J
Just Zis Guy
Guest
I was raking over the old Research Report 30 stuff writing a followup
(my questions to the DfT remian unanswered). While I was verifying
the pre-existing pro-helmet stance of the authors (which was easy:
four of them are effectively joined at the hip and have a history of
pro-helmet publications) I came across this gem:
<url:http://www.imj.ie/news_detail.php?nNewsId=2518&nVolId=97>
Apparently a helmet law for children is right up there with not allowing children to operate farm
machinery in the indicators for a country which is serious about child safety.
How's that for a sense of perspective?
Guy
===
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://chapmancentral.demon.co.uk
(my questions to the DfT remian unanswered). While I was verifying
the pre-existing pro-helmet stance of the authors (which was easy:
four of them are effectively joined at the hip and have a history of
pro-helmet publications) I came across this gem:
<url:http://www.imj.ie/news_detail.php?nNewsId=2518&nVolId=97>
Apparently a helmet law for children is right up there with not allowing children to operate farm
machinery in the indicators for a country which is serious about child safety.
How's that for a sense of perspective?
Guy
===
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://chapmancentral.demon.co.uk