"Westie" <
[email protected]> wrote in message news:<
[email protected]>...
> "Jonesy" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>
news:[email protected]...
> > "Westie" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<
[email protected]>...
> > > I don't know much about this system. Is the QR20 worth considering if I
> do
> > > some road, mostly trails and 'aggressive' XC stuff. Maybe a touch of freeriding on occasion?
> > > I'd need new hubs, wouldn't I? Is it more marketing hype? If I was hypothetically looking at a
> > > Z1FR
> fork
> > > would it be worth getting the standard dropouts or the QR20?
> >
> > Part of the argument for QR20 is the issue with disk brakes and front wheel separation. If it's
> > real, then this system would reduce it's likelihood.
> >
> > (Search rec.bicycles.tech on "disk brakes" and James Annan" for more opinion than you can shake
> > a stick at.)
> >
> > Yes, a new hub. Just the front, methinks. If the info you read scares you, go QR20. If it
> > doesn't, standard DO. For my part, both bikes have disk brakes on the front with standard DOs
> > and QRs (Shimano hubs and QRs, which supposedly are high quality for the task of disk-brake-
> > equipped forks.)
> >
> > Good luck.
>
> Thanks for the replies everyone. I'm fairly well versed in the disc brake/QR mayhem debate. I've
> got new Crossmax wheelset on the ride in question so I'm going to discard the idea of the QR20
> for the time being. I simply don't want to 'fork' out (haha) for a new hub. That solves the issue
> of the QR.
Agggg! Crossmax? For light freeride? I wouldn't.
--
Jonesy