M
Muttley
Guest
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 20:37:19 GMT, "Ken [NY)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:45:07 GMT, [email protected] (Muttley)
>claims:
>
>>And, did you see what happened when he went to Britain?
>>
>>Unlike any other president, republican or democrat, he had to be shielded from
>>the population because he is so universally reviled.
>
> Clinton, Bush 41 and Reagan never had to have security when in
>crowds?
Of course they had to have security.
But the chimp wasn't allowed anywhere near crowds, because the crowds were all
hostile.
It wasn't that they were frightened that he would be attacked, it was because he
wanted the trip to show him as a popular world statesman, and if he had not been
shielded from the populace, it would have been made very obvious that was far
from the case.
And that would have suited neither him, nor his poodle, the British prime
minister.
>On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:45:07 GMT, [email protected] (Muttley)
>claims:
>
>>And, did you see what happened when he went to Britain?
>>
>>Unlike any other president, republican or democrat, he had to be shielded from
>>the population because he is so universally reviled.
>
> Clinton, Bush 41 and Reagan never had to have security when in
>crowds?
Of course they had to have security.
But the chimp wasn't allowed anywhere near crowds, because the crowds were all
hostile.
It wasn't that they were frightened that he would be attacked, it was because he
wanted the trip to show him as a popular world statesman, and if he had not been
shielded from the populace, it would have been made very obvious that was far
from the case.
And that would have suited neither him, nor his poodle, the British prime
minister.