude attempt to stop illegal off-road bikers from using the path.
>
> "It may seem a justified course of action to whoever did this, but their
> method is very dangerous and could cost someone their life."
>
> The 37-year-old cyclist was saved from severe injury by his helmet,
> which took the force of the impact with the head-height wire.

this has happened before (wasn't it Danny Colyer?). Since when do pedal
cycles only go less than 10mph?

 

[elyob]

"Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nottinghamshire/4597616.stm
>
> Bikers warned of tree wire danger
> Police are warning anyone who uses a stretch of woodland of wires tied
> deliberately tied between trees.
>
> One cyclist was injured slightly when riding his bike in Ransom Wood off
> the Rainworth bypass in Nottinghamshire.
>
> Officers are also concerned that if a motorcyclist hit the wire they could
> be seriously, if not fatally, injured.
>
> Pc John Albanese said: "If they hit the wire at anything faster than 10mph
> they would be seriously injured, perhaps even decapitated."
>
> He added: "It could be the work of a prankster, but it is more likely a
> crude attempt to stop illegal off-road bikers from using the path.
>
> "It may seem a justified course of action to whoever did this, but their
> method is very dangerous and could cost someone their life."
>
> The 37-year-old cyclist was saved from severe injury by his helmet, which
> took the force of the impact with the head-height wire.

Is this "multi-post" week?

 

[Richard]

elyob wrote:

> Is this "multi-post" week?

What are you babbling about?

R.

 

[elyob]

"Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> elyob wrote:
>
>> Is this "multi-post" week?
>
> What are you babbling about?

I'm "babbling" about the fact that you were too lazy to check whether
someone had already posted about this.

 

[David Hansen]

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:01:13 +0000 someone who may be Richard
<[email protected]> wrote
this:-

>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nottinghamshire/4597616.stm

>The 37-year-old cyclist was saved from severe injury by his helmet,
>which took the force of the impact with the head-height wire.

Assuming it was not a full face helmet, we can conclude that the
wire would have contacted his head at forehead level. Even over
10mph it would be most unlikely for him to be decapitated like that.

He might also have passed under the wire completely had he not been
wearing a helmet.

Note for those that like to twist posts. None of the above in any
way condones the activities of those who erected the wire.


--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

 

[Mike Causer]

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:58:59 +0000, elyob wrote:

> I'm "babbling" about the fact that you were too lazy to check whether
> someone had already posted about this.

Usenet (NNTP to be precise) is not an instantaneous transmission medium.
Depending on the connections to your provider it may take hours for
articles to show up. With things like Google groups it can be days. This
is why news items frequently get multiple mentions.


Mike

 

[Ambrose Nankivell]

elyob wrote:

> Is this "multi-post" week?

It seems MattB posted the other report, so I imagine quite a few people
might not have read it.

--
Ambrose

 

[SW]

David Hansen wrote:
>
> He might also have passed under the wire completely had he not been
> wearing a helmet.
>

.... or the wire could have caught under the rim of the helmet causing
his neck to snap back sharply...

 

[Richard]

Ambrose Nankivell wrote:
> elyob wrote:
>
>> Is this "multi-post" week?
>
>
> It seems MattB posted the other report, so I imagine quite a few people
> might not have read it.

Indeed. TrollB is in my killfile. As, now, is elyob.

R.

 

[Ambrose Nankivell]

elyob wrote:
> "Richard"
> <[email protected]> wrote

Things both needing the taking of a chill pill.

Cool it, lads.

--
Ambrose

 

[Richard]

Ambrose Nankivell wrote:
> elyob wrote:
>
>> "Richard"
>> <[email protected]> wrote
>
>
> Things both needing the taking of a chill pill.
>
> Cool it, lads.

My apologies to elyob and all, my reaction was uncalled-for.

R.

 

[elyob2]

"Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Ambrose Nankivell wrote:
>> elyob wrote:
>>
>>> Is this "multi-post" week?
>>
>>
>> It seems MattB posted the other report, so I imagine quite a few people
>> might not have read it.
>
> Indeed. TrollB is in my killfile. As, now, is elyob.
>

Good

 

[elyob]

"Richard" <[email protected]>
wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Ambrose Nankivell wrote:
>> elyob wrote:
>>
>>> "Richard"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote
>>
>>
>> Things both needing the taking of a chill pill.
>>
>> Cool it, lads.
>
> My apologies to elyob and all, my reaction was uncalled-for.
>

Sorry to wind you up.

 

[[email protected]]

If only the Police would treat this for what it is, attempted murder.

 

[Paul - xxx]

SW came up with the following;:
> David Hansen wrote:
>>
>> He might also have passed under the wire completely had he not been
>> wearing a helmet.
>>
>
> ... or the wire could have caught under the rim of the helmet causing
> his neck to snap back sharply...

or simply sawed through/broken off the polystyrene with little effect on the
rider ...

--
Paul ...
(8(|) Homer Rules ..... Doh !!!
ebay 5852306602

 

[Tony Raven]

David Hansen wrote:

>
> Assuming it was not a full face helmet, we can conclude that the
> wire would have contacted his head at forehead level. Even over
> 10mph it would be most unlikely for him to be decapitated like that.
>

If it was a full face helmet, unless it was fitted with a visor it would
still have hit his face or slid off the chin bar onto his neck. and it
is easier to sever a helmet than a head or neck.


--
Tony

"The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
right."
- Lord Hailsham

 

[Bob Watkinson]

"elyob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Richard" <[email protected]>
> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> Ambrose Nankivell wrote:
>>> elyob wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Richard"
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote
>>>
>>>
>>> Things both needing the taking of a chill pill.
>>>
>>> Cool it, lads.
>>
>> My apologies to elyob and all, my reaction was uncalled-for.
>>
>
> Sorry to wind you up.
>

steady on guys. an unpleasant argument ending amicably. Most unusual for
Usenet

 

[naked_draughtsman]

MartinM wrote:
> Since when do pedal cycles only go less than 10mph?

<sarcasm>
When you fall into the group of 'typical cyclist' for which cycle
tracks are designed.

Such cyclists often ride bikes only a foot wide and don't mind sharing
their facilities with pedestrians, parked cars and anti-cycling
barriers.
</sarcasm>

Glad the police actually see this as a problem. At Colwyn Bay nobody
is interested in fishermen casting out off the promenade into the paths
of oncoming cyclists.

peter

 

[Tony Raven]

elyob wrote:

>> My apologies to elyob and all, my reaction was uncalled-for.
>>
>
> Sorry to wind you up.
>

"No, after you!" ;-)


--
Tony

"The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
right."
- Lord Hailsham