Those Xray images again



T

Tony Raven

Guest
It appears that those appalling cycle helmet xray images are back on a
Government website with a whole load of misleading propaganda associated
with them. Didn't the Government agree not to use them?
http://www.cyclesense.net/homepages/02.htm

--
Tony

" I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong."
Bertrand Russell
 
Response to Tony Raven:
> It appears that those appalling cycle helmet xray images are back on a
> Government website with a whole load of misleading propaganda associated
> with them. Didn't the Government agree not to use them?
> http://www.cyclesense.net/homepages/02.htm



They certainly offer a graphic demonstration of how much larger the
effective size of the head is with a helmet on. </bright side>


I now have to remember to delete the X-Face header... ;-)

--
Mark, UK
"The Internet was a better place when you had to TRY to get on it."
 
Mark McNeill twisted the electrons to say:
> Response to Tony Raven:
> > It appears that those appalling cycle helmet xray images are back on a
> > Government website with a whole load of misleading propaganda associated
> > with them. Didn't the Government agree not to use them?
> > http://www.cyclesense.net/homepages/02.htm

> They certainly offer a graphic demonstration of how much larger the
> effective size of the head is with a helmet on. </bright side>


They also provide a graphic demonstration of how much of the head they
don't provide any protection[1] for ...

[1] In so far as polystyrene hats can be said to offer protection.
--
These opinions might not even be mine ...
Let alone connected with my employer ...
 
In article <[email protected]>, Tony Raven wrote:
>It appears that those appalling cycle helmet xray images are back on a
>Government website with a whole load of misleading propaganda associated
>with them. Didn't the Government agree not to use them?
>http://www.cyclesense.net/homepages/02.htm


That was the boring old government, this is the dynamic new government.
Or something.
 
>
>That was the boring old government, this is the dynamic new government.
>Or something.



Its definitely more "or something" than "dynamic". If you email the
website a comment you get "Mail delivery failed: returning message to
sender".

**** our what?
--
bob