Sorry, but determining "plausible power output" is not science and does not a fact make. There are many unknowns that factor into a given power output. The reports circulating doing that very same type of analysis--judging whether riders' performances, based on their power output, were suspicious or not--have virtually no scientific merit.gganio said:I was watching the Vuelta on Eurosport Deutschland and the commentator said: "peak power estimated yesterday was of "only" about 360 to 380 Watts. So we can be sure that no doping is involved in this race". When I heard that I was surprised. Commentators being that clear about doping, was not happening before. But then , that is one of the ways to test for doping. If the performance is not plausible then there is something wrong to start with! So we can enjoy these battles on all those puertos and altos. This last week will be epic!
... Apparently not.classic1 said:Quote:Originally Posted by steve .Â
I don't remember Horner being mentioned in the USADA report. Perhaps he has a naturally high hematocrit and can now finally take advantage of it.
Rider 15 apparently
Maybe he thought people would just stop asking or that answering would only dignify the baseless question. Just because the public wants to know something doesn't mean they have a right to answers. Likewise just because the public suspects something--and quite often that suspicion is based on little or no facts--doesn't mean their suspicions deserve a response. At any rate, the public won't believe anything unless their suspicions are confirmed, and that puts cyclists--in this case, Horner--in an impossible position. Frankly, I think one of the significant problems with doping in cycling is the public suspicion run amok. The only answers that the public will accept are those that confirm their suspicions, and as a result cyclists that are clean are just ****ed in the public eye. Chris Froome gets the same treatment.classic1 said:Then why didn't he just deny it the other week? He's been rather 'disingenuous' of late. No doubt it will come out, either way.
From Cyclingnews back in Sept: Cyclingnews: There has been a lot of stuff on Twitter you may or may not have been aware of over the last few weeks. A lot of it speculation, a lot of it unfair but one of the points was the claim you are a redacted name, number 15 in the USADA report. Do you know anything about that? Horner: No I don’t know anything about that. I’d have to read up on it or something.classic1 said:Then why didn't he just deny it the other week? He's been rather 'disingenuous' of late. No doubt it will come out, either way.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.