Buchco is attempting a global takeover, and has been since they defrauded their way into power.
PNAC = Adolescent world domination fantasy.
READ ABOUT IT HERE:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/publicationsreports.htm
Now, the PNAC report you want to start with is the one entitled "Rebuilding Americas Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century". Here is an excerpt which should be of particular interest. It appears on page 51, left column, paragraph two:
But most importantly, what luck! They got just such a catalyzing, catastrophic event on September 11, 2001, just months after returning to power! Now, couple that with what you can read here. . .
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
Here is a great site that will give you any details you want to know about the people at PNAC
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/pnac.htm
And to watch a video that explains PNAC in simple terms, click here
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/barrysays.wmv
for a Quicktime version of this video, click here
http://www.knife-party.net/flash/barry.html
"PNAC is not America. They are the radical, idealistic, terrorists who have hijacked it, and are well on their way to completely destroying it. Not in the empty rhetorical way that conservatives have been shreiking about "liberals are ruining America", I mean the actually systematic destruction of Americas image, military, economy, environment, constitution, educational system, workers rights, manufacturing industry, future, the list goes on and on. And it isn't conservatives who are responsible for this destruction. It's just this group of radicals within the conservative camp." SHIFTERX @ SPOCK'S
ALL OF THESE EVENTS ARE TIED TOGETHER. THE TRAIL OF BLOOD AND GORE LEADS DIRECTLY TO **** CHENEYBURTON AND THE INTERNATIONAL BANKING AND "INVESTMENT" COMMUNITY THAT PROFITS DIRECTLY BY THE MISERY OF OTHERS.
The United States has a three-part manifest for bringing smaller nations under its thrall. First, an "economic" approach is attempted. The nation is offered a ridiculously high, mega-interest loan that it can never, ever pay off. (Now you know why Paul Wolfowitz is heading the World Bank.) As a condition to the loan, the nation agrees to "privatize" all of its industries and eliminate social programs, thereby promptly disenfranchising and impoverishing a majority of its population. (Just take a look at Africa.)
Second if that doesn't work, then a coup is attempted, usually with the assistance of friendly locals. (Haiti/Aristide is the most recent example, but it hasn't worked yet with Venezuela/Chavez.)
Third if neither one nor two above works, then an all-out military invasion is staged.
"Confessions of an Economic Hit Man", John Perkins.
During the Eisenhower administration, the U.S. attempted to oust newly installed Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, who had destroyed and displaced the U.S. puppet Batista regime. Oh, how they hate Fidel.
Fidel rejected the "free (uhm I mean "rigged") market capitalism" and "free trade" policies of the U.S. He recognized how terrible they were for the vast majority of people. Fidel refused U.S. aid; refused a loan, which of course, set plan "B" into action. Obviously, the many attempts that have been made covertly to depose Fidel over the last 70 years have failed abysmally.
During Kennedy's administration, efforts were made to drum up American support for Option "C" -- an all-out invasion of Cuba. First, there were a series of strange hijackings of commercial airliners, by Cuban nationals who had escaped from Castro's Cuba. Yet now, for some inexplicable reason (never given of course) they were hijacking American airliners and demanding to be flown to Havana!
These hijackings failed to engender sufficient American support to justify war with Cuba. Though there was a contingency plan, which contemplated escalating these "terror" attacks.
You can find it in a document called "Operation Northwoods".
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
Fortunatley, the Kennedy administration never was crazy enough to go to the extremes advocated in the Northwoods document; Johnson and Nixon had Vietnam. But Chimpy? What did he have? Questionable legitimacy; a failed economy; 45 million uninsured for health care; 25% of the population of the Land of the Free IN PRISON; extreme unpopularity; no ideas; growing discontent and then....
VOILA! a catalyzing, catastrophic event
Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, et. al., ALL OF WHOM WERE INVOLVED (and behind) IN THE WOULD-BE IMPERIAL NIXON ADMINISTRATION (as well as Reagan and Bush I) had access to Operation Northwoods documents. You can see how it starts to come together, but you have to look at this thing as an operation that spans decades, not just the few years since they came to power.
THIS IS A PLAN OF DECADES COME TO FRUITION: TO CREATE A CORPORATE THEOCRACY WHERE A SERVANT CLASS PROVIDES LABOR TO THE FILTHY RICH IN EXCHANGE FOR ROOM, BOARD AND MINIMUM HEALTH CARE (got to keep the slaves alive)
Why hasn't it come to fruition yet? PNAC's plan for world domination isn't working out how they had planned because it was delayed by about 8 years. They were counting on a second term for Bush the elder. 9/11 likely would have taken place on September 11, 1993, 20 years to the day of Nixon's Chilean coup (see Plan "B" above) During this time of course, Bush Sr. was CIA director. The CIA is the agency that carries out these black ops on behalf of the U.S.
However, they did not count on H. Ross Perot. He split the conservative vote and thwarted the Bush Sr. second term. They made sure the vote wouldn't thwart them again . . . they have DieBold now. If Bush had been reelected, I doubt we would have the internet, at least in it's current form, and frankly the net is the biggest reason this group is having so much trouble. They control all the mainstream press (making an adjustment from another mistake, when they tried to establish an imperial presidency under Nixon), but the net let's people circumnavigate the newscasters and find out what's really going on in the world.
This delay forced them to reach too fast and too far to make up for lost time. It would have been much easier to connect Saddam's Iraq to 9/11 if it had happened on schedule, just 2 years removed from the Gulf War. That connection would have made it easier to build a stronger coalition to invade and secure Iraq.
Instead, they got arrogant, sloppy and desperate.
IN FACT, they have already planned the next 9/11 attack and who they intend to pin it on:
"The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President **** Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option."
READ MORE: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/22/164841/163
Now, before the next 9/11 happens (and you know it will) ask yourself: What would IRAN have to gain by staging a terrorist attack on U.S. SOIL?
Ergo, why does the Cheney administration already have plans to NUKE IRAN after the next terrorist attack? How can they possibly know there will be one (*choke*) and even assuming so, how can they possibly know it will have been IRAN that did it?
Does anyone besides me smell a rat?
GET A CLUE PEOPLE. 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. THEY PLAN TO DO IT AGAIN WITH THEIR POLLS IN THE TOILET; THE LAW CATCHING UP WITH THEM AT LONG LAST AND LITERALLY NOTHING TO LOSE
And when it happens, will you then understand?
PNAC = Adolescent world domination fantasy.
READ ABOUT IT HERE:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/publicationsreports.htm
Now, the PNAC report you want to start with is the one entitled "Rebuilding Americas Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century". Here is an excerpt which should be of particular interest. It appears on page 51, left column, paragraph two:
Actually, all of page 51 is of special interest. Especially the part about controlling space and cyberspace.
But most importantly, what luck! They got just such a catalyzing, catastrophic event on September 11, 2001, just months after returning to power! Now, couple that with what you can read here. . .
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
Here is a great site that will give you any details you want to know about the people at PNAC
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/pnac.htm
And to watch a video that explains PNAC in simple terms, click here
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/barrysays.wmv
for a Quicktime version of this video, click here
http://www.knife-party.net/flash/barry.html
"PNAC is not America. They are the radical, idealistic, terrorists who have hijacked it, and are well on their way to completely destroying it. Not in the empty rhetorical way that conservatives have been shreiking about "liberals are ruining America", I mean the actually systematic destruction of Americas image, military, economy, environment, constitution, educational system, workers rights, manufacturing industry, future, the list goes on and on. And it isn't conservatives who are responsible for this destruction. It's just this group of radicals within the conservative camp." SHIFTERX @ SPOCK'S
ALL OF THESE EVENTS ARE TIED TOGETHER. THE TRAIL OF BLOOD AND GORE LEADS DIRECTLY TO **** CHENEYBURTON AND THE INTERNATIONAL BANKING AND "INVESTMENT" COMMUNITY THAT PROFITS DIRECTLY BY THE MISERY OF OTHERS.
The United States has a three-part manifest for bringing smaller nations under its thrall. First, an "economic" approach is attempted. The nation is offered a ridiculously high, mega-interest loan that it can never, ever pay off. (Now you know why Paul Wolfowitz is heading the World Bank.) As a condition to the loan, the nation agrees to "privatize" all of its industries and eliminate social programs, thereby promptly disenfranchising and impoverishing a majority of its population. (Just take a look at Africa.)
Second if that doesn't work, then a coup is attempted, usually with the assistance of friendly locals. (Haiti/Aristide is the most recent example, but it hasn't worked yet with Venezuela/Chavez.)
Third if neither one nor two above works, then an all-out military invasion is staged.
"Confessions of an Economic Hit Man", John Perkins.
During the Eisenhower administration, the U.S. attempted to oust newly installed Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, who had destroyed and displaced the U.S. puppet Batista regime. Oh, how they hate Fidel.
Fidel rejected the "free (uhm I mean "rigged") market capitalism" and "free trade" policies of the U.S. He recognized how terrible they were for the vast majority of people. Fidel refused U.S. aid; refused a loan, which of course, set plan "B" into action. Obviously, the many attempts that have been made covertly to depose Fidel over the last 70 years have failed abysmally.
During Kennedy's administration, efforts were made to drum up American support for Option "C" -- an all-out invasion of Cuba. First, there were a series of strange hijackings of commercial airliners, by Cuban nationals who had escaped from Castro's Cuba. Yet now, for some inexplicable reason (never given of course) they were hijacking American airliners and demanding to be flown to Havana!
These hijackings failed to engender sufficient American support to justify war with Cuba. Though there was a contingency plan, which contemplated escalating these "terror" attacks.
You can find it in a document called "Operation Northwoods".
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
Fortunatley, the Kennedy administration never was crazy enough to go to the extremes advocated in the Northwoods document; Johnson and Nixon had Vietnam. But Chimpy? What did he have? Questionable legitimacy; a failed economy; 45 million uninsured for health care; 25% of the population of the Land of the Free IN PRISON; extreme unpopularity; no ideas; growing discontent and then....
VOILA! a catalyzing, catastrophic event
Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, et. al., ALL OF WHOM WERE INVOLVED (and behind) IN THE WOULD-BE IMPERIAL NIXON ADMINISTRATION (as well as Reagan and Bush I) had access to Operation Northwoods documents. You can see how it starts to come together, but you have to look at this thing as an operation that spans decades, not just the few years since they came to power.
THIS IS A PLAN OF DECADES COME TO FRUITION: TO CREATE A CORPORATE THEOCRACY WHERE A SERVANT CLASS PROVIDES LABOR TO THE FILTHY RICH IN EXCHANGE FOR ROOM, BOARD AND MINIMUM HEALTH CARE (got to keep the slaves alive)
Why hasn't it come to fruition yet? PNAC's plan for world domination isn't working out how they had planned because it was delayed by about 8 years. They were counting on a second term for Bush the elder. 9/11 likely would have taken place on September 11, 1993, 20 years to the day of Nixon's Chilean coup (see Plan "B" above) During this time of course, Bush Sr. was CIA director. The CIA is the agency that carries out these black ops on behalf of the U.S.
However, they did not count on H. Ross Perot. He split the conservative vote and thwarted the Bush Sr. second term. They made sure the vote wouldn't thwart them again . . . they have DieBold now. If Bush had been reelected, I doubt we would have the internet, at least in it's current form, and frankly the net is the biggest reason this group is having so much trouble. They control all the mainstream press (making an adjustment from another mistake, when they tried to establish an imperial presidency under Nixon), but the net let's people circumnavigate the newscasters and find out what's really going on in the world.
This delay forced them to reach too fast and too far to make up for lost time. It would have been much easier to connect Saddam's Iraq to 9/11 if it had happened on schedule, just 2 years removed from the Gulf War. That connection would have made it easier to build a stronger coalition to invade and secure Iraq.
Instead, they got arrogant, sloppy and desperate.
IN FACT, they have already planned the next 9/11 attack and who they intend to pin it on:
"The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President **** Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option."
READ MORE: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/22/164841/163
Now, before the next 9/11 happens (and you know it will) ask yourself: What would IRAN have to gain by staging a terrorist attack on U.S. SOIL?
Ergo, why does the Cheney administration already have plans to NUKE IRAN after the next terrorist attack? How can they possibly know there will be one (*choke*) and even assuming so, how can they possibly know it will have been IRAN that did it?
Does anyone besides me smell a rat?
GET A CLUE PEOPLE. 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. THEY PLAN TO DO IT AGAIN WITH THEIR POLLS IN THE TOILET; THE LAW CATCHING UP WITH THEM AT LONG LAST AND LITERALLY NOTHING TO LOSE
And when it happens, will you then understand?
