Woo Hoo, new bike toys



CowPunk wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>>Modern chains do not stretch. The hardened chain pin wears into the
>>bushing, or in the case of bushingless chains the pin wears into the
>>side plate.

>
>
> I have 2 chains in front of me right now, one new and one old, same
> number of links and yet mysteriously the old one is longer than the new
> one. What's your explanation?
>
>
>>As the chain elongates it wears higher onto the thinner portions of the
>>working face of the gear tooth.

>
>
> But you just said the chain doesn't stretch? which is it?
>
>
>>The cogs on the cassette turn more revolutions and wear far quicker
>>than the chainrings.

>
>
> You're missing the point.
>


No, you're missing the point because you're either a complete moron or
you're one of those non-mtn biking trolls around here.

Greg

--
"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons
 
G.T. wrote:

<snip>

> Because you took that piece of mind from his brain that worried about
> chainrings. Give that piece back!
>
> Greg


Keyboard

R

Peace!
 
GeeDubb wrote:
> Gary (planning a ride in brown once again tomorrow)



Brown rides are better than no rides.

JD
 
CowPunk wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> >Modern chains do not stretch. The hardened chain pin wears into the
> >bushing, or in the case of bushingless chains the pin wears into the
> >side plate.

>
> I have 2 chains in front of me right now, one new and one old, same
> number of links and yet mysteriously the old one is longer than the new
> one. What's your explanation?


Pin to pin wear, as I explained it above.

>
> >As the chain elongates it wears higher onto the thinner portions of the
> >working face of the gear tooth.

>
> But you just said the chain doesn't stretch? which is it?


The chain elogates due to pin to pin wear. The metal is not stretching,
it is elongating because material is wearing away.

> >The cogs on the cassette turn more revolutions and wear far quicker
> >than the chainrings.

>
> You're missing the point.
>
> >You need to replace your chain more often. You should be able to go
> >through 2 or 3 cassettes, and many more chains before you need to
> >relace the chainrings.

>
> I'm sure the chain manufacturers love you dearly. In my case I have 6
> bikes.
> 6 x 3 = 18 chains/year 18 x $30 = $540/year just on chains....
> Anyway, you're still missing the point.


And the rest of your drivetrain components are cheaper than a thirty
dollar chain?

> >On the team that I currently work for, as well
> >as the teams that I have worked for in the last couple of decades, I
> >have never found it neccessary to relace the whole drivetrain when just
> >changing out the chain and cassette. Most of the chainrings that we
> >replace during the season are replaced because they are damaged from
> >contact with a root, a rock, another rider ...

>
> I'm guessing your talking about LBS teams?


Nope.

AVCT/Bridgestone ... Avocet/Kiwi ... MOA

> Thank God you're not working on my bikes.


Absolutely!

>
> > To have Cowpunk spit out unsubstantiated blather that one should
> > replace their cassette and chain when replacing their chainrings ....
> > without knowing what the conditiion of the drivetrain is (insert
> > childish remark here).

>
> There's nothing unsubstantiated about my remark. It comes from 30
> years of riding and racing both bicycles and motorcycles.


So everytime someone replaces their chainrings, for what ever reason,
they should also replace the rest of their drive train? Holly Sh!t
talk about being in the industry's pocket.

lets see If I can recall what retail looks like... XTR Cassette
~$160.00 and X9sl chain ~49.00
So everytime a rider dinks a ~$99.00 chainring you'd have us throw in
an extra $209.00 in parts .... good way to **** through the budget.

Replace parts as you feel is neccessary but to say that someone should
replace their chain and cassette just because they are changing out
their chainrings is just pure B.S.

> > There is no hard fast rule on drivetrain component replacement (other
> > than perhaps the 1 percent chain wear limit) it is really up to you
> > and perhaps your mechanic to decide.

>
> ROFL... "your mechanic". It's a chain/cogc/chainring for crying out
> loud.


Lots of people have mechanics work on there bikes.

> It's not like adjusting the valves on a Ferrari ....


I would suppose not.

> > This year I had one rider who insisted that the X9SL chains the team
> > was running were wearing the chainrings on his machine. His
> > expalination, the cutout side plates were removing aluminum like a
> > cheese grater. So even with new chain and cassette every couple of
> > races ... he wanted new chainrings as well. For his piece of mind I
> > switched his bike over to a non SL version. No reason to do it ... just
> > piece of mind. Suddenly his chainring wear appearently stopped ....
> > there is just no explaining the thought process.
> >

>
> Or, it could bethat he was right and you are just too arrogant to admit
> your mistake?


LOL so chains now engage the working face of the tooth at the side
plate? You're a very funny guy.

The only time the side plate and the chainring come in contact is
during shifting and in extreme cross chaining, and even then it is the
bottom edge of the side plate that is contacting the ring ... not the
cut-outs in the center of the side plate.

> If you were my team mechanic


You have a team mechanic? That explains the depth of your knowledge.

> and pulled some **** like that you'de be
> looking for a new job pretty fast.


**** like what?

Keeping an athlete happy, by replacing perfectly servicable parts, ....
oh the horror.

If it upsets you so much maybe you could call the USCF and get my
license pulled.

R
 
G.T. wrote:

> No, you're missing the point because you're either a complete moron or
> you're one of those non-mtn biking trolls around here.
>
> Greg


Anyone who's spent anytime in this group knows who the real trolls are.
Offering advice is not trolling.

As far as my advice? if you don't like it, that's fine by me, I could
care less.
Gentleman have the ability to agree to disagree.

The only thing you've ever offered are flaming insults and put downs.

yes, I remember when cyclist used to help each other and actually waved
and
say hello to passing riders.
I bet you're too good for that though? That's not Cool for guys like
you...

Guys like you and your buddies, with your little high school cliques
and bad
boy attitude, are killing the sport because no one wants to hang out
with a
bunch of pricks. Grow up.
 
"JD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> GeeDubb wrote:
>> Gary (planning a ride in brown once again tomorrow)

>
>
> Brown rides are better than no rides.
>
> JD
>


yup, especially since the hum a dity was substantially lower today than it
has been. Did the Butte twice this week and did all the climbs on T100 this
morning so the quads are talking dirty to me. Now if I could get rid of
this low back pain thing I keep getting when riding. It just sucks all the
power out of me lately.

Gary
 
CowPunk wrote:
> G.T. wrote:
>
>
>>No, you're missing the point because you're either a complete moron or
>>you're one of those non-mtn biking trolls around here.
>>
>>Greg

>
>
> Anyone who's spent anytime in this group knows who the real trolls are.
> Offering advice is not trolling.
>
> As far as my advice? if you don't like it, that's fine by me, I could
> care less.


Crappy advice is far worse than the trolls. No one would take advice
from a troll but some may take your advice and waste their money, or
worse. Thankfully I know you're an idiot so I won't be taking any of
your advice. Of the people on the newsgroup that I haven't met
reco_diver is one of the few who I would take advice from.

Greg

--
"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons
 
"GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Carla A-G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Now to save up for a new rear shock......
>>>
>>> Gary (slow news day)

>>
>> What do you currently have?
>>
>> - CA-G
>>
>> Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
>>
>>

> Fox Float LR if I remember correctly. Boing's too much even at high
> pressure so I'm looking at a stable platform type of shock.
>

Getting it PUSHed is cheaper than a new shock.

www.pushindustries.com

Glenn D.
 
"GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Carla A-G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Now to save up for a new rear shock......
>>>
>>> Gary (slow news day)

>>
>> What do you currently have?
>>
>> - CA-G
>>
>> Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
>>
>>

> Fox Float LR if I remember correctly. Boing's too much even at high
> pressure so I'm looking at a stable platform type of shock.
>

Getting it PUSHed is cheaper than a new shock.

www.pushindustries.com

Glenn D.
 
"GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Carla A-G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Now to save up for a new rear shock......
>>>
>>> Gary (slow news day)

>>
>> What do you currently have?
>>
>> - CA-G
>>
>> Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
>>
>>

> Fox Float LR if I remember correctly. Boing's too much even at high
> pressure so I'm looking at a stable platform type of shock.
>

Getting it PUSHed is cheaper than a new shock.

www.pushindustries.com

Glenn D.
 
"GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Carla A-G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Now to save up for a new rear shock......
>>>
>>> Gary (slow news day)

>>
>> What do you currently have?
>>
>> - CA-G
>>
>> Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
>>
>>

> Fox Float LR if I remember correctly. Boing's too much even at high
> pressure so I'm looking at a stable platform type of shock.
>

Getting it PUSHed is cheaper than a new shock.

www.pushindustries.com

Glenn D.
 
"GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Carla A-G" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "GeeDubb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Now to save up for a new rear shock......
>>>
>>> Gary (slow news day)

>>
>> What do you currently have?
>>
>> - CA-G
>>
>> Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
>>
>>

> Fox Float LR if I remember correctly. Boing's too much even at high
> pressure so I'm looking at a stable platform type of shock.
>

Getting it PUSHed is cheaper than a new shock.

www.pushindustries.com

Glenn D.
 
Glenn Dowdy wrote:
> "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Glenn Dowdy wrote:
>>
>>> Getting it PUSHed is cheaper than a new shock.
>>>
>>> www.pushindustries.com



>> OK, after five times, QUIT PUSHIN'!


> Sorry, news server error. I really only sent it once.


That's OK. I just bought a new wireless keyboard and mouse, and certain
keystrokes I've been doing /for years/ suddenly have me erasing **** and
closing windows.

Bill "not a big fan of change" S.