J
jim beam
Guest
Peter Cole wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
>> Peter Cole wrote:
>>> jim beam wrote:
>>>> Peter Cole wrote:
>>>>> jim beam wrote:
>>>>>> Peter Cole wrote:
>>>>>>> jim beam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> why don't /you/? but i forget, you don't contribute. maybe
>>>>>>>> that's a guilt thing since you're playing this game on your
>>>>>>>> employer's time, not your own.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's none of your business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it's a damned good indicator of your fundamental dishonesty though.
>>>>>
>>>>> That the best you got?
>>>>
>>>> there's more. but let's just focus on the facts.
>>>
>>> Then why introduce (ad hominem, no less) inventions?
>>
>> invention? you post on your employer's time. that's no invention.
>
> I'm sure if you think *real hard* you can come up with another
> explanation. Or maybe not.
you're unemployed? got competency issues?
> jim beam wrote:
>> Peter Cole wrote:
>>> jim beam wrote:
>>>> Peter Cole wrote:
>>>>> jim beam wrote:
>>>>>> Peter Cole wrote:
>>>>>>> jim beam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> why don't /you/? but i forget, you don't contribute. maybe
>>>>>>>> that's a guilt thing since you're playing this game on your
>>>>>>>> employer's time, not your own.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's none of your business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it's a damned good indicator of your fundamental dishonesty though.
>>>>>
>>>>> That the best you got?
>>>>
>>>> there's more. but let's just focus on the facts.
>>>
>>> Then why introduce (ad hominem, no less) inventions?
>>
>> invention? you post on your employer's time. that's no invention.
>
> I'm sure if you think *real hard* you can come up with another
> explanation. Or maybe not.
you're unemployed? got competency issues?